railfan99
Established Member
As a foreigner, I like architecture.
But I also appreciate well maintained structures.
With the criteria of the main station building being at least 100 years old, and excluding the Greater London area, what's your vote for the best maintained (a) larger and (b) smaller station?
Those two latter terms are subjective but most of you wonderful UK locals will have a fair idea of what's a larger (York or Manchester Piccadilly) or smaller (Loughborough or Saltburn) station.
I'm talking mostly external walls and decorative features, not so much internally as the latter may have been renovated in recent years.
Treatments like tuck pointing appeal to me, or platform awnings in the delightful, unique English style with much clear glass and beautifully engineered support columns.
An attractive clock tower from Victorian times would be a winner.
Perhaps you can contribute according to pre-nationalisation operator: GWR, LMS, LNER or SR (though many stations of the latter may have been in the excluded Greater London).
But I also appreciate well maintained structures.
With the criteria of the main station building being at least 100 years old, and excluding the Greater London area, what's your vote for the best maintained (a) larger and (b) smaller station?
Those two latter terms are subjective but most of you wonderful UK locals will have a fair idea of what's a larger (York or Manchester Piccadilly) or smaller (Loughborough or Saltburn) station.
I'm talking mostly external walls and decorative features, not so much internally as the latter may have been renovated in recent years.
Treatments like tuck pointing appeal to me, or platform awnings in the delightful, unique English style with much clear glass and beautifully engineered support columns.
An attractive clock tower from Victorian times would be a winner.
Perhaps you can contribute according to pre-nationalisation operator: GWR, LMS, LNER or SR (though many stations of the latter may have been in the excluded Greater London).