Apsley boards making really good use of the space dont really understand this squashing up on one side.View attachment 59967
Apsley boards making really good use of the space dont really understand this squashing up on one side.View attachment 59967
Sorry but your reaction to this is so OTT. And making LM sound like they were just the best.
I'd generally agree with that. LM weren't particularly well-liked as a TOC and for good reason, WMT may well be better, but LM's branding was pretty good. Whatever you think of the fleet liveries, I'd argue that branding on this franchise is poor - somewhat confusing and badly designed.As a TOC they were mixed (though I don't agree with your other point about it going into meltdown), but their marketing, publicity and design was second to none - I think I'd only put ScotRail ahead of them in "look and feel" terms. They had an absolutely excellent, strong brand that was applied really well to everything they did.
Now that I have seen the full WMR livery on trains I realise that I don't like all over dark colours. I had the same reaction to the similar First livery as in First Great Western. I rate the LNW livery better than the WMR but I would still say that LM livery was much better.
Have to respond to the other points made that I'd sooner a TOC try and at least run a service during disruption than get it's PR on point
I think it should do both. They are done by entirely separate sets of staff, so there is no real case for them not to.
That aside, I don't agree with the views on LM in disruption, at least in the context of the south WCML. The policy followed, whether intentional or not, is basically "run everything as booked even if it's badly delayed", which is the best way to provide the capacity needed; it can be sorted out by cancellations between the peaks. I fear that the new greater number of long through services will necessitate a more Southern-like policy of skip-stopping, short-forming and cancellations, which is abandoning the interests of the core market of the franchise (local passengers) in favour of an extra few quid from cheap fares.
It does raise questions about what are station name boards for. If it is tell passengers on trains which is their stop to get off then they should be large and spaced at reasonably short intervals along the platform. If they are to tell people standing on the platform who have got lost then small letters are OK. Perhaps it is my age but I do not read passing station name boards as quickly as I used to do.
Just to get a little way back on track, the more I see that nasty green vinylled front end on the 350s the uglier I think it looks. It’s also not wearing very well with yellow spots appearing through it. I also saw a /3 the other day with a formerly half yellow gangway door that had had its black upper half painted by brush in a totally mismatched shade of pale custard. Much like the half-a***d re-livery of the 350/2s and the silly station signs with tiny writing, it does beg the comment ‘if you can’t do a job properly, don’t do it at all’...!
I'm guessing they have found that the half-black half-yellow gangway doors don't have quite enough yellow on them to comply?
Either way they should have waited for the lights to be upgraded before doing that. If nothing else, the yellow gangway emphasizes the pig-ugly part of a gangwayed train, rather than the previous yellow (particularly the later half-black version) which emphasized its more attractive parts such as the curves of the front windows rather than just showing off the collection of dead flies and wasps on something which rather resembles a coffin standing on end.
It's just rubbish from start to finish. Putting "direct trains to Birmingham International" on signs on a platform that does not have, has never had and will never have direct trains to Birmingham International (which WILL cause confusion) is just the icing on the cake (or more accurately the fly on the turd), really. If you're going to have that on the signs, have it say somewhere important where you can get to from there, like, you know, that big city at the end of the south WCML that quite a lot of people like to go to once in a while?
The one thing I like about it is the colour palette - the two-tone green looks quite nice.
I'm guessing they have found that the half-black half-yellow gangway doors don't have quite enough yellow on them to comply?
Either way they should have waited for the lights to be upgraded before doing that. If nothing else, the yellow gangway emphasizes the pig-ugly part of a gangwayed train, rather than the previous yellow (particularly the later half-black version) which emphasized its more attractive parts such as the curves of the front windows rather than just showing off the collection of dead flies and wasps on something which rather resembles a coffin standing on end.
It's just rubbish from start to finish. Putting "direct trains to Birmingham International" on signs on a platform that does not have, has never had and will never have direct trains to Birmingham International (which WILL cause confusion) is just the icing on the cake (or more accurately the fly on the turd), really. If you're going to have that on the signs, have it say somewhere important where you can get to from there, like, you know, that big city at the end of the south WCML that quite a lot of people like to go to once in a while?
The one thing I like about it is the colour palette - the two-tone green looks quite nice.
At the risk of ‘and-another-thing’-ing (!), one of the most toe-curling features of the brand has to be the Quote of the Day where staff are evidently instructed to write ‘hilarious’ or ‘meaningful’ quotes of their choice on a whiteboard in a quasi-spontaneous way. As I understand it, it’s a thing that started spontaneously on the Underground as a bit of fun but then Management got hold of it; and now, not only has it become officially part of the gig but it’s spreading to other companies! I bet the staff hate it. *
*Unless I’m being a cynic and it genuinely is a bit of fun that happens to be everywhere because station staff love doing it....!
Just looking at a sample journey in National Rail Enquiries shows that Hemel Hempstead WILL have a direct sercie to Brimingham International from the new timetable. Hourly departing at XX47 and arriving at International at XX28.......no changes and a journey time of 1 hour 41 minutes.
Not from platform 4 it won't. It will depart from Platform 3, which is where that sort of sign, if they are going to waste space on the station signs with it rather than just putting it on a poster, should go.
TBH I actually don't mind that, I recall thinking it was a fairly nice feature nicked from the Underground that gives something relatively faceless a bit of a personal edge. But each to their own.
True enough.........
Was interested to see these services will terminate at Rugeley Trent Valley, running Euston-Northampton-Birmingham-Walsall-Cannock-Rugeley.........
If a staff member comes on and says ‘well actually we rather enjoy it’ then I would perform a complete u-turn. I suspect they don’t, though...!
Good news, same at Lichfield Trent Valley which is finally getting lifts installed.Not sure if this is the right thread (given that it relates to station improvements), but Stechford is now receiving a £3.9m modernisation for the Access for All scheme (read: lift installation and a new footbridge), due to be complete by the end of the year.
Indeed - that's due to be finished this summer, and a similar scheme for Tring is due to conclude by the end of the year too.Good news, same at Lichfield Trent Valley which is finally getting lifts installed.