Superb to see the Government are dealing with the “People’s Priorities” with zeal and full focus.
It’s not like there‘s an energy costs crisis, allegations of blackmail in the Commons, cost of living crisis, hefty fare rises, supply chain issues, massive queues outside Dover, etc. etc.
I salute our overlords for keeping the eye on the ball and sorting out the most important thing first.
I was coming on here to mention the Dover queues - Shapps is a canny operator who knows how to divert media attention - and announcements is a great bugbear of a lot of people, I'm sure there are a few local radio stations where today's phone in topic is the proliferation of announcements - he seems to have done a good job in re-announcing this yet again, even though it doesn't seem that much has changed since last time (in fact, given the "tactile" announcements about paving, things have got worse in the eyes of many people?)
I wonder in fact whether Shapps has a diary with "re-announce Beeching reinstatements" and "pledge to reduce tannoy announcements" scheduled every few months to keep re-stirring these particular pots, as they are a wonderful distraction from things like the problems on motorways (lack of hard shoulders, insufficient lorry drivers meaning some have to work punishing shifts that affect tiredness, long queues to get to ferry ports now that we are "Third Country" in the eyes of the EU etc)
I don't mind the announcements so much, because I appreciate that there's a cost to *not* having them. The quote generally attributed to the Easy Jet guy (Stelios) that "if you think Health & Safety is expensive, try an accident" feels appropriate here. Rightly or wrongly we live in a country where the cost of someone slipping down a stairwell or tripping on a pavement can cost organisations several thousand pounds even if they don't end up in court. So by having some "warnings", you can show that appropriate messages were made, in the way that a coffee cup will have a disclaimer printed to remind you that the contents may be hot - it's a bit dumbed down but the alternative is someone claiming that they were an innocent party carrying a hot cup of coffee down a slippery staircase before their accident. If you feel that there's not enough personal responsibility for such matters then, fine, but that's something that you need to raise with politicians (like Shapps!) - the railways are just trying to cope with the legislation and the cost of something going wrong.
Just wait until something goes wrong and you'll see the headlines asking "WHY WASN'T SOMETHING DONE" - e.g. the terror threat seems pretty low right now, there aren't bombs being left at train stations, but the minute that there is one that causes devastation you know that there'll be handwringing articles complaining that we should have "done something". So, whilst the "see it..." announcements are a pain, I think that the bigger problem is the culture that the railway has to operate in, whereby it's very risk averse because it knows that it'll be blamed for anything that goes wrong on railway property (whilst a car crash can kill several people but be entirely the fault of the driver with nobody blaming the Highways Agency etc). "Hate the game not the player", as I understand young people say.
It's a bit of an odd topic, in that so many people on here seem to be quite blasé about the need for warnings, yet are very safety focussed on other railway matters, wanting everything to be As Safe As Reasonable Possible (But Not If It Means Temporarily Interrupting My Quiet Journey). People on here can empathise with all sorts of tiny groups of people (someone was recently worrying about the number of people travelling from Llandridnod Wells to Manchester/ Liverpool who'd be inconvenienced by cuts to the Heart Of Wales), but I guess most people on here are very experienced travellers who've forgotten how bewildering things are for occasional passengers who'd value things like knowing that the train was scheduled to stop at their distant station.
Tricky balance, because it's got to be the same announcements for everyone, and there are going to be a lot of intermediate stops at which things need to be repeated (whilst, on planes, there only needs to be one "safety demonstration" at the start of the flight)
I doubt much will change in the next couple of years, I doubt that Shapps expects much to change, he's just regurgitating an old announcement about announcements because it's a cheap way of getting some good publicity "Government Cracks Down On Minor Irritant" (and hopes that you don't notice that there are much bigger problems that he isn't so focussed on, showing either the limitations of what Government can actually achieve or that Government isn't even bothering to pretend that they can fix the bigger stuff, but here's a repeat of something that they throw out every few months to appease their voters, much like constraining the BBC and sending refugees to "camps" far from the UK.. the sad thing is that this works for them and I've taken the bait and joined in the conversation, I know, I know...
(oh, and the "Takt" stuff feels like a distraction here, given that there are so many different calling patterns on long distance services, e.g. Edinburgh to Plymouth looks like a simple hourly service - call it "XC1" but then do you need to have variations for the Aberdeen/ Glasgow/ Newquay/ Paignton/ Penzance extensions, the services later in the day that terminate part route, the stations that don't get a call every hour like Dunbar/ Berwick/ Alrmouth/ Chesterfield/ Burton/ Tamworth... it works fine on "metro" networks where there's a simple route and everything calls everywhere, but trying to impose it onto longer distance trains would cause more confusion than it's worth)