D365
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 12,249
Wetherby has a population just over 10,000, so qualifies.
Depending on how you treat the Peterlee-Horden "conurbation" you might add Peterlee to this list too - some sources consider it and Horden to be distinct places.In the North East, there's Washington (68,000), Blyth (until this? year) (40,000), Consett (30,000), Spennymoor (20,000), Stanley (19,000), Whickham (17,000), Ryton (16,000), Houghton-le-Spring (14,000), Hetton-le-Hole (12,000), Crook (10,000) and Ponteland (10,000).
Though Dudley will soon get the metro.Dudley in the West Midlands. Yes There are Sandwell & Dudley and Dudley Port stations but they are several miles away. Dudley used to have a station of its own until the 60's on the lines from Walsall, Stourbridge and Wolverhampton but that is long gone.
Oxford Parkway is just within Cherwell DC, the Oxford City boundary is just after the golf course. Technically within Gosford and Water Eaton Parish, so still not Kidlington.How about a nice bit of controversy - Kidlington (pop 13000). Oxford Parkway just to the south of the southern extremity, but it's not named for Kidlington and is in a different local government administration (Cherwell DC Vs Oxford City Council).
The original Kidlington station was right at the northern end of the settlement, and no more convenient for most of the residents than OXP is.
Wallingford 44,000, only has a very poor bus connection to Cholsey.
Ah, I thought the A34 was the boundary.Oxford Parkway is just within Cherwell DC, the Oxford City boundary is just after the golf course. Technically within Gosford and Water Eaton Parish, so still not Kidlington.
Source for that?Wallingford 44,000, only has a very poor bus connection to Cholsey.
Although the Melton-Nottingham line went right through it, West Bridgford never had a station. Presumably too close to Nottingham to be worthwhile, like a lot of the places mentioned on this thread (that is close to other places with stations, not close to Nottingham!).Shropshire
Oswestry (17,105)
Market Drayton (10,407)
Nottinghamshire
West Bridgford (45,509)
Arnold (37,768)
Clifton (22,407) (although it's served by the tram)
Eastwood (18,422)
Stapleford (16,190)
Kimberley (11,353)
Derbyshire
Swadlincote (45,000)
Ripley (20,807)
Staveley (18,247)
Eckington (11,855)
Staffordshire
Newcastle-Under-Lyme (75,082)
Burntwood (28,553)
Leek (19,624)
Biddulph (17,669)
No mention yet of Plympton in Devon which not only has a population of nearly 30 000 but has a railway running through the middle and, as yet, no plans to re-open the station.
Places like West Bridgford are only technically "without a station" due to the unusually tight boundaries of Nottingham city (which are currently under review). The northernmost boundary of West Bridgford is less than a mile from Nottingham station by road - meanwhile I'm located more than three miles from Nottingham station and nearly two miles from Bulwell station despite being well within the city boundary! Even the very centre of West Bridgford is closer to Nottingham station than I am to Bulwell.Shropshire
Oswestry (17,105)
Market Drayton (10,407)
Nottinghamshire
West Bridgford (45,509)
Arnold (37,768)
Clifton (22,407) (although it's served by the tram)
Eastwood (18,422)
Stapleford (16,190)
Kimberley (11,353)
Derbyshire
Swadlincote (45,000)
Ripley (20,807)
Staveley (18,247)
Eckington (11,855)
Staffordshire
Newcastle-Under-Lyme (75,082)
Burntwood (28,553)
Leek (19,624)
Biddulph (17,669)
Monmouth (11,040)Shropshire
Oswestry (17,105)
Market Drayton (10,407)
I think Rawtenstall, Ramsbottom, Bo'ness, Caernarfon and Swanage in that category have more than 10,000 people each as well.Midsomer Norton and Bridgenorth are contenders for a different crown - largest settlement with only a heritage railway station.
That place used to have a higher population but DCI Barnaby kept rocking upMidsomer Norton (13K) makes it to the list on its own. Add in Radstock and Westfield (the three are contiguous and a single settlement in all but name - though I’m sure some locals will disagree!) you get to about 28K.
Immingham's another one, whilst on the topic of things which are almost Barnetby.DCI Barnaby
Agree - there is no way it is anything like 44000, but Wallingford Town Council (at: https://www.wallingfordtowncouncil.gov.uk/your-council/town-council/) does state:Source for that?
The ONS built up area 2021 figure for Wallingford is 8455.
Wallingford Town Council is the parish authority for Wallingford, which has a population of over 11,600.
Yes apologies for the above, I’m not entirely sure where I found the 44,000 figure to be honest, going back to my search to doesn’t seem to show up anymore…Agree - there is no way it is anything like 44000, but Wallingford Town Council (at: https://www.wallingfordtowncouncil.gov.uk/your-council/town-council/) does state:
which would bring them into this, assuming we are disregarding heritage stations.
Adjacent to Heckmondwike are the other Spen Valley towns of Cleckheaton and Liversedge which were formerly along the same line/s and both also have populations of over 10000.I know there's Heckmondwike which i think used to have a railway line but then the beeching axe appeared
I sort of knew that West Bridgford would be a funny one when I included it. Wikipedia shows it as a settlement in its own right which I'd say goes with the OPs criteria as it doesnt have a station of its own, but I do understand that its proximity to Nottingham Station itself would make it unnecessary for it to need one, especially with the bus connectionsPlaces like West Bridgford are only technically "without a station" due to the unusually tight boundaries of Nottingham city (which are currently under review). The northernmost boundary of West Bridgford is less than a mile from Nottingham station by road - meanwhile I'm located more than three miles from Nottingham station and nearly two miles from Bulwell station despite being well within the city boundary! Even the very centre of West Bridgford is closer to Nottingham station than I am to Bulwell.
So in practical terms it's pretty odd to define places as "without a station" when they are closer to a station than many places defined as "with a station"!