• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

London Buses Discussion

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,073
They do look rather odd, and it somewhat goes against the convention of bus windows covering any sections where you could see below someone’s waist with that black paint.
To look "below someone's waist" you have to lie on the pavement or road, with immediate arrest almost certainly to follow.

What about all those Borismasters with glazed staircases?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
9,599
To look "below someone's waist" you have to lie on the pavement or road, with immediate arrest almost certainly to follow.

What about all those Borismasters with glazed staircases?
Ok, technically my should’ve been more specific, but I was referring to seated areas on buses. There is no one (or there shouldn’t be anyone) sat on any buses glazed staircase. I’m simply referring to the tradition of any windows that would ‘show’ below someone’s mid section having the black enamel.

Btw to be clear, I’m not complaining about it or saying it’s even a bad design on the ieTrams, it has just always been something that stood out to about them, since most other buses effectively are the opposite.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,073
Ok, technically my should’ve been more specific, but I was referring to seated areas on buses. There is no one (or there shouldn’t be anyone) sat on any buses glazed staircase. I’m simply referring to the tradition of any windows that would ‘show’ below someone’s mid section having the black enamel.

Btw to be clear, I’m not complaining about it or saying it’s even a bad design on the ieTrams, it has just always been something that stood out to about them, since most other buses effectively are the opposite.
Ok, no worries!

Yes, it's an unusual feature and optional on the ieTram anyway. The Kent Fastrack ones are also going to feature the lower windows.

If you're going to go for such a radical looking vehicle you may as go radical to the fullest extent available.
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,133
Does it allow children in pushchairs to see out, which might make them quieter? Or indeed, maybe people in wheelchairs?
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,073
Does it allow children in pushchairs to see out, which might make them quieter? Or indeed, maybe people in wheelchairs?
I am told where they are deployed abroad children love them - and as you say probably keep them occupied!

The lower windows also let an incredible amount of natural light into the interior.
 

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,359
It is just a name, in the same way a Dennis Dragon is not literally a dragon.
True, but nobody would think that a bus is actually a mythical fire-breathing beast, whereas both buses and trams are forms of road transport, with the crucial difference being that the latter runs on rails. Calling a bus a 'tram' is confusing when the said vehicle does not run on rails.
 

H&I

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2023
Messages
210
Location
United Kingdom
True, but nobody would think that a bus is actually a mythical fire-breathing beast, whereas both buses and trams are forms of road transport, with the crucial difference being that the latter runs on rails. Calling a bus a 'tram' is confusing when the said vehicle does not run on rails.
The average passenger is not going to even know that the bus is called the ieTram. They will know it as the 358 bus to Orpington.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,073
True, but nobody would think that a bus is actually a mythical fire-breathing beast, whereas both buses and trams are forms of road transport, with the crucial difference being that the latter runs on rails. Calling a bus a 'tram' is confusing when the said vehicle does not run on rails.
It's the manufacturer's name for it. Passengers won't care less that it's called Irizar ieTram rather than Irizar ieBus. And they certainly won't get confused into thinking that the 358 is suddenly a tram route.
 

GodAtum

On Moderation
Joined
11 Dec 2009
Messages
2,637
What do people think of this news clip from the BBC?

It's incorrect as the 64 will stop when the lower deck is full and play the announcement "There are seats on the upper deck" until people move up.

The 433 is another great example of a bus that's too small for the route. It often gets full after the first few stops and then is an "express" bus to East Croydon!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

GusB

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,612
Location
Elginshire
It's incorrect as the 64 will stop when the lower deck is full and play the announcement "There are seats on the upper deck" until people move up.
The news item is talking about the number 18 and how it often doesn't stop because the lower deck is full, even if there are seats upstairs.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
12,651
Location
Yorkshire
What do people think of this news clip from the BBC?

It's incorrect as the 64 will stop when the lower deck is full and play the announcement "There are seats on the upper deck" until people move up.
The bus will only do that if the driver stops and plays the announcement.

And if the driver knows to do that, they're unlikely to think the bus is full, just because the lower deck is (or, as per the clip, that they don't have time to stop).
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,073
The bus will only do that if the driver stops and plays the announcement.

And if the driver knows to do that, they're unlikely to think the bus is full, just because the lower deck is (or, as per the clip, that they don't have time to stop).
And I've seen it loads of times - short-riding passengers just won't go upstairs. They prefer standing. It's the same as trying to get standing passengers to move to the back of single decks.

In such instances what is a driver to do? As I understand it there are a lot of short riders on the 18 and given how frequent the service is if drivers don't move the bus until people go upstairs it's quickly going to result in gaps and bunching (I think this is more credible than simply "there's not enough running time").

Perhaps the bad publicity will help. Time will tell.

Of course, the 18 is a perfect route for bendy-buses. How about a nice fleet of eCitaros? :D

.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,096
Of course, the 18 is a perfect route for bendy-buses. How about a nice fleet of eCitaros? :D

.
Back in trolleybus days, the 662 and 664 ran up Harrow Road from their terminus at Paddington Green, now basically the site of Britain's most secure police station and the not so frequent 18 or 18B buses were for passengers going further East along the Marylebone and Euston Roads to Baker Street, Kings Cross and beyond. In post-trolleybus days, a limited peak 18A ran to Paddington Green, but most 18/Bs terminated at Baker Street Station, two thirds of the service offpeak and three quarters at peak for many years. From personal experience working from a ground floor office on Euston Road 18s were few and far between, whereas now they all go to Euston. Time perhaps to get a few short-turners if a suitable turning point is available? Oh, sorry, that's not allowed because passengers are too thick to understand! :rolleyes:
 

FOH

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2013
Messages
712
Increasingly buses turning short have the short display on the outside but inside it has the whole route, and so does Google Maps. I'm wondering is it a Centre on instruction to do that? It's really really annoying
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,073
Increasingly buses turning short have the short display on the outside but inside it has the whole route, and so does Google Maps. I'm wondering is it a Centre on instruction to do that? It's really really annoying
I think it's an iBus problem. If the controller can't set up the curtailment remotely then the driver should be able to on the MDT. Sometimes it doesn't work. I have no idea why, but maybe because the system is getting old and worn out.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,096
Yes, they could not be more different.

In my driving days it was often 1st half Metrobus, 2nd half DMS, or 1st half Leyland National, 2nd half Metrobus, or combinations thereof. All very different!
Were you based at an old Tilling's shed south of Croydon, a 1950s post-tram construction north of that town or a garage near Kingston (long closed)? I don't remember Nationals at Sutton, but I could well be wrong; indeed, it might be none of the above. :smile:
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
6,252
Location
West Wiltshire

H&I

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2023
Messages
210
Location
United Kingdom
Found a photo of one of the buses for Superloop SL5 now wrapped (not my photo)


Personally not a fan of windows being blocked by logos, and seems to be rather an untidy mix of info in different sizes to me.
It seems a bit odd to me that they chose such an older Enviro200 rather than a newer bus for a Superloop route.


[New post below]
———————-

Is anyone going to be on the first SL5 bus this Saturday? First departures are at 05:15 in both directions.
 
Last edited:

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,854
It seems a bit odd to me that they chose such an older Enviro200 rather than a newer bus for a Superloop route.
Yes, a 12 year old E200 is rather an unimpressive vehicle for a headline route. I assume ENXs were chosen as the longest E200 they have?
 

MotCO

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
4,133
Yes, a 12 year old E200 is rather an unimpressive vehicle for a headline route. I assume ENXs were chosen as the longest E200 they have?

But the SL7s (X26) use 59 and 61 plate Wright/Volvos - 15 and 13 years old!
 

alex397

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2017
Messages
1,553
Location
UK
I seem to remember the ENX type being uncomfortable and rattly when I travelled on them nearly new. Now they are 12 years old! Not great for a high-profile route. Personally I think a high-spec single decker like a Citaro would be good for an express route. Or at least a newer Enviro200MMC which feel like they have better build quality than the original e200s
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,073
Found a photo of one of the buses for Superloop SL5 now wrapped (not my photo)


Personally not a fan of windows being blocked by logos, and seems to be rather an untidy mix of info in different sizes to me.
I've liked the livery on the various bus types up until now, but that roundel looks awful. It's going to completely block the view from at least one seat.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,096
I've liked the livery on the various bus types up until now, but that roundel looks awful. It's going to completely block the view from at least one seat.
Completely unacceptable. I travelled once on a Plymouth Citybus vehicle in an unfamiliar city and the journey was highly stressful because my view was obscured by its self-promotion over the outside of the windows. I never travelled on another service bus of theirs.
 

FOH

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2013
Messages
712
I think it's an iBus problem. If the controller can't set up the curtailment remotely then the driver should be able to on the MDT. Sometimes it doesn't work. I have no idea why, but maybe because the system is getting old and worn out.
Really interesting thanks, I didn't realise it wasn't a choice that was being made. Explains why when I moaned at the driver he looked at the panel and shrugged his shoulders
 

alex397

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2017
Messages
1,553
Location
UK
Of course, the 18 is a perfect route for bendy-buses. How about a nice fleet of eCitaros? :D
This is why I think it was very short sighted to make the political decision of completely getting rid of articulated buses in London. They would be far more suited to routes such as the 18 than double-deckers - routes that are generally straight with a lot of short journeys.
Being on a busy double-decker in London is quite stressful, with everyone having to funnel through the corridor in order to reach the stairs, or to get from the stairs to the exit doors.
Many people don’t want to go upstairs because of mobility issues, carrying bags, or just the hassle of it. That is not an issue on a bendybus.
I know the topic was originally about buses on the 18 not stopping because of timing issues rather than capacity, but I’d also say timing issues would reduce with bendybuses. A concern is fare evasion, but TEC buses in southern Belgium make everyone board at the front, but then there are three doors to exit and no new passengers have to wait for people to get down stairs.
 

Top