Until a better answer comes along, it could be a relic of 10ft wheelbase wagons and their desire to derail at the magic speed of 49mph, hence the speed limit of 45mph imposed on them. A single axle could derail and be dragged for miles before finding a suitable crossover etc. to pile up on.Hi,
I have noticed that, on the Settle & Carlisle line many of the viaducts have guard rails [in the four-foot] on the northbound track but none on the southbound.
Can anyone explain this please?
Moony
I imagine the OP knows that, the question is why on one track and not the other.These are installed To keep any derailed vehicle from striking parapet based on line speed .
View attachment 109130
Correct, but the original posed question was why are they only fitted on the down line and not the up?These are installed To keep any derailed vehicle from striking parapet based on line speed .
View attachment 109130
Until a better answer comes along, it could be a relic of 10ft wheelbase wagons and their desire to derail at the magic speed of 49mph, hence the speed limit of 45mph imposed on them. A single axle could derail and be dragged for miles before finding a suitable crossover etc. to pile up on.
Incidentally, I always considered part of the problem to be NOT telling drivers the true nature of the dynamics involved. By being limited to 45mph, I am sure some drivers, when running late thought "another 5mph won't hurt", but that put them right on the dangerous harmonics. Pull the train through to 55mph and things settled down again. I have confirmed this with several drivers.
Might help if we knew which viaduct(s) it was.Correct, but the original posed question was why are they only fitted on the down line and not the up?
Not during the 10ft wheelbase "upending" saga. Most 45mph freights were diverts off the WCML while we got on with extensive renewals. One or two heavy freights were loaded south, empty north, like the Long Meg anhydrite, but that was a law unto itself and restricted to 35mph!A guess but going back to the original posters question could it be something to do with the dynamic behaviour of loaded and unloaded wagons?
Didn't Settle-Carlisle previously had loaded freight flows primarily in one direction?
There aren't any on either road over Dent Head viaduct.Dent Head Viaduct has guard rails on both roads whereas a little further north, Arten Gill Viaduct is an example of many that have them on the down only.
Moony
I think the question was if the guard rails were on the track that is on the "outside" of the curve. The thinking being that a if a train on the inside of the curve derailed, the other track would be a natural barrier.All the guard rails on the S&C are in the four foot (between the running rails)
Yes - sorry that's what I was getting at - I am well aware of where they go and the intricacies of the gathering / flare panels - having had to detail them at various times - it's not uncommon to see them fitted to the "outside" curve only - as you note if the train on the inside comes off - the opposite sixfoot rail acts a bit like a guard rail. The original observation of only one guard set of rails might also be influenced by track gradient - ie fitted to the curve at the bottom of a gradient. Having said that - any that I have detailed recently on 2 track railway - both tracks have had them fitted. The final say on if they should be fitted is decided by the Network Rail Route Asset Manager (RAM - Track) - at least that is what the standard currently says.I think the question was if the guard rails were on the track that is on the "outside" of the curve. The thinking being that a if a train on the inside of the curve derailed, the other track would be a natural barrier.