Under Nigel Farage, UKIP struck a chord with many voters because of their stance on the EU and in parts of the country sizeable numbers of voters turned out for them, at one time all of my councillors - city and county - were UKIP. Its easy to forget how successful they were. Since then, under a number of leaders they have struggled to find a role. If Gerard Batten seriously thinks that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is going to provide the policies that encouraged almost a third of those who voted to cast their vote for UKIP in future elections, he is suffering from delusions. Expect them to finish between Monster Raving Loony and Bus Pass Elvis at the next election. There is enough division without his bile.
In my view Farage made UKIP into a successful populist protest party which was also a bit of a personality cult with people liking his branding of himself as just an "honest ordinary guy" .Pople would vote for them in elections they felt meaningless like elections for MEP's and local elections . But the party even at the height of its success never managed to get a relative number of MP's .
Of course now the party has financial issues and has closed many local offices . Its questionable if it has the network to enable it to be able to field candidates in all constituencies at the next election .
Yes, TR can be a loose cannon but who else is actually campaigning on this issue. Corbyn removed Sarah Champion from the shadow cabinet because she talked about this. (Tories no better BTW)
He is not campaigning though , the actual definition of campaign is to "work in an organized and active way towards a goal".As you have already alluded to , Stephen Yaxley Lennon is a lose cannon who does as he pleases and is in no way organised in his statements or conduct . I would also argue that what he was doing inside and outside the court on the two latest occasions that have gained wide publicity have been counterproductive and are not working towards any beneficial goal for society .
Had Yaxley Lennon (notwithstanding past conduct) come out and instead of risking the collapse of trials actually tried to support charities working with the victims of the exploitation that has occurred I would have some sympathy with the argument that he is campaigning in the interests of these victims . But when he engages in a course of action that could have led to the collapse of a series of linked trials (as was also almost the case in Rochdale because of the acts of a far right muppet ) I have no sympathy with his assertion that he is interested in the victims of these crimes .If the trials in Leeds had collapsed then at best the victims could have had to go through the ordeal of giving evidence again and had to endure the mental anguish of an even more protracted trial process . The worst case scenario could have been the victims seeing their abusers walk free . As others have said , turning up outside the court and risking the trial of men that have already been detected , investigated and are in the process of being prosecuted is not exposing these abuse gangs .
Stephen Yaxley Lennon has always said disparaging things about Muslims , whilst you do protest that this is his legal right to do so it is worth pointing out that little he has had to say about Muslims has actually been constructive and at times he has sailed dangerously close to inciting violence . He is now hijacking the tragic cases of people abused by groups of men who in the cases he focusses on also mostly happen to be Muslims to try and further his portrayal of the Muslim population of the UK as bad . Simple logic disproves his portrayal of British Muslims as such . Surely logic dictates we would be seeing many more cases of terrorism and child sexual exploitation if all of the 2.8million Muslims in the UK had the same tendencies . Correlation does not always equal causation .
You say name one instance of something said by "Tommy" which is racist . I raise you the task of naming one person involved in sexual exploitation actually exposed by him ? Name me one victim actually supported by him directly ?
The sad thing is , whilst Yaxley Lennon is living it up in his mansion with his flash cars , many of his supporters on the breadline are being duped into contributing towards his lifestyle .And even worse as you have already alluded to by mentioning your own family he is spreading unnecessary fear to dry and drive people into an emotive response and further fund his lifestyle.