Class800
Established Member
The two Tyndrum stations are served by the same train - but after it splits at Crianlarich
It might not strictly count (but the names are close enough to be worth noting on this thread), but here's another of the latter type: certain evening trains on the South Coast call at both Bosham and Cosham.If the requirement is simply, two stations share a word (which is how most people who've replied seem to have interpreted it), then there must be dozens, if not hundred of pairs. Basically anywhere where a line has multiple stations in the same town and with the name of the town featuring in the station's name.
If the requirement is for the name of a station to be contained wholely in the name of another station, then it's more interesting and there'd be fewer places.
Your suggestion of West Hampstead and West Ham seems particularly unusual because the two stations actually refer to completely different places. I wonder if there are any other examples like that?
Nice!It might not strictly count (but the names are close enough to be worth noting on this thread), but here's another of the latter type: certain evening trains on the South Coast call at both Bosham and Cosham.
Winner for me!I think I've found a corker:
Islip > West Ruislip
There's only a very small number of services that call at both, but they do exist (the 0815 from Islip gets into West Ruislip at 0914 for example).
Would you say that Wolverton is fully contained inside Wolverhampton? (Although sadly no direct trains all the way through today, did the Wolverton portion go through in that ill-fated attempt to split/join at New Street?)Most posts above don't qualify. "Tyndrum Lower" isn't contained in "Tyndrum Upper" in the same way as the examples ("West Ham" fully contained inside "West Hampstead" and "Reading" is fully contained inside "Reading West").
Two of my own which do qualify:
Luton > Luton Airport Parkway
Bedford > Bedford St John's
Two more inspired by yoursGarforth > East Garforth
Tenuous and not currently a direct service:
York > Bramley (Yorks)
Definitely today, but may have had a portion go through about 2 years ago when they were splitting at New Street?Stretching it probably, but doesn't that fail anyway as there's no direct trains between the two?
This is in the same boat as the (Yorks) example above, for me. The station in Brighton is just called London Road, the suffix is only used in the computer systems and publicity.Two more inspired by yours
Guildford > London Road (Guildford)
Brighton > London Road (Brighton)
Ahh, maybe I misunderstood. I did not see the significance of fully contained. The title of the thread was overlapping names.Most posts above don't qualify. "Tyndrum Lower" isn't contained in "Tyndrum Upper" in the same way as the examples ("West Ham" fully contained inside "West Hampstead" and "Reading" is fully contained inside "Reading West").
Tasty!I think I've found a corker:
Islip > West Ruislip
There's only a very small number of services that call at both, but they do exist (the 0815 from Islip gets into West Ruislip at 0914 for example).
Could also have Sheffield, Dronfield and Chesterfield!Three matching endings in a row at Batley, Morley, Cottingley.
That one will be broken if Dore & Totley ever regains MML platforms though!Could also have Sheffield, Dronfield and Chesterfield!
If we're overlapping just the "Ex-", we could add to the list Exton, giving a total of five.Exmouth - Paignton trains run through Exeter Central, Exeter St Davids and Exeter St Thomas.
West Monkseaton and Monkseaton on the Tyne & Wear Metro