Recent content by 20052534

If you don't have anything to say other than calling me a liar, you may as well go to someone else's thread and accuse them.

Yeah I can understand that. How many people do you think actually do fall asleep with their earphones in? Classic human mistake

Yes, when the ticket inspector walked passed me he said after he woke me (by nudging me on the shoulder) that he tried asking me for a ticket several times... obviously I did not hear him because I was asleep and had my earphones in. I wrote this in my first letter also. Edit: hence why he had...

iPod in... Maybe my phone was on silent - I don't remember

I swear I read somewhere that if someone is being cautioned that it must be done privately to align with either PACE or Data Protection Act --- old post above --- --- new post below --- In the email I received from XC "An MG11 is a witness statement taken when a person has been cautioned for...

To prove that I was asleep? Could I not then argue that perhaps that's why they weren't kept, because it didn't help them, and it showed that I was in fact asleep?

If he is cautioning me for an offence, he has to do so in a private place, not in the carriage. It says so on XC's Policy of prosecutions... That's why he said to me "I'm giving you this 'No Ticket?' card because I didn't want my actions to be seen as harassment! Had he have done what he was...

So surely they would have kept it then?

But if youre suggesting imagery of me being asleep, then surely it would see what else happened given that I was not taken to a more private place to discuss the matter? Agreed... I was naïve on the day... I don't deny that!

And I thought it was me being naïve... How could anyone pretend to be asleep for 2 hours, maybe more without opening their eyes or 'appearing' to wake up :lol:

The guard did not take my details. I could have got off at Cheltenham, bought a ticket and travelled further. It is because I stayed on that he took my details. My friend agreed to take me back... I understand this now, but at the time I wasn't thinking that way :| --- old post above --- ---...

How would someone 'appear to be asleep' for 2 hours?

Is the witness not supposed to write everything down there and then, have me agree to it and then sign it so that nothing else can be written? because this did not happen... on the witnesses 'report of irregular travelling' which was received in the summons pack it is dated 16th December

Of what, what happened? I doubt they would have this footage now... But why would that help?

I wouldn't say there were any different 'versions', why? because I said Cheltenham to Bristol, to simplify what I meant? But he said to pay for something!!! Why would he say that if I then could not? Why would the person I spoke to on the phone think it was an UFN? On the Zero-Fare ticket he...