bishdunster
Member
The clock changes are done for a reason - southern England has approx 8 hours of daylight at the winter solstice and 16.5 hours at the summer solstice. The difference is greater further north.
8 hours in winter means it isn't possible to go to work, do a 9-5 job and go home in daylight for most people. The practical experience indicates there are fewer crashes if the hours of darkness are after work than before. It also allows primary schoolchildren largely to go to school and come home in daylight.
Obviously it does depend where you are - sunrise in Ramsgate on 21 December is almost an hour earlier than Fort William.
In the summer however, remaining on GMT would see the sun rise in June before 4am for most of the country (when almost no-one is about) and set everywhere before 9pm (when a lot of people are about). Using BST gives a significant electricity saving, most likely reduces crime against individuals (although perhaps not properties) and helps people top up the old Vitamin D.
If you used GMT all year round sunrise would be just after 3am in Aberdeen in June and sunset would be just after 8.10pm in Dover.
The current system allows the best use of limited daylight in winter and a more-energy efficient use of daylight in the summer. I appreciate some people find the change inconvenient, but it's the best use of the light we have. Whilst it isn't changing natural time, only the way humans count it, if you didn't shift the clocks then it's quite possible schools and businesses would end up shifting their hours anyway.
TBF if you do shift work rather than a 9-5 job as most (all?) rail staff do, then I can see why you might favour a single consistent timezone.
The EU's effort to stop changing clocks appears to have stalled. If it does eventually go ahead, I suspect it will be changed back within a few years when it becomes clear why the clocks changed twice a year in the first