• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

More dangerous lineside behaviour around Flying Scotsman

Status
Not open for further replies.

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,458
The above post is sensible but I think it should be pointed out that while charters must make money for the operators they do not face the same financial penalties as franchised operators when things go wrong. It was suggested above this had changed. I am not sure it has.

Do charter operators get compensated to the same extent as TOCs when their trains are delayed?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,993
Location
Hope Valley
Do charter operators get compensated to the same extent as TOCs when their trains are delayed?
The Charter regime works in rather a different way to franchised TOCs (where the parameters are around average lateness at Monitoring Points across Service Groups over a 4-week period). As with the freight regimes there is a 'flat rate' related to delay over distance operated.
Both types of regime use 'benchmarks' of 'expected' performance with 'bonuses' or 'penalties' depending on whether actual performance is better or worse than benchmark.
So, it is not the "same extent" but overall a charter operator can be compensated for delays (and cancellations) caused by Network Rail or other operators.
Despite the skepticism there is a real regime.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,458
So I guess there are differences in the way a charter operator is both compensated and charged to compensate others?
This seems reasonable, and not a case of them being treated preferentially as was being alluded to.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,512
Location
UK
Looks like the video has been removed. Shame, could have been used as evidence.
 

DanDaDriver

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
338
That tweet has been deleted.

The video showed Flying Scotsman being filmed from the cess (Quite some way from a position of safety by the looks of it) as the camera panned to follow the train it showed another 4/5 people stood with the person filming in various positions and some closer to the running line.
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,162
be a good use for a Pacer......run it ahead of the charter stuffed full of police officers. Anyone on the track gets arrested
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,828
Location
Devon
I’ve just got on a Paignton train at Exeter St David’s and just heard them announce that a Cross Country service is running over 100 minutes late due to a trespassing incident.
I’m assuming this due to the above?
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,042
Location
here to eternity
I’ve just got on a Paignton train at Exeter St David’s and just heard them announce that a Cross Country service is running over 100 minutes late due to a trespassing incident.
I’m assuming this due to the above?

I was at Reading earlier and a Cross Country service to Newcastle was announced as cancelled due to an earlier trespass incident. It looks as though the inbound working to form the service was turned back short at Oxford.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,986
Location
Yorkshire
I’ve just got on a Paignton train at Exeter St David’s and just heard them announce that a Cross Country service is running over 100 minutes late due to a trespassing incident.
I’m assuming this due to the above?
Was that the Glasgow to Plymouth? If so, yes, though that train was also already delayed due to various other reasons. I was on it earlier today.
 

Dren Ahmeti

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2017
Messages
550
Location
Bristol
Thankfully for TVSC and the platform staff at Paddington, they ran it back ECS (empty) to Southall from Reading, avoiding the huge throng of people that would’ve congregated at Paddington!
 

johnnychips

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2011
Messages
3,679
Location
Sheffield
There seem to have been several delays today for different reasons:
- the XC train from Sheffield to Plymouth at about 1255 was delayed due to a ‘broken rail’ by about 25 mins. Not sure if you were on this one, Yorkie.
- shenanigans due to the Flying Scotsman. Must say I travelled from Donny to Sheffield just in advance of it, and there were lots of photographers and sightseers but none where they shouldn’t have been
- there have been many delays between Newcastle and Durham early evening, again due to trespassing, but evidently not the Flying Scotsman.

I’m sure people will have better info than me, but just pointing out the XC delays are not due to one cause.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,042
Location
here to eternity
be a good use for a Pacer......run it ahead of the charter stuffed full of police officers. Anyone on the track gets arrested

That reminds me of the old "Q" train which was a DMU bubble car which used to run through areas of high trespass and vandalism which was exactly as you say stuffed full of police officers waiting to catch any offenders red handed!
 

Shadow Cat

Member
Joined
23 Apr 2017
Messages
37
That reminds me of the old "Q" train which was a DMU bubble car which used to run through areas of high trespass and vandalism which was exactly as you say stuffed full of police officers waiting to catch any offenders red handed!
I wouldn't be against this (As long as it was safe for the police to do) as there is no justification to trespassing, its just wrong.

And who wouldn't want to see either a 121 or 142 and the Scotsman on the same day (or at least I'm guessing you're talking about the Class 121... bubble car :) )
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,162
Would a pacer be big enough for all the people involved? Maybe an HST or 442 would do the job! :D
easy to take all the seats out of a pacer so you can pack more crims in, and no end doors for them to jump out of. Maybe a better option would be a 37 with a couple of GUVs.............the 37 would draw more photographers in and make them easier to grab
 

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
2,908
Location
Lancashire
Would a pacer be big enough for all the people involved? Maybe an HST or 442 would do the job! :D

Indeed and have a few railway staff who are magistrates ( so who know the issues) on board for instant application of justice
 

CeeJ

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2017
Messages
157
Last edited by a moderator:

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
2,912
There seem to have been several delays today for different reasons:
- the XC train from Sheffield to Plymouth at about 1255 was delayed due to a ‘broken rail’ by about 25 mins. Not sure if you were on this one, Yorkie.
- shenanigans due to the Flying Scotsman. Must say I travelled from Donny to Sheffield just in advance of it, and there were lots of photographers and sightseers but none where they shouldn’t have been
- there have been many delays between Newcastle and Durham early evening, again due to trespassing, but evidently not the Flying Scotsman.

I’m sure people will have better info than me, but just pointing out the XC delays are not due to one cause.
The 1255 ex Sheffield was 22 late at Sheffield and 106 late at Birmingham (about 20 minutes was lost going around the back to Chesterfield).
The Nottingham to Cardiff service in front of the Flying Scotsman took 70 mins between Burton and Tamworth (10 min journey) so it sounds like some people where a bit more line side than they should of been.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,828
Location
Devon
Was that the Glasgow to Plymouth? If so, yes, though that train was also already delayed due to various other reasons. I was on it earlier today.
I think it probably was.
It would’ve been due into Exeter at 18: something or other.

All of this reflects very badly on railway enthusiasts as a whole, regardless of the fact that most people on here couldn’t give a monkeys about Scotsman.
It’s unfortunate that this machine seems to bring out the railway equivalent of the Paparazzi whenever it hits the rails.
What can be done about this? It’s becoming a big problem...
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,627
At one point 8 trains were at a stand around Tamworth and crews were being verbally abused by people when asking them to move.

It's a national asset so put it back in it's box or restrict it to preserved lines. It's not worth the disruption that it causes wherever it goes.

I am a passionate supporter of our railway heritage but this particular loco has become an unacceptable risk to the railway network.

Failing that - do as suggested above and go for some headlines. Take a train out in front using the police that are having to man stations instead, detain all trespassers forcibly if necessary, push for the strongest possible penalties in court and make sure it makes the press.
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
2,415
Just get a nice freightliner to run with it (even going wrong road if necessary) to block the trespassers view, the look on their faces would be priceless!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top