I agree with your first theory. I think these 'bombs' were the work of pranksters who get their kicks from scaring people. I hope the police catch these 'jokers' and treat them as terrorists.yorkie said:I have two theories.
Firstly, they maybe didn't have bombs and their aim was to close Underground lines, put people off the Underground, cause panic, cause massive delays etc. If this is the case they succeeded.
Secondly, perhaps their bombs were faulty, and just the detanators went off. For all 4 to be faulty then that seems incredibly lucky, surely that can't be a co-incidence? Perhaps someone sabotaged them, in the knowledge that they would only injure the bombers themselves and would have a good chance of them being caught?
Personally I think the sabotage theory is more likely. I could, of course, be totally wrong!
The latest 4 were clearly also (attempted) suicide bombers, but when the bombs failed they obviously did not want to be caught and questioned so ran.London Tube said:I don't think these were the same group of people as the last ones as they were apprently "running away" when they left the bombs. The other 4 were all suicide bombers :?