Is this referring to people moving along the platform from the seated portion of the main train to the carriages that stay in Scotland from/to FW?It's open (after a fashion) to allow people to board the Fort William portion.
Is this referring to people moving along the platform from the seated portion of the main train to the carriages that stay in Scotland from/to FW?It's open (after a fashion) to allow people to board the Fort William portion.
Is this referring to people moving along the platform from the seated portion of the main train to the carriages that stay in Scotland from/to FW?
Indeed.No, you can actually enter the station to board the FW portion, it also runs as a regular day train between Edinburgh and FW in both directions.
Why should passengers be allowed to board the Southbound Highland Sleeper at Edinburgh? I assume your use case is travel to Preston or Crewe?What has frustrated me in the past is that passengers aren't allowed to board the southbound Highland Sleeper at Edinburgh.
Waverley station is closed for entry before the passengers could board the relevant portion of the Highland sleeper. The last departure is the 2356 to Bathgate.I don't know what would happen if you tried to get on at Edinburgh with a ticket booked from Inverkeithing (there's a risk a cabin would be reallocated, but a seat can't be)
I'm assuming that in this modern age it isn't possible to detach 1 carriage and leave it in a platform for a few hours?Its farcical to suggest getting them off when the Highlander arrives in to split.
Not without something providing ETS.I'm assuming that in this modern age it isn't possible to detach 1 carriage and leave it in a platform for a few hours?
Nope - in the cases I've heard about it's because the lowland was fully booked and the people wanted to go all the way to London.I assume your use case is travel to Preston or Crewe?
sure, but (as one example) there's a 00:22 arrival from Tweedbank. Why shouldn't someone from Galashiels be allowed to use the Highland Sleeper and connect at Edinburgh?The last departure is the 2356 to Bathgate.
Waverley station is closed for entry before the passengers could board the relevant portion of the Highland sleeper.
And I'm guessing no shore supply exists within the confines of Waverley!Not without something providing ETS.
The key word is entry. Thats not to say it couldn't be facilitated but currently it isn't.The last arrival into Edinburgh is 01:03, which is after the Sleeper arrives. Presumably the station needs staff until all passenger trains have arrived, so to say
is surely wrong?Waverley station is closed for entry before the passengers could board the relevant portion of the Highland sleeper. The last departure is the 2356 to Bathgate.
The key word is entry. Thats not to say it couldn't be facilitated but currently it isn't.
pragmatically, I don't know what would happen if you tried to get on at Edinburgh with a ticket booked from Inverkeithing
Full speed is only 87mph on a 125mph mainline, though.
If the mk5s travelled at 100mph it would be absolutely unbearable both noise and rough riding.
Exactly my point from earlier about its exclusion from the main (Scotrail) timetable. Passengers on the route are denied sensible knowledge of the full service on offer on a sparsely-served route.No, you can actually enter the station to board the FW portion, it also runs as a regular day train between Edinburgh and FW in both directions.
I thought 92s had been used for years now.Fair points. Maybe it's just as well the Sleepers are now hauled by 92s rather than 90s!
It has, 92s are the only compatible electric locos that can couple and provide enough ETS to power the coaches.Exactly my point from earlier about its exclusion from the main (Scotrail) timetable. Passengers on the route are denied sensible knowledge of the full service on offer on a sparsely-served route.
I thought 92s had been used for years now.
I thought 92s had been used for years now.
The 92s started in use before the Mark 3s were gone and were used in parallel with the 90s for a while.Since the Mark 5 stock replaced the Mark 3s, so 2019.
The 92s started in use before the Mark 3s were gone and were used in parallel with the 90s for a while.
That would have been the last few months of the highlander and MK3s?Fair enough. I had 90043 and 90044 in April 2019!
Lowlander started with MK5s on a Sunday night ECML run and it was a complete disaster of a 'launch', the Southbound train ended up being about 3 hours late into London.I have a note that says the Lowlander went over to mk5 operation in late April 2019. As for as The Highlander is concerned 1S25's last run with mk3 was the night of 8/9 October and 1M16 was the following night.
That would have been the last few months of the highlander and MK3s?
I was on that final 1S25 / 1A25, shivering in the Mark 2 seated coach. It was a 90 that night. At least I got to enjoy a bit of thrash from an open droplight when the pair of 73s took over.As for as The Highlander is concerned 1S25's last run with mk3 was the night of 8/9 October and 1M16 was the following night.
I was surprised to see all the sleeping cars in the old "Barbie" FirstGroup livery. Some Mk3s made it into their final livery (in the video, one of the Mk2fs wears it)Last ever mk3 service arrived in London morning of 10th October 2019.
I think only 5 or 6 made it into the green livery, they were used in a photo shoot for when Serco took over.I was surprised to see all the sleeping cars in the old "Barbie" FirstGroup livery. Some Mk3s made it into their final livery (in the video, one of the Mk2fs wears it)
People wanting to stay on a train thats arrived at its terminating station that they've been on for 10-12+ hours is an absolute nonsense imo.Drivers being granted permission to run at maximum permissible speeds will account for continued early arrival into Euston and subsequent passive aggressive pressure to vacate the train ASAP.
Sorry, I completely disagree. The lowland leaves Glasgow Central at 23.45 and I've been kicked off at around 06.15, that's not 10 - 12 hours. Personally I don't see anything wrong with being wakened upon arrival and enjoying my 'breakfast' then too, being able to have that, get dressed and leave the train at my pace.People wanting to stay on a train thats arrived at its terminating station that they've been on for 10-12+ hours is an absolute nonsense imo.
Run at 80mph all the way and everyone gets off on arrival, its a train, not a hotel with a late checkout option.
They can get on at 22:00 in Glasgow, thats plenty time on board.Sorry, I completely disagree. The lowland leaves Glasgow Central at 23.45 and I've been kicked off at around 06.15, that's not 10 - 12 hours. Personally I don't see anything wrong with being wakened upon arrival and enjoying my 'breakfast' then too, being able to have that, get dressed and leave the train at my pace.
Nothing else is open in the vicinity of Euston at 06.15. Even taking my time strolling to St. Pancras can see me standing outside their Wetherspoon's waiting on it opening up.
As we all know, Serco was at pains to let everyone know that the Sleeper was a "hotel on wheels".
You must presumably be unaware that their website (which most people book through) advertises a "vacate room by" time which is generally much later, usually 07:30. It is entirely reasonable to hold CS to this. If they don't want to abide by it, they shouldn't advertise it.People wanting to stay on a train thats arrived at its terminating station that they've been on for 10-12+ hours is an absolute nonsense imo.
It's absolutely marketed and priced as a hotel on wheels and - supposedly - a luxury experience. Indeed their website explicitly notes that you are saving CO2 emissions compared to getting a hotel room.It's not a hotel on wheels. It never has been, and it never will be no matter how they dress it up. Its a train that gets you from A to B and nothing more.
There is an advertised checkout time. It's not a "late" checkout if you stay until then!Run at 80mph all the way and everyone gets off on arrival, its a train, not a hotel with a late checkout option.
If boarding begins on time. In any event, not everyone will be able to board that early, and not everyone will be happy with getting less than 8 hours' sleep/rest (bearing in mind you will want to shower, eat, use the loo etc.)They can get on at 22:00 in Glasgow, thats plenty time on board.
It is marketed as a "unique way to travel". An alternative to a hotel, not a hotel in itself.It's absolutely marketed and priced as a hotel on wheels and - supposedly - a luxury experience. Indeed their website explicitly notes that you are saving CO2 emissions compared to getting a hotel room.
There is CS lounge at Euston.Sorry, I completely disagree. The lowland leaves Glasgow Central at 23.45 and I've been kicked off at around 06.15, that's not 10 - 12 hours. Personally I don't see anything wrong with being wakened upon arrival and enjoying my 'breakfast' then too, being able to have that, get dressed and leave the train at my pace.