ExRes
Established Member
Reported on WNXX that 69012, named and in a 'special livery', is due to reveal itself on tomorrows 1259 0Z12 Eastleigh Works GBRf to Tonbridge West Yard GBRf
Indeed it looks like two-tone green, maybe with FALCON on the side.Reported on WNXX that 69012, named and in a 'special livery', is due to reveal itself on tomorrows 1259 0Z12 Eastleigh Works GBRf to Tonbridge West Yard GBRf
Correction. FALCON 2. Pictures on Facebook, Arlington Fleet Services pageIndeed it looks like two-tone green, maybe with FALCON on the side.
I always thought the Sherwood Green style on D0280, made the loco look more "bulky" than the way it was applied to the class 47 and (some) class 25.I'm not 100% as I prefer the BR two tone
Lion for the one afterKestral livery for the next one ?![]()
Calling the 56s boring old freight locos is dangerous!!I'm not 100% as I prefer the BR two tone, no getting away from it though GBRf and Arlington have turned out some really good work and put some life into boring old freight locos with the 69s, still four more to come .......
56s did a sterling serviceCalling the 56s boring old freight locos is dangerous!!
I understand there are Intellectual Property reasons why it, sadly, can't be re-used.How about LoadHaul?
I liked the "colour lift" provided by Trainload Construction motif. In bright sunshine, that variant of the "3-tone grey" really popped.or Trainload Coal.![]()
So people keep claiming but never providing any evidence. If you go to the IP website you will see any protection of the Loadhaul logo has expired and GBRf wouldn't use the Loadhaul logo anyway, just the livery which I don't think was ever protected in the first place. Additonally, even if DB did hold the IP why would they permit the use of Railfreight triple grey by GBRf but not Loadhaul?I understand there are Intellectual Property reasons why it, sadly, can't be re-used.
That makes sense, yes. Leave the logo off (although it would make the black bodyside rather austere, in my view).So people keep claiming but never providing any evidence. If you go to the IP website you will see any protection of the Loadhaul logo has expired and GBRf wouldn't use the Loadhaul logo anyway, just the livery which I don't think was ever protected in the first place.
Or replace the ‘load’ text with GBRf in the logo?That makes sense, yes. Leave the logo off (although it would make the black bodyside rather austere, in my view).
DB own the Trainload Petroleum and Trainload Construction logos, both of which are live and registered UK trademarks and both of which are used by GBRf. Which further supports the notion that it's not an IP issue.So people keep claiming but never providing any evidence. If you go to the IP website you will see any protection of the Loadhaul logo has expired and GBRf wouldn't use the Loadhaul logo anyway, just the livery which I don't think was ever protected in the first place. Additonally, even if DB did hold the IP why would they permit the use of Railfreight triple grey by GBRf but not Loadhaul?
Absolutely. Backbone of the UKs coal network along with the 58s (being the actual bones... )56s did a sterling service
Ha Ha Ha.Like this? View attachment 161716
Or perhaps GBRf have taste and think Loadhaul is what it actually was: a pretty poor livery. Mainline Freught blue was far better.So people keep claiming but never providing any evidence. If you go to the IP website you will see any protection of the Loadhaul logo has expired and GBRf wouldn't use the Loadhaul logo anyway, just the livery which I don't think was ever protected in the first place. Additonally, even if DB did hold the IP why would they permit the use of Railfreight triple grey by GBRf but not Loadhaul?
That’s your opinion, there are many people including me that are big fans of the LoadHaul livery. Just because you dislike loadhaul doesn’t mean everyone does.Or perhaps GBRf have taste and think Loadhaul is what it actually was: a pretty poor livery. Mainline Freught blue was far better.
By the same logic, just because yourself and many others like it, doesn't mean everyone does.That’s your opinion, there are many people including me that are big fans of the LoadHaul livery. Just because you dislike loadhaul doesn’t mean everyone does.
By the same logic, just because yourself and many others like it, doesn't mean everyone does.
I quite like it myself, but I think in part it's because the other "shadow FOC" liveries were worse... including Mainline Blue. By far the worst was Transrail which didn't even bother with a livery, just slapped a lazy logo (a big T in a circle? How much did that cost in branding consultancy?!) over the top of whatever livery the loco was in.
LoadHaul is almost "too obvious" at this point because so many people are hoping for it... I almost hope it doesn't happen just to irk the fanboys!![]()
Here it is running from Hoo-Eastleigh just now.69012 should be on the Eastleigh-hoo freight services for the rest of this week