Could the delay in introducing the MK5's on the Highlands services have anything to do with possibly heading off industrial conflicts if the staff issues on the Lowlands isn't sorted by then
GWR still check-in the old way and works fine AFAIK - if it isn't broke don't try to fix it !Just out of interest, does anyone on here know what the rationale was for introducing the new check-in system early in 2018? Unfortunately, I feel that CS might have ended up trying to fix something that wasn't actually broken; I often overhear crews saying it creates more unnecessary work (particularly with the breakfast order cards which they now have to collect). I also feel that passengers seemed to like the experience of having their own 'personal' carriage host.
Well, I suppose indirectly in that crews are unhappy about technical issues on the trains and that they've been inadequately trained to deal with them. If the Lowlander runs as it should and with properly trained teams operating it, then the new stock can be introduced on the Highlander...Could the delay in introducing the MK5's on the Highlands services have anything to do with possibly heading off industrial conflicts if the staff issues on the Lowlands isn't sorted by then
GWR still check-in the old way and works fine AFAIK - if it isn't broke don't try to fix it !
Short answer - no.Could the delay in introducing the MK5's on the Highlands services have anything to do with possibly heading off industrial conflicts if the staff issues on the Lowlands isn't sorted by then
What staff issues?
I don't know the rationale but I know the current system of disorderly and fractious queuing at Euston doesn't work. It turns into a rabble with people not realising there are two seperate queues for Inverness and Aberdeen/Fort William. Although you are checked off the list no one actually asks whether or not you've travelled before, if you need any help finding your berth or explains the system to you. The breakfast cards are ok but on my last trip the wee pencil lead was broken so I had to walk from coach G all the way to the lounge car to borrow some sort of writing implement, once I'd filled it out there I asked if I could leave it with the Lounge host and was told no, I'd have to take it back to my room and hang it on the door to be collected and taken back to the Lounge....Just out of interest, does anyone on here know what the rationale was for introducing the new check-in system early in 2018? Unfortunately, I feel that CS might have ended up trying to fix something that wasn't actually broken; I often overhear crews saying it creates more unnecessary work (particularly with the breakfast order cards which they now have to collect). I also feel that passengers seemed to like the experience of having their own 'personal' carriage host.
Flying doesn't give you a bed for the night or the fantastic scenery
I'm deaf. Does that make it OK if no one talks to any passengers?I couldn't give a stuff when they stop responding on Twitter as a I don't use it, but packing up after trains have departed seems reasonable.
Yeah, St Pancras is 100 yards closer - should've told them to go there.Late departure from Euston tonight for the lowlander, staff again are clueless aswell as there being no toilets available at Euston and they're telling people to go to Kings Cross...
I don't know the rationale but I know the current system of disorderly and fractious queuing at Euston doesn't work. It turns into a rabble with people not realising there are two seperate queues for Inverness and Aberdeen/Fort William. Although you are checked off the list no one actually asks whether or not you've travelled before, if you need any help finding your berth or explains the system to you. The breakfast cards are ok but on my last trip the wee pencil lead was broken so I had to walk from coach G all the way to the lounge car to borrow some sort of writing implement, once I'd filled it out there I asked if I could leave it with the Lounge host and was told no, I'd have to take it back to my room and hang it on the door to be collected and taken back to the Lounge....
I'm sure you have it correct.This is quite a difficult one for the crew, as they suppose (whether rightly or wrongly) that passengers may be asleep late at night and in the early hours and are probably afraid of waking passengers unnecessarily. They perhaps take the view that passengers who are worried about the delay will press the blue button in their berth to call them, and that otherwise, the passengers will be happy simply to be advised of the ETA and extent of the delay when they get their morning tea/breakfast. This probably explains why there is no public address system on the Mk3 sets (although I'm told Mk5s do have this?) so no announcements. That said, many infrequent travellers are not certain as to where to go to find staff, or how to call the host; clearer information on check-in would certainly help in this regard. Ideally, the on-train staff are much better placed to help the passengers once they're actually on board than anyone manning the Twitter feed. Under the old, more personal check-in system (which I miss), the host assigned to your carriage would ask you whether you wanted to be informed of any delays during the journey (certainly the Inverness crews all did this), which I suspect some passengers found useful. I'm sure I'm not alone in finding the current check-in system very perfunctory (I'm sure first-time travellers must find this particularly so), and that this gives travellers unfamiliar with the sleeper the impression that there are no or few staff to help them.
It isn't a mess, really, and flying is not appealing IMHO.....Looking at this thread, the whole thing seems like a total mess! Flying appeals far more.
Last week on the highlander with an ECML diversion I was in the bar car, train left slowly, stopped at wembley (?) sidings for 15 mins or so, then eventually slowly restarted apparently to most, heading back towards Euston. This caused mass confusion to many in the bar, but staff too busy to explain, and (thankfully IMHO), no pointless tannoy announcements to tell people what was going on, as we were all to schedule as per RTT info. I explained to the people sitting opposite me - but I must have been speaking loud enough for other nearby tables to hear - that the train had to be cleared of Euston, was now reversing onto another route across north london and then heading north, and it didn't matter as we all had beds to sleep in comfortably and the only issue to concern oneself about was where we were in the morning, not where we were now! A lady sitting a table or so away was most grateful for the info and said, 'you should have been making a public announcement'.
On my last trip as well as the diversion via the East Coast, which caused very similar consternation in the lounge car to what you describe when the train reversed, we then sat in Copenhagen Tunnel for just over an hour because of a failed LNER train at Finsbury Park. I knew what was going on because I have ways and means of finding out but it was apparent that the lounge host neither knew nor made any effort to find out why we were stopped or when we might be going again. In fairness he was dealing with a very busy Sunday night crowd but almost everyone was asking him what was happening and he just kept saying that he didn't have a clue; also the card reader didn't have a signal and wasn't connecting to his ordering ipad (presumably because we were in the tunnel) so no one was able to pay for anything by card. It all just seemed a little bit shambolic.Last week on the highlander with an ECML diversion I was in the bar car, train left slowly, stopped at wembley (?) sidings for 15 mins or so, then eventually slowly restarted apparently to most, heading back towards Euston. This caused mass confusion to many in the bar, but staff too busy to explain, and (thankfully IMHO), no pointless tannoy announcements to tell people what was going on, as we were all to schedule as per RTT info. I explained to the people sitting opposite me - but I must have been speaking loud enough for other nearby tables to hear - that the train had to be cleared of Euston, was now reversing onto another route across north london and then heading north, and it didn't matter as we all had beds to sleep in comfortably and the only issue to concern oneself about was where we were in the morning, not where we were now! A lady sitting a table or so away was most grateful for the info and said, 'you should have been making a public announcement'.
I assumed it was brought in as part of the 'hotel on wheels' conceit. In a hotel you check in at reception then you find your room. Thing is, it's not a hotel, it's an overnight train, and in fact it has something a hotel doesn't, which is someome dedicated to looking after your carriage through the journey. The check-in system manages to make people unaware of this, gets them to fill in forms to hang on the door for collection by an anonymous entity, and leaves them trying to get information via twitter.Just out of interest, does anyone on here know what the rationale was for introducing the new check-in system early in 2018? Unfortunately, I feel that CS might have ended up trying to fix something that wasn't actually broken; I often overhear crews saying it creates more unnecessary work (particularly with the breakfast order cards which they now have to collect). I also feel that passengers seemed to like the experience of having their own 'personal' carriage host.
I assumed it was brought in as part of the 'hotel on wheels' conceit. In a hotel you check in at reception then you find your room. Thing is, it's not a hotel, it's an overnight train, and in fact it has something a hotel doesn't, which is someome dedicated to looking after your carriage through the journey. The check-in system manages to make people unaware of this, gets them to fill in forms to hang on the door for collection by an anonymous entity, and leaves them trying to get information via twitter.
Seems to me like a fixing (or breaking) of something that wasn't broken.
That is exactly the sort of farce which I find ensues every time at Euston... a recent (and pointless, in my view) development (since October 2018) is giving first class passengers 'priority boarding', so that if you have a First Class ticket, the Duty Manager on the platform checks your name off the list before the train is due to board (i.e. before 20:30) and tells you that you can walk down the platform to find your coach (but cannot board as the doors are still, quite rightly, locked). The problem is, the on-train staff (understandably) don't want you on the platform while they're doing their pre-boarding checks so they send you back where you started, that's absolutely fair. Then you get a bemused (and sometimes exasperated) look from the duty manager who tries to send you down the platform again... you do wonder why the duty manager doesn't liaise with the on-train staff to see when they're ready to receive any passengers, that would save no end of hassle. Bizarrely, you don't get treated to 'priority boarding' if you're in first class and board at one of the Scottish termini, though this may actually be a blessing rather than a curse. I've now taken to pretending to the duty manager at Euston that I'm in standard to avoid this bizarre carry-on (walking up and down platform 1 at Euston like a yo-yo with heavy luggage is not many people's idea of fun). This 'priority boarding' is clearly something which was dreamt up by someone in an office (perhaps as another way of justifying premium First Class fares, or perhaps as a way of stopping a huge queue from building up at the platform end which looked good on paper?) without much of a clue as to how it could be implemented in reality, and which puts needless pressure on staff... it's obvious, because of a whole host of operational reasons, that the Highlander cannot start boarding until 20:30.
Once that farce is complete, you can then enjoy an amazing journey (and a fabulous run it is too up to either Fort William or Inverness).
Lots of the bid thinking appears to have been copy n paste from the Ghan operating experience as that was apparently the Gold standard. Whether is was applicable or not to the UK or Cally Sleeper is another matter...Seems to me like a fixing (or breaking) of something that wasn't broken.
Making an announcement is probably not the done thing on a night train, but they could have leaflets printed to put in the rooms and on the lounge car tables warning of the diversion.
I agree engaging in protracted twitter discussions at 2am isn’t practical
Isn't it? A number of TOCs now have a 24 hour Twitter service.
It could reduce the pressure on the on-train staff who already have their hands full instead of them answering the same question over and over and over again and I don't know if you've heard, but things like twitter do work from places other than customer service centres, so it could be handed over to someone on a train when the centre shuts if wanted. As others have hinted, having individual accounts or webpages for each train and updating on-board displays could be a cool double-purpose of it.Maybe twitter has a role, but what's the point in tweeting some remote customer service centre, who can't do anything more than is already being done to get to the destination on time?