Virgin locos

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by AJP, 5 Feb 2006.

Best Virgin Traction from Below

Poll closed 10 Mar 2006.
  1. HST's

    19 vote(s)
    70.4%
  2. 86's

    1 vote(s)
    3.7%
  3. 87's

    7 vote(s)
    25.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AJP

    AJP Established Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    30 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Doncaster
    From the following which is better..
    HST's
    86's
    87's
     
  2. Registered users do not see these banners - join or log in today!

    Rail Forums

     
  3. Max

    Max Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    5,263
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    Location:
    London
    Out of those I would prefer HST, but surely you have missed so many options (90,47,57 etc.) that it is hard to give an honest opinion :scratch:
     
  4. AJP

    AJP Established Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    30 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Doncaster
    I just want to no rom them locos thats all:)
     
  5. richa2002

    richa2002 Established Member

    Messages:
    2,120
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    HSTs all the way.
     
  6. Julian G

    Julian G Established Member

    Messages:
    3,510
    Joined:
    9 Jun 2005
    A HST is not a loco
    It's a power car , So it's make it a unit
     
  7. richa2002

    richa2002 Established Member

    Messages:
    2,120
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    We all know he means a Class 43.
     
  8. Nitro

    Nitro Member

    Messages:
    475
    Joined:
    20 Nov 2005
    Location:
    London
    87s but if like Laverack said if 90s were there thats would be my choice.
     
  9. Sprog

    Sprog Established Member

    Messages:
    1,318
    Joined:
    6 Sep 2005
    Location:
    SPM
    So whats this then (??) :neutral:

    [​IMG]

    *strokes chin*

    Oh, and before you say
    "thats 2 'powercars' so i doesnt count as a loco", in Russia etc, they have locomotives that have two or even three :o 'parts' to then, each containing a power unit etc., but it is still classified as one locomotive.
     
  10. Sprog

    Sprog Established Member

    Messages:
    1,318
    Joined:
    6 Sep 2005
    Location:
    SPM
    *cough* Skodas of the railways *cough*

    <D ;) :lol: :lol:
     
  11. NumptyDriver

    NumptyDriver Member

    Messages:
    13
    Joined:
    27 Jan 2006
    Location:
    Between chester and clitheroe, lime st and leeds.
    glorified luggage racks, hst's.

    when they came out they were nicknamed trams.
     
  12. AJP

    AJP Established Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    30 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Doncaster
    HST's/class 43's what ever sound good,look good they are DEFINATLY not a unit:@
     
  13. Guinness

    Guinness Established Member

    Messages:
    3,737
    Joined:
    13 Jun 2005
    87s I voted for as HSTs, 86s, 90s were common everywhere else but WCML where as the 87s were unique. :)
     
  14. AJP

    AJP Established Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    30 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Doncaster
    91's are unique to the ECML yet everyone hates them lol!!
     
  15. richa2002

    richa2002 Established Member

    Messages:
    2,120
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    I don't hate them! They have great horns :p
     
  16. devon_metro

    devon_metro Established Member

    Messages:
    7,562
    Joined:
    11 Oct 2005
    Location:
    London
    TBH i can't vote...

    Where are the 47's????

    :shock:
     
  17. Techniquest

    Techniquest Veteran Member

    Messages:
    17,437
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Nowhere Heath
    HSTs all the way!
     
  18. AJP

    AJP Established Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    30 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Doncaster

    YAY!! Im with ya!
     
  19. Jordy

    Jordy Established Member

    Messages:
    8,463
    Joined:
    9 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Leighton Buzzard
    HSTs for me!!!


    Do they???

    Jordy
     
  20. Aureol

    Aureol Established Member

    Messages:
    2,915
    Joined:
    29 Sep 2005
    Location:
    With a spanner in hand in D212's engine room
    It's gotta be HSTs for me!
    Though aren't they Class 43s and not DMUs? ;) ;) ;)
     
  21. 86242

    86242 Member

    Messages:
    558
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Waiting in some far corner of the country for a 37
    Saying a Power car is a Class 43 is no different to saying a Buffet car is a class 40. It is a unit with no set number and 2 power cars at each end... But one is still a proper train it is just not a loco.

    and saying one is a loco because two were back to back on the bedz one night last week is a bit like saying a 150 is a loco if it shunts a failed 158 about...
     
  22. Nick

    Nick Member

    Messages:
    976
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    Close but I'm gonna have to go for the HST!
     
  23. metrocammel

    metrocammel Member

    Messages:
    955
    Joined:
    11 Aug 2005
    Location:
    Ashton, Lancashire
    87's all the way (though I like 86's too) HST's are a bit bland IMO,OK they make a loud noise etc, but they dont have the same "passion" as some earlier loco's- But if i had the choice of a 57 or HST, I know I'd choose the Valenta. I had the MTU one (004) PC the other day, and by gum is it dull.
     
  24. Tom

    Tom Guest

    Can I just say that we could say the following;

    A HST - A rake of coaches with a class 43 'HST' locomotive at either end
    A class 43 - A locomotive which forms a HST
     
  25. 86242

    86242 Member

    Messages:
    558
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Waiting in some far corner of the country for a 37
    But Class 43 is a Warship but they had all gone by the times the TOPS system was introduced and a power car is a power car...
     
  26. 86242

    86242 Member

    Messages:
    558
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Waiting in some far corner of the country for a 37
    The sleeper does not use Top and Tailed 57s. It is just one at the front a 'proper loco hauled train' and it is even shunted about at Plymouth a HST is a fixed formation unit!
     
  27. AJP

    AJP Established Member

    Messages:
    1,148
    Joined:
    30 Sep 2005
    Location:
    Doncaster
    I had a top tailed 47, Damm it was a unit. HSTs 43's whatever are more of a Locomotive than a AC electric will ever be. ;)
     
  28. Techniquest

    Techniquest Veteran Member

    Messages:
    17,437
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Nowhere Heath
    *Shocked*

    Surely you realise HST sets are not fixed formation. They can have carriages added or taken off easily enough, just preferably not whilst in service.

    Get ready to say goodbye to the shunting at Plymouth too, that dedicated portion goes at the end of March. As for the FGW sleeper being 'proper' locomotive haulage, I agree in terms of it being traditional haulage, but a HST is still loco-hauled, just push-pull.

    In any case, I do believe this argument over HSTs being loco-hauled goes on far too often, but here's my final thought on it: HSTs are loco-hauled. Fact, end of story.

    As for everyone hating 91s, I'll raise my hand there. It's still loco-haulage, but I guess it's the coffins it pulls behind it that I don't like.

    Metcam, how could you not like 43004? I had it for haulage again today. Absolutely beast. We got held in the tunnel for platform clearance at Newport, so taking off again, the engine echoed down past me nicely. Taking off from Newport was a satisfying sound too! But I find it hard for someone to say it was dull. EMUs are dull, 004 sounds far more interesting than a 317!
     
  29. AlexS

    AlexS Established Member

    Messages:
    2,890
    Joined:
    7 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Just outside the Black Country
    Hmm - the whole HST is a unit argument can be applied nicely to the through wired 37s and Mk2s used on Leeds to Carlisle trains a little while ago.

    There's a locomotive at both end. Both work at the same time. The locomotives can come off, move around, and work independently of coaches and each other. The locomotives can if need be haul other things. Label the differences if you will. As far as I can tell, there aren't many between a proper through wired 37 and coaches set and a HST set

    And HSTs can run in various forms, they don't actually need to have 2 powercars on a train at all, they can run without anything else too.

    You can run small HSTs, big HSTs, HSTs with a few coaches, HSTs with no coaches, first class only HSTs, standard only HSTs.

    You can mention the corridor connection. Lots of locomotives had corridor connections in the 60s.

    The office was merely in place of a cab, and is gone now in any case.



    What is the difference between your coupled TNT through wired 37s on a rake of Mk2s then, with a HST?
     
  30. Techniquest

    Techniquest Veteran Member

    Messages:
    17,437
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Nowhere Heath
    Nothing? Thanks for putting some good points up AlexS, sums up the 'HST is loco-haulage' argument well.

    So there's some smart Midlanders around too? *JOKE!*
     
  31. 86242

    86242 Member

    Messages:
    558
    Joined:
    8 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Waiting in some far corner of the country for a 37
    And even if you think one is a loco that does not make me take any more interest in them, they are a unit, they are boring, they are just a HST... But I do think they are a 'proper train' and something nice to travel in but they are just a unit with a power car at each end...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page