• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Blackpool to London Valid Routes

rocrat

Member
Joined
19 Apr 2024
Messages
100
Location
Thetford
Ticket held: off-peak return London Terminals (LON) to Blackpool North (BPN)

Using the return portion BPN-LON, restriction code 9I (and therefore also 2V, YG/GO), after 1130 on a Friday (with journey into London on the Saturday).

Route (maps RP + RG):
Blackpool North to Preston (Northern)
Preston to Crewe (AWC)
Crewe to Wilmslow (AWC)
Wilmslow to Manchester Airport (Northern)
Manchester Airport to Manchester Piccadilly (TPE)
Manchester Piccadilly to Birmingham New Street (XC, 'not via Wilmslow')
Birmingham Moor Street to Banbury (Chiltern)
Banbury to Oxford (GWR)
(overnight break of journey)
Oxford to London (XC/GWR via Reading)

Is this a valid route? I had a rather large amount of time to kill and drew this out to be longer as I'd done most of the other mapped routes before! Thanks in advance :)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
14,888
One for the forum's routeing experts, but travelling 'wrong way' on the section from Crewe to Manchester Piccadilly (via Wilmslow and then Manchester Airport) seems like a circuitous route if you're actually heading back to London.
 

rocrat

Member
Joined
19 Apr 2024
Messages
100
Location
Thetford
One for the forum's routeing experts, but travelling 'wrong way' on the section from Crewe to Manchester Piccadilly (via Wilmslow and then Manchester Airport) seems like a circuitous route if you're actually heading back to London.
Definitely agree that it *appears* circuitous, but I don't *think* it involves any doubling back (excluding reversals). Happy to be corrected, but intrigued as to technical validity, particularly for the CRE-MAN leg!
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
14,172
Location
UK
Definitely agree that it *appears* circuitous, but I don't *think* it involves any doubling back (excluding reversals). Happy to be corrected, but intrigued as to technical validity, particularly for the CRE-MAN leg!
It's perfectly valid. You're tracing a mapped route that doesn't involve passing through any station more than once.
 

Top