Going by Ufton Nervet, Grayrigg and any number of other derailments it's safer to have unbreakable windows. I can only think of Ladbroke Grove where it was an advantage to have breakable windows, which was the point I was making. Plenty of accidents could have had less serious outcomes for the passengers/crew if there were unbreakable windows (perhaps two or maybe even four less fatalities at Ufton Nervet for instance). Only one might have been made worse for not having them. Therefore there is quite a strong argument for getting rid of them (especially as OL Leigh points out there are normally any number of alternative exits available).
I think I'd have found an alternative method of commute in his situation hock: that's amazingly bad luck!
I can see that unbreakable windows are probably the best thing in the majority of cases (at least when diesel traction is superceded! )
Part of me still likes the idea of having something to smash and break in the event of an emergency. Perhaps it's human nature!