• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Methods of door operation and despatch and staffing onboard trains.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
4,260
Location
The West Country
it is noticeable how much more time the second person (who should be rostered on every train) on the DOO line has to deal with passengers
There’s more to working trains than punching tickets. If the second person is not a guard then it is DOO. I’m not getting into a DOO debate with anyone as I have said plenty enough in the past and as I said it’s only my opinion and nobody has to agree with it. My signature says it all.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,832
Location
London
Driver Open, guard close I would agree is the better method of operation. The slippery slope with moving to a safety critical guard with no operation at all, is eventually as you bring in more talent the ones off the street may think what is the guard actually even doing.

So when companies start offering money for no real operational risk increase, it's a lot easier to just say yes

Agreed - that would be my preference. It’s agreed at my TOC, albeit on certain stock we operate guard release is retained - it’s quicker than driver release on stock with drop lights.

That’s essentially no change indefinitely given guards didn’t traditionally have responsibility for opening doors :'(

Not sure why anyone would see that as a bad thing, or why change is necessary or desirable?

As train driver with years of experience of driving both DOO and guarded trains I value a rules competent and safety critical guard who’s actively involved in operating the train and (a key one) is responsible for dispatch. As a passenger I want exactly the same thing; that’s because I value a second person on the train, and that person being required for the train to run means A. They will be rostered to the service, and B. it’s harder to remove them next time we get a government hell bent running the railway into the ground.

The experience of Southern (GTR) shows that there is no meaningful saving from DOO if you retain a second person, so it’s a mystery why certain posters on here are so keen on it, especially when those same people claim to be against destaffing.

Whereas all I can say from 30+ years of experience, as both railway staff and passenger, is that there is no difference in safety

How much experience do you have of actually working trains?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
20,667
The trains, particularly the 3-car 755s aren’t that much quicker on local routes. Dwell times have improved no end
My observation on recent travels is that the level boarding is a major contributor to this. Boarding and alighting is so much quicker and easier for those with luggage or who are a bit slower and struggle with steps, as well as dispensing with the need for ramps (in most cases).
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
17,002
Plus the fact that 2 people are involved, so if one makes a mistake the other can mitigate it.
If a driver stops short or tries to open doors on the wrong side, these are incidents that are very much less likely with a guard.
The chances of starting against a red are much reduced as there are 2 people looking at the signal.
But having two people involved greatly increases the chance of mis-communication.
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
6,084
Location
Yorkshire
On the 185s, does the driver 'arm' the doors so they can be released once they're over the ASDO balise/metal strip in the 4 foot?
 

DMckduck

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2020
Messages
424
As train driver with years of experience of driving both DOO and guarded trains I value a rules competent and safety critical guard who’s actively involved in operating the train and (a key one) is responsible for dispatch. As a passenger I want exactly the same thing; that’s because I value a second person on the train, and that person being required for the train to run means A. They will be rostered to the service, and B.
What is also of great value which sometimes go unnoticed, is that little bit of downtime you get at stations when the guard closes. Gives you time to mark up your card, think about where you are what's next and even a drink to keep you hydrated.

Rather than focusing on cameras and dispatch corridors the whole time. Little things that the bods at head office don't think about when they see PTI incidents haven't changed with DOO yet the most common one isn't possible (RTS on red)
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,100
Location
East Anglia
My observation on recent travels is that the level boarding is a major contributor to this. Boarding and alighting is so much quicker and easier for those with luggage or who are a bit slower and struggle with steps, as well as dispensing with the need for ramps (in most cases).

Yes very much so. There are few stations now that require all that faffing around with a ramp which was another contributor to delays and excessive station dwell times. Some of those mobility scooters just roar onboard :lol:
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,359
Not sure why anyone would see that as a bad thing, or why change is necessary or desirable?
Who knows? Presumably as with almost all jobs it’s a decision for the industry & in rail’s case politicians too as to what’s considered to offer best value for money within the desired safety criteria
 
Last edited:

43066

On Moderation
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
11,832
Location
London
As with all jobs it’s a decision for the industry & also in the railway’s case politicians as to what provides the best value for money.

The industry includes all relevant bodies and stakeholders, not just TOC management, and politicians aren’t limited to the current government, of course.

It’s notable that in many areas (most recently Scotland) the eventual consensus has been to continue with a method of working that includes traditional guards.
 
Last edited:

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
5,036
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
How much experience do you have of actually working trains?

None whatsoever. But from 1986 (when DOO was first introduced in Scotland) until 2016 I worked in a operational role for the railway, in Control, part of whose function is the recording and investigation of safety incidents. And in my experience moving to DOO made no difference whatsoever to passenger safety. I would however absolutely change my view when, or rather if, statistics proving otherwise are presented, the fact that they have not speaks volumes.

It’s notable that in many areas (most recently Scotland) the eventual consensus has been to continue with a method of working that includes traditional guards.

Yet there has never, to the best of my knowledge, been any suggestion or demand from the Unions, that the many DOO routes in Scotland should return to full Guard operation.

I refer to the example I have posted elsewhere of trains from the same terminus, Glasgow Central, entirely under the control of the same signalling centre, West of Scotland, using identical stock, Class 380, to two nearby places, Neilston and Barrhead; One service has been DOO for over 30 years but the other must have a Guard, Scotrail seemingly having backed away from a confrontation with the RMT. That situation is a nonsense.
 

bahnause

Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
719
Location
bülach (switzerland)
The introduction of DOO in Switzerland led to an increase of starting against a red and had to be countered by different measures like training programmes and more sophisticated safety systems. It also affected the decision to rely on technical systems to monitor the doors. The driver is not required to check the PTI. This however might be depending on how "dangerous" the PTI is. Level boarding with sliding steps are safer than a gap and steps.

The risk of DOO is (among other factors) described in https://www.vslf.com/files/images/i...udie/131113_sbb_sicherheitsstudie_infra_d.pdf

This document is a study about the use of safety systems based on a risk assessment. Collisions after starting against a red led to several improvements like more places being equipped with ZUB (safety system), reintroduction of the four eye principle in certain cases until the lineside equipment was upgraded or the development of an iPad app, that can warn the driver if he starts agaist a red signal. DOO is mentioned as a risk factor, that had to be mitigated.
 
Last edited:

Recessio

Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,042
Location
London
I can't comment on the safety of the various systems, but having so many different variants on the national railway network is absolutely ridiculous and testament to the fragmentation of the network.
 

sansyy

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2023
Messages
232
Location
Chester
The method used on the 777s is absolutely bonkers, it’s one of the many irritating things about them.

I’m not sure what Merseyrail has mandated, but the Drivers seem to be super slow to release the doors. Theres literally no benefit to having the guard in control, quite mad.
They also cause lots of frequent train problems as especially at the beginning of their introduction many NFC devices such as phones and smart watches could break the fob readers and make the doors unusable. Just one of the many many problems these trains had at the start (and continue to have).
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,359
having so many different variants on the national railway network is absolutely ridiculous
This was explored several years ago when Arriva Rail North planned DOO & attempted to agree what method of operation best suited each particular route. but given the fragmented industry & red lines that exist it wasn’t & still isn’t easily achievable so we are where we are for who knows how long?
 
Last edited:

Efini92

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
2,010
Didn't they replace 153s among other units?


A good guard can manage their time well.


Northern's dispatch rules are absurdly tight. Other operators added intermediate door controls to their 150s and swapped the door key switches on their Pacers from the cab to the vestibules. Northern insist on only working from the rear.
The only trains I remember with the DKS still in the cab was the 155’s.
 

RHolmes

Member
Joined
19 Jul 2019
Messages
667
Another thing i do not understand is why some TOCs like LNER and Northern and TPE have policies that if a train is formed of two units without gangways then the Guard must remain in the rear unit for the entire journey.
TOCs.
There is NO requirement for TPE guards to remain in the rear set, they can swap sets if they so desire

On the 185s, does the driver 'arm' the doors so they can be released once they're over the ASDO balise/metal strip in the 4 foot?

No, for class 185 units the Conductor has full control of the doors from checking C-ASDO is functioning to releasing and closing doors. The driver has absolutely no control of any doors with the exception of their own cab/local door but can view which doors are open on their TMS

The conductor is also responsible for over-riding the C-ASDO system in the event of failure, reporting door and C-ASDO faults, as well as the locking out of individual doors or whole units.

The driver (generally) doesn’t get involved as it is the responsibility of the Conductor .
 
Joined
13 Jan 2024
Messages
423
Location
Cambridge
Yes very much so. There are few stations now that require all that faffing around with a ramp which was another contributor to delays and excessive station dwell times. Some of those mobility scooters just roar onboard :lol:
I went to Whittlesford Parkway recently and there was a pretty big gap, even with a step extended, on the up platform. It is on quite a tight curve though
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
18,100
Location
East Anglia
I went to Whittlesford Parkway recently and there was a pretty big gap, even with a step extended, on the up platform. It is on quite a tight curve though

Yes there are a few stations that still require a ramp due to height/gap issues.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Although I’ve been to Whittlesford Parkway we don’t sign beyond Cambridge so haven’t noticed it myself.
 
Joined
13 Jan 2024
Messages
423
Location
Cambridge
Yes there are a few stations that still require a ramp due to height/gap issues.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Although I’ve been to Whittlesford Parkway we don’t sign beyond Cambridge so haven’t noticed it myself.
I usually go on the diesel lines, so I was quite impressed by the acceleration on my journey from Whittlesford Parkway to Ely
 

bunnahabhain

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,193
EMR have the least restrictive operating instructions for regional Guards, we can generally dispatch from any position and can use any panel to open/close doors, as well as unit hopping on 170s in multiple, which is worth more on paper than in real life to be honest!
 

stadler

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2023
Messages
1,761
Location
Horsley
There is NO requirement for TPE guards to remain in the rear set, they can swap sets if they so desire



No, for class 185 units the Conductor has full control of the doors from checking C-ASDO is functioning to releasing and closing doors. The driver has absolutely no control of any doors with the exception of their own cab/local door but can view which doors are open on their TMS

The conductor is also responsible for over-riding the C-ASDO system in the event of failure, reporting door and C-ASDO faults, as well as the locking out of individual doors or whole units.

The driver (generally) doesn’t get involved as it is the responsibility of the Conductor .
Ah that is good to hear that TPE allows that. So it seems it is just LNER and Northern that have this policy of the Guard having to remain in the rear unit only. To be honest more all TOCs should allow this as otherwise the front unit basically becomes a free unit as the Guard will never be able to check and sell tickets in it.

Do you know if TPE have the policy of not allowing Guards to use the rear cab on anything other than 185s still? I am pretty sure i was told that on 397s and 802s and MK5As they were only permitted to use the saloon panels? This always seemed a bit ridiculous on busy trains especially as TOCs like LNER were more than happy for the cab to be used on identical trains so i always wondered why TPE were not?
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
20,667
EMR have the least restrictive operating instructions for regional Guards, we can generally dispatch from any position and can use any panel to open/close doors, as well as unit hopping on 170s in multiple, which is worth more on paper than in real life to be honest!
In stark contrast to the class 360s, where the guard has to remain in the rear unit.
 

stadler

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2023
Messages
1,761
Location
Horsley
EMR have the least restrictive operating instructions for regional Guards, we can generally dispatch from any position and can use any panel to open/close doors, as well as unit hopping on 170s in multiple, which is worth more on paper than in real life to be honest!
Southern are the same. On the 171s the Guard can use any cab panel or any saloon panel in any part of the train and can be in any unit they choose and hop between units at stations. EMR are not the only one.
 

driver9000

Established Member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
4,434
Do you know if TPE have the policy of not allowing Guards to use the rear cab on anything other than 185s still? I am pretty sure i was told that on 397s and 802s and MK5As they were only permitted to use the saloon panels?

Yes this is still the case. There are no Guards door controls in the cabs of 397s anyway.
 

TurboMan

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2022
Messages
422
Location
UK
Is the train stopped at the correct stop board?
Has the ASDO identifed the location correctly?
Has the ASDO correctly deselected doors if applicable?
Are you about to release the doors on the correct side of the train?
Agree with the 1st and 4th points but you shouldn't need to check points 2 & 3 with what is (as the name suggests) an automatic system.
 

Krokodil

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2023
Messages
4,796
Location
Wales
Agree with the 1st and 4th points but you shouldn't need to check points 2 & 3 with what is (as the name suggests) an automatic system.
Indeed, it's supposed to be a fail-safe system which should refuse to release doors unless it is sure how many. 197 ASDO requires manual override if the unit doesn't know where it is.
 

manmikey

Member
Joined
10 Feb 2014
Messages
43
Agree with the 1st and 4th points but you shouldn't need to check points 2 & 3 with what is (as the name suggests) an automatic system.
No, ASDO on 745 and 755s is a GPS based system it only knows that you have stopped in the location of the stationary what station it should be, if you stop at a signal just outside the station the ASDO system will engage and give you the option to release the doors, sometimes it doesn't know what station you have stopped at so you have to select it manually, checking is mandatory.

Regarding 3 it is also mandatory to check the ASDO has deselected doors on a platform shorter than the train, on what planet would you not check the ASDO screen to confirm the appropriate doors are locked out?
 

800301

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
372
Location
Essex
Agree with the 1st and 4th points but you shouldn't need to check points 2 & 3 with what is (as the name suggests) an automatic system.

Shouldn’t, but then look at the late notices for Class 80x SDO alterations where they can offer you the wrong door release pattern.

In a perfect world everything works right every time, ASDO is a wonderful thing but checking it’s actually got the correct door release pattern for the correct station is just good practise as spending 1/2seconds confirming the information presented to you is better than having doors released off platform, even more so when you are doing an ad-hoc move.

387’s will of course just give you the default door release pattern for that station and then after pressing release tell you it can’t pick up the SDO information

800’s will ask you to reconfirm the platform if it isn’t sure where you are but I’d rather be 100% sure in the first place but checking what platform it thinks we are at before releasing doors
 

manmikey

Member
Joined
10 Feb 2014
Messages
43
In that situation the ASDO would be irrelevant because point 1 - the correct stop board - would fail
Agreed, but this example is to highlight why ASDO can sometimes not give the correct information
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top