• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Avanti Class 221s to Cross Country

Status
Not open for further replies.

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
2,294
Location
East Midlands
I did have a rule that at busy times I'd only travel XC if it was allocated a double unit on the day, but I've revised that to "avoid regardless" since the chances of the second unit being locked out have increased significantly.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

class 9

Member
Joined
18 Nov 2010
Messages
1,011
Worth pointing out that Virgin wanted to order additional voyager carriages when it became obvious 4 and 5 carriages weren't enough for the XC network but they were over ruled by the oh so wonderful SRA that some of you may remember made other 'smart' decisions... like cutting the number of class 185s ordered
I think the crux of the problem back then was who pays, Virgin wanted government to finance them, Government wanted Virgin to pay, hence the stalemate.
 

E B

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2024
Messages
59
Location
nuneaton
Hopefully an increase in train lengths won't require any more drivers? Though crew shortages might be an issue if more are needed to double up units
I got on a 9 car voyager from Birmingham New Street to York. Midway through the journey, they told us all that the train would ‘split’ at Leeds and any passengers going further (all the way to edinburgh) had to leave the comfort of an ex-avanti voyager to get crammed (to the point where people were getting left behind) in the vestibule of a 4 car 220. When i got off at York, the rear unit was still attached! Probably due to these staff shortages.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It is for everyone - including the staff who now need to lock out sets and work overcrowded half trains.

I was on a unit recently that needed the rear unit locked out of use and it took half an hour to get everyone and their luggage off and onto the front unit.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Possibly due to the much lower number of seats? The Avanti units not only have a shop but also have the coach with the all-table seat layout.

Not to mention the amount of space the toilets take up...

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Looking at tomorrow's allocations, the final Aberdeen - Penzance has an additional 4 coaches from Newcastle to Bristol.
I rode 221114 from Birmingham to Leeds last weekend
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5876.jpeg
    IMG_5876.jpeg
    3.3 MB · Views: 131
Last edited:

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,870
they told us all that the train would ‘split’ at Leeds
I don't blame them. People will move much faster and are less likely to argue or even refuse to leave the set if they think those carriages aren't going any further
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,836
XC was atrocious yesterday. I really hope now alot of the extra 221s are coming into service this will change things for the better.

Lack of crew so the XC train I was on got turned around early with no warning then the following XC train one was 4 car so was rammed. Absolute nightmare, i hope this is not going to become a regular occurrence and XC get their act together soon.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,870
Lying to customers is never a great look.
When the end result is the same (nobody in that unit) and there is a recorded history of abuse and assaults in that sort of situation - I'd be pointing my fingers at the management who created this situation rather than traincrew who don't want to be abused or punched in the face, and keep things moving.

Personally I'd just say the rear unit will terminate rather than split, but I'd rather tell a white lie and keep the train moving as close to on time as possible, rather than give a detailed explanation to everyone about why the train is remaining full length but half of it can't be used, while increasing the risk of the train being cancelled if someone kicks off.

135.png
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
2,484
Location
Whittington
Lying to customers is never a great look.

It's not, but in reality how many normal passengers, non enthusiasts are going to notice that the rear 4 coaches are still there? Most get off and walk straight towards the exit without looking back, especially if it's busy.
 

99009

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2025
Messages
11
Location
Chesterfield
221111 is now entering service with XC today. It's currently allocated 1H14 Birmingham NS - Man Picc.

This means all 12 221's ex Avanti (221107-221118) have now entered service with XC.

The 221 fleet now and for the foreseeable future is allocated as follows...

221101 - 221106 - Spare + Unknown Future (Possible Open Access)
221107 - 221141 - XC
221142 + 221143 - Grand Central (Then Spare + Unknown Future + Possible Open Access)
221144 - XC

Also @voyagerdude220 no, I don't believe 221107 has been in service since.
 

Class172

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
3,845
Location
West Country
221111 is now entering service with XC today. It's currently allocated 1H14 Birmingham NS - Man Picc.
It was pulled from service at New St on the following southbound journey, I understand due to onboard computer issues.
 

voyagerdude220

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2005
Messages
3,550
It was pulled from service at New St on the following southbound journey, I understand due to onboard computer issues.
Also 221110 failed at Darlington this afternoon whilst working 14:35 Newcastle to Reading. Two engines out (both driving cars). I believe it had engine issues last Saturday whilst working 13:08 Edinburgh to Plymouth, but it was able to complete it's journey on Saturday.
 

Wyrleybart

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2020
Messages
1,995
Location
South Staffordshire
Also 221110 failed at Darlington this afternoon whilst working 14:35 Newcastle to Reading. Two engines out (both driving cars). I believe it had engine issues last Saturday whilst working 13:08 Edinburgh to Plymouth, but it was able to complete it's journey on Saturday.
Parked at Darlington overnight and dare say engineers will attend Wedneday morning
 

voyagerdude220

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2005
Messages
3,550
Parked at Darlington overnight and dare say engineers will attend Wedneday morning
Thanks, I was wondering what had happened to it. I'm guessing it's not possible for it to simply be coupled to a healthy Voyager and take it to Central Rivers for attention.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
9,161
Location
West Riding
221111 is now entering service with XC today. It's currently allocated 1H14 Birmingham NS - Man Picc.

This means all 12 221's ex Avanti (221107-221118) have now entered service with XC.

The 221 fleet now and for the foreseeable future is allocated as follows...

221101 - 221106 - Spare + Unknown Future (Possible Open Access)
221107 - 221141 - XC
221142 + 221143 - Grand Central (Then Spare + Unknown Future + Possible Open Access)
221144 - XC

Also @voyagerdude220 no, I don't believe 221107 has been in service since.
It’s a shame that the remaining spare sets can’t be utilised while the Open Access operation comes to fruition. Even trains sat still have to be maintained and storage paid for, so may as well use them to make revenue.

And do we know which OA operator these sets are likely to end up with?
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,870
It’s a shame that the remaining spare sets can’t be utilised while the Open Access operation comes to fruition. Even trains sat still have to be maintained and storage paid for, so may as well use them to make revenue.

And do we know which OA operator these sets are likely to end up with?
If XC wanted to pay, something would be worked out.

It would make absolute sense for their new operator or the ROSCO to give short term lease on them.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
32,987
If XC wanted to pay, something would be worked out.

It would make absolute sense for their new operator or the ROSCO to give short term lease on them.
XC themselves cannot make such a decision. DfT are 100% responsible for decisions about the XC fleet size.
 

AlanL

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2019
Messages
56
Location
Wolverhampton
It’s a shame that the remaining spare sets can’t be utilised while the Open Access operation comes to fruition. Even trains sat still have to be maintained and storage paid for, so may as well use them to make revenue.

And do we know which OA operator these sets are likely to end up with?
The Wrexham Shropshire and Midlands Railway are 'hopeful' of getting the go-ahead soon for their open access plans and Alstom are very involved in the plans and will be looking to be using the 6 remaining stored 221s for their services from Wrexham to Euston. However, nothing is yet confirmed!
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,698
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
The Wrexham Shropshire and Midlands Railway are 'hopeful' of getting the go-ahead soon for their open access plans and Alstom are very involved in the plans and will be looking to be using the 6 remaining stored 221s for their services from Wrexham to Euston. However, nothing is yet confirmed!
I personally think the idea of six much needed Voyagers not going to CrossCountry purely so so they can be used on a niche direct London service to Mid Wales and Shropshire of all places (take three), is actually really annoying.

In a similar way, Grand Central having two Voyagers that would be very useful at CrossCountry when four more of the very Adelantes that make up their main fleet are languishing at Ely is very annoying.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
9,161
Location
West Riding
I personally think the idea of six much needed Voyagers not going to CrossCountry purely so so they can be used on a niche direct London service to Mid Wales and Shropshire of all places (take three), is actually really annoying.

In a similar way, Grand Central having two Voyagers that would be very useful at CrossCountry when four more of the very Adelantes that make up their main fleet are languishing at Ely is very annoying.
Agreed on both counts.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,870
I personally think the idea of six much needed Voyagers not going to CrossCountry purely so so they can be used on a niche direct London service to Mid Wales and Shropshire of all places (take three), is actually really annoying.

In a similar way, Grand Central having two Voyagers that would be very useful at CrossCountry when four more of the very Adelantes that make up their main fleet are languishing at Ely is very annoying.
But that isn't the reason those units are elsewhere.

The two GC units were out of traffic for a long time before GC took them - they could have gone to XC then.

In the same way that I'm sure the ROSCO would have preferred for all the remaining Voyagers to go to one operator to avoid a situation where some do and another operator takes some of the rest but not all - leaving unwanted units sitting in sidings.

If the people controlling XC wanted those units, they could have had them. I don't understand why so many people don't understand this.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I presume 107 is not in traffic due to it's 'fire' at Stafford on it's first day in traffic with XC.
This 221 identifies as a 180 :lol:

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

four more of the very Adelantes that make up their main fleet are languishing at Ely
XC can take them if they are so desperate .
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top