Just a reminder that the topic of this thread is SouthEastern fleet replacement.
thanks
thanks

Indeed, the tenders SE have put out are open to both existing and new stock. New stock on a long contract can be cheaper than the existing Networkers as the parts are getting more difficult to get.The DfT will go with what is the best business case, they won't care if it's brand new, newer or the same old stuff. Phrases like "to address the escalating costs of Southeastern's ageing fleet" in the opportunities suggest the do nothing is rather expensive.
The inner London routes don't need flashy new trains to tempt people onto the trains. If people need to get into central London, they take the train as there are no realistic alternatives.So, that would include sticking with 30+ year old non-refurbished networkers, and no refurb in sight? For the few times I've used them, it's fair to say that the interiors are tired (at best), with an abhorrent 3+2 layout, even if the ride quality is (surprisingly) very good. Seems very counterintuitive to want to entice people back onto the railways post-covid, whilst also providing a horrible experience. Wouldn't be the first dumb decision the DfT (and subsequently the govt.) has made...
Can wise, they are almost identical.How so?
Except it's hard to see where SE can get an existing fleet from to replace their current fleet (apart from the remaining 12x 707s): the only other third rail compatible stock is needed by the other operators, and/or is also in the state of being withdrawn from service due to old age, wear and tear.Indeed, the tenders SE have put out are open to both existing and new stock. New stock on a long contract can be cheaper than the existing Networkers as the parts are getting more difficult to get.
Indeed, there isn't enough for full fleet replacement but the tenders are open to used stock.Except it's hard to see where SE can get an existing fleet from to replace their current fleet (apart from the remaining 12x 707s): the only other third rail compatible stock is needed by the other operators, and/or is also in the state of being withdrawn from service due to old age, wear and tear.
Except it's hard to see where SE can get an existing fleet from to replace their current fleet (apart from the remaining 12x 707s): the only other third rail compatible stock is needed by the other operators, and/or is also in the state of being withdrawn from service due to old age, wear and tear.
379s could displace 387s from another operator to be sent to Southeastern for example, removing 465/9s from "mainline" operations.Except it's hard to see where SE can get an existing fleet from to replace their current fleet (apart from the remaining 12x 707s): the only other third rail compatible stock is needed by the other operators, and/or is also in the state of being withdrawn from service due to old age, wear and tear.
My guess is they are still needed for LNWHow easy is adding third rail kit to 350/2s? They don't have shoebeams unlike /1s but I guess most of the underlying wiring must exist?
Such a shame that such good trains (easily with 30+ years of operation left on them) were withdrawn. GA should have kept them for StanEx, run them in 8 and 12 car formations, and give all 745/1 to the Great Eastern side (where they are frequently used to fill gaps). Another discussion for another thread really...379s could displace 387s from another operator to be sent to Southeastern for example, removing 465/9s from "mainline" operations.
There's plenty of local journeys made that don't involve heading to central London and scope for more if it didn't feel so tired, given:The inner London routes don't need flashy new trains to tempt people onto the trains. If people need to get into central London, they take the train as there are no realistic alternatives.
West Anglia was like this until 720's began replacing unloved 317's, despite an interior refresh likely fixing most of their problems. Now need the same for the stations, particularly more staff (an opinion which puts me at loggerheads with DfT for sure!)There's plenty of local journeys made that don't involve heading to central London and scope for more if it didn't feel so tired
They are going off lease soon and to be replaced by the 730s when they enter service. For the time being, there is already a thread about using existing fleets to fulfil Southeastern’s demandsMy guess is they are still needed for LNWR
The process still at the expressions of interest stage, we still need to get to preferred suppliers and then final tenders. Then all they have to do is build, test and deliver.Apologies, if I have understood this incorrectlly, but what do you mean by ‘the tenders not gone out yet’? Do you mean the deadline for submissions hasn’t arrived yet, because I think it did……in December.
...and get agreement from the traincrew that they are prepared to have the new trains as their workplace.Then all they have to do is build, test and deliver.
...and get agreement from the traincrew that they are prepared to have the new trains as their workplace.
Yes, of course on a collective basis, and plainly it is about standards, but the union and its traincrew will want something suitable for the next 35 years.This would be done on a collective basis. I don't think that anyone can refuse to drive a specific train and the union involvement is there to ensure standards are met and correct process is followed.
Yes, of course on a collective basis, and plainly it is about standards, but the union and its traincrew will want something suitable for the next 35 years.
After what happened with the 769s at Gwr and the 701s at SWR, it would be good for Southeastern to get staff representatives and Unions involved with stock selection and testing as early as possible.The traincrew don't get much choice.
Whatever stock gets decided it will be far up the chain. At the ground level it's often the case where something suitable hasn't been provided and by the time we get our hands on it, it can't be changed.
There may be a part of the process where a Driver is involved in the project but again, that's generally after the stock has been designed and specced.
We might not find out unless one of the manufacturers puts out a press release or it is mentioned at a conference. One the outcome of the tender is known then we might find out who bid depending on how the award / cancellation is announced.Has anyone heard whether any Expressions of Interest were received and if so from whom?
Has anyone heard whether any Expressions of Interest were received and if so from whom?
Networkers have had toilets since they were built. It isn't clear what happens to the 376s and 707s.
What on earth does this obscure sentence mean?Would be the most SE thing to go for CAF
It would be the most "Southeastern" thing to go for CAF. (I'll leave the latter backronym to your interpretationWhat on earth does this obscure sentence mean?
What on earth is meant by that?It would be the most "Southeastern" thing to go for CAF.
CAF the rolling stock manufacturer - has a reputation among some...What on earth is meant by that?