chris89
Established Member
Nice to see someone else has the D200 . Would love to get the D300 but can't afford to, next things to get for myself are some longer zoom lenses.
Chris
Chris
My Cameras? Well for 35mm 'old-fashioned' slide and film I still use my original Asahi Pentax K1000. Digital, depends where I am and how much I'm willing to carry. Usually the trusty Nikon Coolpix 5700 (with attachment lens adaptors), or if I'm travelling light my dinky little Nikon Coolpix S225. I gave up on mobile phone cameras long ago, though I appreciate the technology has probably improved in the last few years!!
Canon 350D. Chose Canon because already had Canon-fit lenses for film camera. 350D is OK, but autofocus not too quick or reliable in some lighting conditions, and has tendency to underexpose slightly. Also suspect sensor needs cleaning after 4 years use.
Bevan Price
The Minolta was far from the first autofocus camera released;
Between 1960 and 1973, Leitz (Leica) patented an array of autofocus and corresponding sensor technologies. At photokina 1976, Leica had presented a camera based on their previous development, named Correfot, and in 1978 they displayed an SLR camera with fully operational autofocus. The first mass-produced autofocus camera was the Konica C35 AF, a simple point and shoot model released in 1977. The Polaroid SX-70 Sonar OneStep was the first autofocus single-lens reflex camera, released in 1978. The Pentax ME-F, which used focus sensors in the camera body coupled with a motorized lens, became the first autofocus 35 mm SLR in 1981. In 1983 Nikon released the F3AF, their first autofocus camera, which was based on a similar concept to the ME-F. The Minolta Maxxum 7000, released in 1985, was the first SLR with an integrated autofocus system, meaning both the AF sensors and the drive motor were housed in the camera body, as well as an integrated film advance winder - which was to become the standard configuration for SLR cameras from this manufacturer, as it would for Nikon. Canon, however, elected to develop their EOS system with motorised lenses instead. More recently, Nikon have also adopted this strategy with their AF-S range of lenses; their entry-level DSLRs do not have a focus motor in the body.
I also now have a 5D(ii), but I disagree about the image quality compared with a 30D (which I upgraded from) - the 5Dii is on a different level altogether, much superior. The same lens (24-105 L series) was used on both so that is a direct comparison.In the last eight years I have owned the following, 300D, 450D, D30, 10D and currently own a 30D and a 5D. The biggest improvement in image quality came when I started using L series lenses, an L series lens on a 500D would probably beat a regular lens on a 50D.
It's been a couple of months since I added the 5D to my collection and while the image quality is generally the same as my 30D I find myself a great deal less limited by the 5D simply because it is more functional and in particular performs much better at high ISOs.
Last tuesday I took the 5D on it's first proper railway day out (LM Great Escape) and was very happy with the results and the way I could take pictures in circumstances where the 30D would have really struggled.
Has anyone on here upgraded from say a Canon 500D/450D/400D etc upto one of the more expensive models? How much difference is there between the two in terms of picture quality?