transmanche
Established Member
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 6,018
No. You may be thinking of the Northern City line.Weren't the Victoria line tunnels built to be able to accommodate mainline size trains?
No. You may be thinking of the Northern City line.Weren't the Victoria line tunnels built to be able to accommodate mainline size trains?
Absolutely not. There is one at Finsbury Park that is, but only because it was previously a platform on the Great Northern and City, which was originally built to carry main line stock and the rest of which eventually became the line down to Moorgate.Weren't the Victoria line tunnels built to be able to accommodate mainline size trains?
Whether the Victoria Line SHOULD have been built to mainline size is another matter, but I guess it would have been too expensive.
Victoria Line was one of the first projects justified by cost-benefit analysis, considering social benefits rather than just the financial numbers (which as many Edwardian investors found out will never stack up for an underground line). The BCR is an evolution of the same technique.It was one of the options considered during planning. They did decide against it on cost grounds, but whether it was actually "too expensive" in terms of BCR, I don't know. I don't believe they had BCR-type decision making back then.
No. You may be thinking of the Northern City line.
Weren't the Victoria line tunnels built to be able to accommodate mainline size trains?
Went down to TCR Crossrail during the open day a few weeks back and on a hot muggy day outside, the platform level was lovely and cool, so much so I thought it was air conditioned.