Purple Orange
On Moderation
Is there anyone who can add a poll in to the thread? It would be good to canvass opinion (on admittedly a very Rail centric audience).
I think the answer sits with who we think will be providing long-distance rail services 15-20 years from now. HS2, NPR, Midlands Engine, a GWR equivalent and legacy services on the WCML and ECML (making a lot of stops along the way).
In the decades to come, long distance rail travel will be completely revolutionised, purely down to the speed of HS2, and it will be HS2 that will be the standard bearer for the rest of the U.K. rail industry. A 200m 8-car train, consisting of both standard and 1st class, may likely only have a shop, with 1st class having complimentary drinks and light food such as savoury and sweet pastries.
Of all the HS2 services, only 4 Euston service and 2 Birmingham services will be significantly longer than 90 minutes (roughly 25% of all HS2 trains per hour). 50% of HS2 tph will be 1 hour or less. Therefore will the DfT or a ToC be happy to provide full service catering for the 25%? I can’t see that scenario bearing fruit and whoever is operating those long-distance services in the future will want a uniform offering, resulting in a uniform cost base for running the services.
Then we will have NPR, which is essentially TPE and part of XC, who are already offering just a trolley service.
We will also have Midlands Engine that have signified their long distance routes from Bristol to Nottingham via New Street. What will they do that is drastically different from XC?
The GWR market remains relatively untouched by it all, so if anything, it could be Paddington long-distance services that retain anything that resembles what we see today.
We will then have the long-distance WCML & ECML services, which will probably be closer in operation to London Northwestern than Avanti or LNER. The rump of the 1st class market will be with HS2 and given that these services may be limited to 110 mph on the WCML, would it not be a class 350 equivalent plus a catering trolley?
I think the answer sits with who we think will be providing long-distance rail services 15-20 years from now. HS2, NPR, Midlands Engine, a GWR equivalent and legacy services on the WCML and ECML (making a lot of stops along the way).
In the decades to come, long distance rail travel will be completely revolutionised, purely down to the speed of HS2, and it will be HS2 that will be the standard bearer for the rest of the U.K. rail industry. A 200m 8-car train, consisting of both standard and 1st class, may likely only have a shop, with 1st class having complimentary drinks and light food such as savoury and sweet pastries.
Of all the HS2 services, only 4 Euston service and 2 Birmingham services will be significantly longer than 90 minutes (roughly 25% of all HS2 trains per hour). 50% of HS2 tph will be 1 hour or less. Therefore will the DfT or a ToC be happy to provide full service catering for the 25%? I can’t see that scenario bearing fruit and whoever is operating those long-distance services in the future will want a uniform offering, resulting in a uniform cost base for running the services.
Then we will have NPR, which is essentially TPE and part of XC, who are already offering just a trolley service.
We will also have Midlands Engine that have signified their long distance routes from Bristol to Nottingham via New Street. What will they do that is drastically different from XC?
The GWR market remains relatively untouched by it all, so if anything, it could be Paddington long-distance services that retain anything that resembles what we see today.
We will then have the long-distance WCML & ECML services, which will probably be closer in operation to London Northwestern than Avanti or LNER. The rump of the 1st class market will be with HS2 and given that these services may be limited to 110 mph on the WCML, would it not be a class 350 equivalent plus a catering trolley?