(Sorry if this is in the wrong subforum)
As the title says, have you been to the twin town(s) / sister city / cities of your home town (or of nearby settlements if your own isn't twinned with anywhere)? How do the public transport networks in them compare?
Hemel Hempstead isn't twinned with anywhere, but Dacorum as a whole is twinned with Neu-Isenburg. I'd say that Neu-Isenburg wins. There's a tram every fifteen minutes to Frankfurt (Main) Hbf, taking a quarter of an hour, and four S-Bahn services per hour between Frankfurt and Langen (two continuing to Darmstadt). Neither the tram stop nor the railway station are particularly central, but the same applies to Hemel Hempstead and Apsley stations (4 / 2 tph to Euston, 2 tph to Milton Keynes Central).
For Watford and Mainz, I think Mainz wins overall. Four Overground trains, four Tube trains and five LNR services to London per hour is better than what Mainz gets to Frankfurt (looking at 11:00–11:59 tomorrow, five direct trains taking 30-40 minutes), but connections between Mainz and Wiesbaden are better than between Watford and anywhere except central London and Harrow. (I suspect that part of the difference on the first point might be that Mainz has double Watford's population as well as being a state capital, so I'd guess has more inbound commuting.) Mainz also has a sizable tramway network and much further (but less regular) intercity services; a train every two hours to Berlin, as well as the Berlin – Brussels Nightjet, bihourly services to Basel and deeper into Switzerland, and a daily Amsterdam service (although leaving at 03:48 and arriving at 09:58 and having a return journey of 19:44–01:40 may not be to everybody's taste). Watford's 1 tph Avanti to Birmingham (currently extending to at least Preston in the mornings, but that's mostly going at some point) and 1 LNR tph via Northampton, a few early morning / evening services to / from Manchester, Liverpool and Scotland, and the Lowlander isn't terrible, and apart from restoring direct Brighton services (not enough capacity through Croydon and Gatwick, I presume) and stops on the Highlander, there's not much which can really be done without HS2, but I'd still put Mainz's long-distance connections above Watford's apart from in frequency.
I haven't been to Nanterre, Pesaro (Italy), Veliky Novgorod (Russia, if that twinning still stands) or Wilmington (Delaware). From a quick search Wilmington's the thirteenth-busiest Amtrak station, with 1-2 tph to Philadelphia (~30 miles), with most of those carrying on to New York, and there's a roughly hourly service to DC a hundred miles away, plus services to Chicago, Charlotte, New Orleans, Savannah, Miami, and St. Albans (a much longer distance than the Abbey line). There's SEPTA's Wilmington / Newark line as well but that's only hourly with some two hour gaps.
(The bit below put in quotes to make it easier to skip.)
As the title says, have you been to the twin town(s) / sister city / cities of your home town (or of nearby settlements if your own isn't twinned with anywhere)? How do the public transport networks in them compare?
Hemel Hempstead isn't twinned with anywhere, but Dacorum as a whole is twinned with Neu-Isenburg. I'd say that Neu-Isenburg wins. There's a tram every fifteen minutes to Frankfurt (Main) Hbf, taking a quarter of an hour, and four S-Bahn services per hour between Frankfurt and Langen (two continuing to Darmstadt). Neither the tram stop nor the railway station are particularly central, but the same applies to Hemel Hempstead and Apsley stations (4 / 2 tph to Euston, 2 tph to Milton Keynes Central).
For Watford and Mainz, I think Mainz wins overall. Four Overground trains, four Tube trains and five LNR services to London per hour is better than what Mainz gets to Frankfurt (looking at 11:00–11:59 tomorrow, five direct trains taking 30-40 minutes), but connections between Mainz and Wiesbaden are better than between Watford and anywhere except central London and Harrow. (I suspect that part of the difference on the first point might be that Mainz has double Watford's population as well as being a state capital, so I'd guess has more inbound commuting.) Mainz also has a sizable tramway network and much further (but less regular) intercity services; a train every two hours to Berlin, as well as the Berlin – Brussels Nightjet, bihourly services to Basel and deeper into Switzerland, and a daily Amsterdam service (although leaving at 03:48 and arriving at 09:58 and having a return journey of 19:44–01:40 may not be to everybody's taste). Watford's 1 tph Avanti to Birmingham (currently extending to at least Preston in the mornings, but that's mostly going at some point) and 1 LNR tph via Northampton, a few early morning / evening services to / from Manchester, Liverpool and Scotland, and the Lowlander isn't terrible, and apart from restoring direct Brighton services (not enough capacity through Croydon and Gatwick, I presume) and stops on the Highlander, there's not much which can really be done without HS2, but I'd still put Mainz's long-distance connections above Watford's apart from in frequency.
I haven't been to Nanterre, Pesaro (Italy), Veliky Novgorod (Russia, if that twinning still stands) or Wilmington (Delaware). From a quick search Wilmington's the thirteenth-busiest Amtrak station, with 1-2 tph to Philadelphia (~30 miles), with most of those carrying on to New York, and there's a roughly hourly service to DC a hundred miles away, plus services to Chicago, Charlotte, New Orleans, Savannah, Miami, and St. Albans (a much longer distance than the Abbey line). There's SEPTA's Wilmington / Newark line as well but that's only hourly with some two hour gaps.
(The bit below put in quotes to make it easier to skip.)
I haven't been to any of Newcastle's sister cities either; from a brief look, without being massively sure, I'd say that
- Atlanta has worse suburban rail / metro coverage (considering how large the built-up area is) and considerably less long-distance variety (one train per day between New York and New Orleans)
- Bergen's tram has a better frequency than the Tyne and Wear Metro but covers less of the city, and – although it's a longer distance with relatively few people in-between – four trains per day to Oslo is a lot worse than hourly or better services from Newcastle to Plymouth (a longer air distance than Bergen to Oslo), London, Liverpool and Edinburgh.
- Gelsenkirchen has a metro line and some tram lines (shared with Bochum) so I think it's around even. Bochum has a decent number of direct trains to Munich (but not frequently), Basel (every two hours), Hamburg (roughly every two hours) and very good services to Berlin (looking at a date a few weeks in the future due to engineering works, there's departures to Berlin at 08:33, 08:58, 09:15 and 09:33, for example) but Gelsenkirchen seems to have a lot fewer, so I'd say that Newcastle has the better intercity services.
- Groningen's limited to hourly services to Rotterdam and The Hague and local services to Zwolle, with no tram or metro, so Newcastle's is better.
- Haifa's underground funicular isn't massive, although trains to / from Tel Aviv seem to be fairly frequent (in normal times, at least).
- Little Rock wins for distance (the Texas Eagle to Chicago and Los Angeles) but not for frequency (daily as far as San Antonio) or local connections (no suburban rail, metro or tram).
- Nancy is the largest urban area in France apart from Douai - Lens with no metro or tram system (because the former guided bus is being converted to a trolleybus system) and the long-distance services mostly seem limited to one every hour or two to Paris (with some TGVs supplementing TERs towards Strasbourg).
- Newcastle, NSW has a rather short light rail (six stations) and two trains per hour to Sydney, but not brilliant connections to anywhere else as far as I can tell.
- Taiyuan has one metro line open (Line 2) with the plan to have seven lines by 2030; I don't know how good long-distance services are.