• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Are the lnwr 350/4 specific to any route

Status
Not open for further replies.

Impey0711

On Moderation
Joined
16 Sep 2013
Messages
281
On the 8:55 Nuneaton to crewe on Saturday wondering if it will be a 350/4
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
29,305
Location
Fenny Stratford
Are the lnwr 350/4 specific to any route

yes: they are specific to any LNWR service on the west coast.

Your train from Nuneaton is just as likely to be a 350/2
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
4,358
Your guess is as good as mine. So far as I can see, the 350s are all used in one common pool.

That is my understanding of it as well. There definitely doesn't seem to be any grouping of sub-classes for any specific routes
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,355
Location
Edinburgh
That is my understanding of it as well. There definitely doesn't seem to be any grouping of sub-classes for any specific routes

Weren't the 350/2 initially meant to be for suburban services only? Such as Wolverhampton - Walsall, London - Tring/MKC/Northampton. But then they decided to ditch it and have them in a common pool.
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
4,358
Weren't the 350/2 initially meant to be for suburban services only? Such as Wolverhampton - Walsall, London - Tring/MKC/Northampton. But then they decided to ditch it and have them in a common pool.

Based on the seating layout I would suspect that was initially the case, with the 350/1s working the Euston-North West services but it's been any unit on any route for quite a while now
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,355
Location
Edinburgh
Based on the seating layout I would suspect that was initially the case, with the 350/1s working the Euston-North West services but it's been any unit on any route for quite a while now

I feel sorry for anyone who gets booked on the Liverpool - Euston and ends up with a 350/2!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I feel sorry for anyone who gets booked on the Liverpool - Euston and ends up with a 350/2!

Because that's the concatenation of two local services that is highly likely. While the units seem to be in a common pool you do seem to get more 2+2 seated units on the Trent Valley semifasts than elsewhere, though it's not 100%.

That said, it's not all bad. LNR's long distance stuff, at least at weekends, carries a disproportionately large number of families and groups. For these, the bays of 6 (which are very well spaced indeed) are vastly preferable to the mostly airline layout of a /1, /3 or /4. You've also got the fact that with 3+2 you can have 3 people across the width of the train before you have to sit next to someone, whereas with 2+2 it's only two.

They're also the same seats (other than the design of the upper seat back) so unless you're bothered about armrests, if you sit in a non-window seat and nobody is next to you the experience for your backside between the two types is basically the same.
 

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
4,529
Because that's the concatenation of two local services that is highly likely. While the units seem to be in a common pool you do seem to get more 2+2 seated units on the Trent Valley semifasts than elsewhere, though it's not 100%.

That said, it's not all bad. LNR's long distance stuff, at least at weekends, carries a disproportionately large number of families and groups. For these, the bays of 6 (which are very well spaced indeed) are vastly preferable to the mostly airline layout of a /1, /3 or /4. You've also got the fact that with 3+2 you can have 3 people across the width of the train before you have to sit next to someone, whereas with 2+2 it's only two.

They're also the same seats (other than the design of the upper seat back) so unless you're bothered about armrests, if you sit in a non-window seat and nobody is next to you the experience for your backside between the two types is basically the same.
Or tables.
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,355
Location
Edinburgh
Because that's the concatenation of two local services that is highly likely. While the units seem to be in a common pool you do seem to get more 2+2 seated units on the Trent Valley semifasts than elsewhere, though it's not 100%.

That said, it's not all bad. LNR's long distance stuff, at least at weekends, carries a disproportionately large number of families and groups. For these, the bays of 6 (which are very well spaced indeed) are vastly preferable to the mostly airline layout of a /1, /3 or /4. You've also got the fact that with 3+2 you can have 3 people across the width of the train before you have to sit next to someone, whereas with 2+2 it's only two.

They're also the same seats (other than the design of the upper seat back) so unless you're bothered about armrests, if you sit in a non-window seat and nobody is next to you the experience for your backside between the two types is basically the same.


I’m a sucker for armrests, as it feels weird just leaving my arms to not rest on anything. I can do it for short suburban journeys but not a long one
 

TiedUpInNotts

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2019
Messages
22
Location
Wolves
Weren't the 350/2 initially meant to be for suburban services only? Such as Wolverhampton - Walsall, London - Tring/MKC/Northampton. But then they decided to ditch it and have them in a common pool.

It's my understanding that since the 350/2s were upgraded for 110mph running there was no longer an issue about running them any great distance on the mainline so they tend to turn up a lot more frequently on long distance routes now. As a regular user of the WMT locals it quite nice as we get far more 1,3 and 4s than we used to.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,266
Location
West of Andover
Weren't the 350/2 initially meant to be for suburban services only? Such as Wolverhampton - Walsall, London - Tring/MKC/Northampton. But then they decided to ditch it and have them in a common pool.

I think with the current timetable service interworks, so an unit could arrive from Tring then form the next Crewe.

In my experience most passengers if given the option between a 350/2 & other subclass on a pairing will aim for the other subclass. So that the 350/1 can be full and standing with the 350/2 empty
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,895
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I think with the current timetable service interworks, so an unit could arrive from Tring then form the next Crewe.

In my experience most passengers if given the option between a 350/2 & other subclass on a pairing will aim for the other subclass. So that the 350/1 can be full and standing with the 350/2 empty

Certainly people tend to go for a non /2 if there are seats. I think your observation of it being full and standing may be due to other factors such as an unwillingness to walk to the front of a 12-car at Euston (or back on yourself at the bottom of the long platforms) or because the /2 was added at Northampton.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,266
Location
West of Andover
Certainly people tend to go for a non /2 if there are seats. I think your observation of it being full and standing may be due to other factors such as an unwillingness to walk to the front of a 12-car at Euston (or back on yourself at the bottom of the long platforms) or because the /2 was added at Northampton.

Mainly 8 coach units between New Street & Coventry.
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
4,905
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
Who allocates the units to diagrams at start of day from maintenance locations, TOC or Siemens? The /2 have specific diagrams on paper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top