On the 8:55 Nuneaton to crewe on Saturday wondering if it will be a 350/4
Your train from Nuneaton is just as likely to be a 350/2
Your guess is as good as mine. So far as I can see, the 350s are all used in one common pool.
That is my understanding of it as well. There definitely doesn't seem to be any grouping of sub-classes for any specific routes
Weren't the 350/2 initially meant to be for suburban services only? Such as Wolverhampton - Walsall, London - Tring/MKC/Northampton. But then they decided to ditch it and have them in a common pool.
Based on the seating layout I would suspect that was initially the case, with the 350/1s working the Euston-North West services but it's been any unit on any route for quite a while now
I feel sorry for anyone who gets booked on the Liverpool - Euston and ends up with a 350/2!
Or tables.Because that's the concatenation of two local services that is highly likely. While the units seem to be in a common pool you do seem to get more 2+2 seated units on the Trent Valley semifasts than elsewhere, though it's not 100%.
That said, it's not all bad. LNR's long distance stuff, at least at weekends, carries a disproportionately large number of families and groups. For these, the bays of 6 (which are very well spaced indeed) are vastly preferable to the mostly airline layout of a /1, /3 or /4. You've also got the fact that with 3+2 you can have 3 people across the width of the train before you have to sit next to someone, whereas with 2+2 it's only two.
They're also the same seats (other than the design of the upper seat back) so unless you're bothered about armrests, if you sit in a non-window seat and nobody is next to you the experience for your backside between the two types is basically the same.
Because that's the concatenation of two local services that is highly likely. While the units seem to be in a common pool you do seem to get more 2+2 seated units on the Trent Valley semifasts than elsewhere, though it's not 100%.
That said, it's not all bad. LNR's long distance stuff, at least at weekends, carries a disproportionately large number of families and groups. For these, the bays of 6 (which are very well spaced indeed) are vastly preferable to the mostly airline layout of a /1, /3 or /4. You've also got the fact that with 3+2 you can have 3 people across the width of the train before you have to sit next to someone, whereas with 2+2 it's only two.
They're also the same seats (other than the design of the upper seat back) so unless you're bothered about armrests, if you sit in a non-window seat and nobody is next to you the experience for your backside between the two types is basically the same.
Weren't the 350/2 initially meant to be for suburban services only? Such as Wolverhampton - Walsall, London - Tring/MKC/Northampton. But then they decided to ditch it and have them in a common pool.
Weren't the 350/2 initially meant to be for suburban services only? Such as Wolverhampton - Walsall, London - Tring/MKC/Northampton. But then they decided to ditch it and have them in a common pool.
I think with the current timetable service interworks, so an unit could arrive from Tring then form the next Crewe.
In my experience most passengers if given the option between a 350/2 & other subclass on a pairing will aim for the other subclass. So that the 350/1 can be full and standing with the 350/2 empty
Certainly people tend to go for a non /2 if there are seats. I think your observation of it being full and standing may be due to other factors such as an unwillingness to walk to the front of a 12-car at Euston (or back on yourself at the bottom of the long platforms) or because the /2 was added at Northampton.