• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

WMR Class 196 Build and Implementation

newtownmgr

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
627
Update further 5Q94 1156 Tyseley L.M.D to Long Marston has been declared a failure near to Norton Junction at 1610 hours.
37601 has a air compressor fault.
So will most likely spend the night at Worcester. So ironic that the 37 and 196s will need rescuing. Especially iff any other 196s are at Worcester under their own power. Stabled there.
None at Worcester & even if there was it wouldn’t be able to assist. 3 barrier coaches at the rear of the train & Worcester WMR drivers don’t sign Norton Jct
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

FrodshamJnct

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2019
Messages
3,481
Location
Cheshire
Update further 5Q94 1156 Tyseley L.M.D to Long Marston has been declared a failure near to Norton Junction at 1610 hours.
37601 has a air compressor fault.
So will most likely spend the night at Worcester. So ironic that the 37 and 196s will need rescuing. Especially iff any other 196s are at Worcester under their own power. Stabled there.

They were rescued by 66161 which was in the area on route learning.
 

newtownmgr

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
627
As an enthusiast of big noisy trains, that's pretty awesome. As an enthusiast of clean air and generally greener transport, however, not so much! Not sure which I side with more to be honest!
As someone who worked on both 37 & 47 & now drives the modern units. Give me clag & noise anytime. Although saying that it is nice to go home with the uniform still clean & not stinking
 

Covshire1

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2018
Messages
139

FrodshamJnct

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2019
Messages
3,481
Location
Cheshire

Second attempt lucky today for 5Q94 with 37601, 196010 and 196110. Hopefully they make it today.

Where have you got that from? It’s going to be 37510 from what I understand.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,674
Location
Nowhere Heath
As someone who worked on both 37 & 47 & now drives the modern units. Give me clag & noise anytime. Although saying that it is nice to go home with the uniform still clean & not stinking

In terms of general fun, there's no doubt a 37 making a racket would be good fun, but yes the clean air and lungs not full of fumes is worth the sacrifice of the sheer joy a 37 thrashing away brings.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
1,651
Location
South Staffordshire
Update further 5Q94 1156 Tyseley L.M.D to Long Marston has been declared a failure near to Norton Junction at 1610 hours.
37601 has a air compressor fault.
So will most likely spend the night at Worcester. So ironic that the 37 and 196s will need rescuing. Especially iff any other 196s are at Worcester under their own power. Stabled there.
It seems crazy to me that brand new DMUs are hauled around the country by 60 year old locos. I am assuming the 196 movement would not have been a failure if the units were "self powering" but hey
 

Jacob Porrett

On Moderation
Joined
28 Jan 2022
Messages
758
Location
Telford
Where have you got that from? It’s going to be 37510 from what I understand.
Facebook gen mate

37510 on the way to Worcester to rescue 37601.
37510 double heading with 37601 dit.

196113 looks like it will have 3/4 of its train at the moment whilst it's been shunted out of the way to make space for the MoD train today. Donnington RFT today (31/3/22).

It seems crazy to me that brand new DMUs are hauled around the country by 60 year old locos. I am assuming the 196 movement would not have been a failure if the units were "self powering" but hey
It's good to see though. It's probably becasue they haven't run under own power yet so it's better to drag them them cause any damage.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6995.JPG
    IMG_6995.JPG
    1.5 MB · Views: 96
Last edited:

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,868
Location
Devon
Just a gentle reminder to stay on topic before we go too far down memory lane… :)

Thanks!
 

newtownmgr

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
627
It seems crazy to me that brand new DMUs are hauled around the country by 60 year old locos. I am assuming the 196 movement would not have been a failure if the units were "self powering" but hey
No driver available that signs both the route & traction.
 

AgentGemini

Member
Joined
8 Jun 2019
Messages
119
Inside information tells me the training for onboard staff has been put back to May/June now. Not sure why, but another step in this sorry saga.
Meanwhile, EMR were due to get the remaining 170s in May. This will not be happening.

I can see these ending up being replaced in only a few years when the defects come to light. Without wishing to veer off course, the CAF built trams in Birmingham have once again been pulled for engineering defects. So it makes one wonder what life on the Shrewsbury to Wolverhampton and the Birmingham to Hereford lines will be like.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
1,586
Inside information tells me the training for onboard staff has been put back to May/June now. Not sure why, but another step in this sorry saga.
Meanwhile, EMR were due to get the remaining 170s in May. This will not be happening.

I can see these ending up being replaced in only a few years when the defects come to light. Without wishing to veer off course, the CAF built trams in Birmingham have once again been pulled for engineering defects. So it makes one wonder what life on the Shrewsbury to Wolverhampton and the Birmingham to Hereford lines will be like.
Yes I confirmed this a little while ago. It's related to door panels being retrofitted currently
 

newtownmgr

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
627
Inside information tells me the training for onboard staff has been put back to May/June now. Not sure why, but another step in this sorry saga.
Meanwhile, EMR were due to get the remaining 170s in May. This will not be happening.

I can see these ending up being replaced in only a few years when the defects come to light. Without wishing to veer off course, the CAF built trams in Birmingham have once again been pulled for engineering defects. So it makes one wonder what life on the Shrewsbury to Wolverhampton and the Birmingham to Hereford lines will be like.
One of the issues with the trams is the design. They are based on the urbos3 which is a pure tram designed for running over roads basically. These take some battering running over ballasted rails which is where the issues are arising. Train/trams similar to Sheffield would have been better but more expensive!
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
1,651
Location
South Staffordshire
Yes I confirmed this a little while ago. It's related to door panels being retrofitted currently
And it would be very easy to ask why the DfT didn't invidulate WMR's franchise bid and instruct them to buy the Conductor door panels in the build. Or did DfT blindly believe that DCO would be accepted as the standard method of train working. But why also did the Rosco not consider the door panels to be a selling point should it wish to place it's assets with another TOC ?
 

railwaytrack

Member
Joined
7 Mar 2022
Messages
254
Location
Pluckley
I am very surprised that they were ordered without door panels. Especially when you consider other trains like the the 700s and 717s were all built with door panels at every door throughout the train and in the cabs even though they have been DOO since day one. So i have no idea what they were thinking when the 196s got ordered. I think that they must have been hoping DOO would be implemented by now.

Have they made the same mistake with the 730s too? Or do they actually have door control panels fitted?

Does anyone know what work is involved with adding the door panels to the 196s? Will it be done on the cheap and just be a simple control box screwed on to the wall by the door and connected to the electrics like GTR Southern did in the middle coach of their 313s? Or are they actually properly rebuilding a door panel in to the body so it will look just like the panels on the 195s and 331s? Does anyone have any photos of the work being done?
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
1,651
Location
South Staffordshire
I am very surprised that they were ordered without door panels. Especially when you consider other trains like the the 700s and 717s were all built with door panels at every door throughout the train and in the cabs even though they have been DOO since day one. So i have no idea what they were thinking when the 196s got ordered. I think that they must have been hoping DOO would be implemented by now.

Have they made the same mistake with the 730s too? Or do they actually have door control panels fitted?

Does anyone know what work is involved with adding the door panels to the 196s? Will it be done on the cheap and just be a simple control box screwed on to the wall by the door and connected to the electrics like GTR Southern did in the middle coach of their 313s? Or are they actually properly rebuilding a door panel in to the body so it will look just like the panels on the 195s and 331s? Does anyone have any photos of the work being done?
I have no idea, but presumably class 195 and 197 were built with the panels ?
It is difficult to believe that in these austere days class 195 196 and 197 could be so different for what is essentially the same task - moving passengers.
 

Jacob Porrett

On Moderation
Joined
28 Jan 2022
Messages
758
Location
Telford
Inside information tells me the training for onboard staff has been put back to May/June now. Not sure why, but another step in this sorry saga.
Meanwhile, EMR were due to get the remaining 170s in May. This will not be happening.

I can see these ending up being replaced in only a few years when the defects come to light. Without wishing to veer off course, the CAF built trams in Birmingham have once again been pulled for engineering defects. So it makes one wonder what life on the Shrewsbury to Wolverhampton and the Birmingham to Hereford lines will be like.
Just have to wait and see. Hopefully no problems will occur once in service or it will be bus replacements. We are talking about CAF so anything could happen.

I have no idea, but presumably class 195 and 197 were built with the panels ?
It is difficult to believe that in these austere days class 195 196 and 197 could be so different for what is essentially the same task - moving passengers.
Funny though.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
1,586
Yes, 730s are in the same boat. The DfT fully expected to introduce DOO across the franchise prior to these units coming into service, hence the strikes a few years ago by the conductor grade.

I've seen photos of what the panels look like, but they aren't in situ so can't confirm but I believe it's integrated into the bodywork panels now.

Not long to wait now to see them in the flesh
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,674
Location
Nowhere Heath
I've been told two 196s will enter service in the May TT. 196105 is the first unit to use P6 at Wolverhampton.

Until I am sat on that train, and it departs, with me on board for the platform score and I have both photographic and video proof, I will not believe it :lol:

EDIT: I realise now you mean that the 196 is doing that platform already, and not a guarantee that it will happen on the day of the timetable change!
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,638
Until I am sat on that train, and it departs, with me on board for the platform score and I have both photographic and video proof, I will not believe it :lol:

EDIT: I realise now you mean that the 196 is doing that platform already, and not a guarantee that it will happen on the day of the timetable change!
Sir! I cannot believe a man of your calibre still requires the North Bay at Wolves :lol:
 

Top