• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

London Overground train cancelled due to an issue with lineside vegetation

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlanFry1

Member
Joined
17 Nov 2011
Messages
662
Odd? The 1815 Liverpool st to Cheshunt this evening was cancelled due to 'Line side Vegetation'

what does that mean?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
1,608
Location
All around the network
I can confirm, there are overgrowing tree branches just out of Liverpool street that I remember the train hitting and hearing a loud thwack some time ago. They have to cut them every so often, they do grow back.
 
Last edited:

BJames

Established Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
1,365
I can confirm, there are overgrowing tree beaches just out of Liverpool street that I remember the train hitting and hearing a loud thwack some time ago. They have to cut them every so often, they do grow back.
According to NRE this evening though, this particular incident was a tree on the line between Clapton and St James Street. I had a look on Open Train Times and there was indeed a block on the line in between these two stations in the London Bound direction earlier.

Also looks like a couple of the Cheshunt services were turned around to become Enfield's instead of Chingford services at Liverpool Street... no point them just blocking platforms at Liverpool Street.

Edit: Sorry - just beaten to it
 

Joe Paxton

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2017
Messages
2,465
In this case, "Tree on the line" would have been a better reason to give than the more opaque "Line side Vegetation".
 

Re 4/4

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2018
Messages
181
Location
Bristol
I agree. "line side vegetation" might be a valid reporting code for internal delay attribution, but plain English is always good when talking to the public. After all, lineside vegetation could be leaves on the line (unless that goes under "poor adhesion").
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,355
I agree. "line side vegetation" might be a valid reporting code for internal delay attribution, but plain English is always good when talking to the public. After all, lineside vegetation could be leaves on the line (unless that goes under "poor adhesion").

As far as I can see, all official public facing outlets referred to it as tree on the line or obstruction on the track. The only public source mentioning line side vegetation is real time trains - presumably from directly translating delay attribution codes.
 

Edders23

Member
Joined
22 Sep 2018
Messages
549
As much as they are good for screening the tracks and soaking up CO2 are the benefits really outweighed by the constant problems with leaf fall and trees on the line this was not the only major disruption this month caused by a falling tree is the cost of removal or regular pruning that expensive in comparison ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top