LucaZone
Member
Any ideas what the train on the left is? Not see that before.

Just looked at the wikipedia entry for those- 250km/h, 16 carriage SLEEPER trains?
At that speed, you could easily wake up 1000 miles from where you went to bed. Nice.
Any ideas what the train on the left is? Not see that before.
![]()
CRH6 - NDJ3 - "GREATWALL"
Beijing - Yanqing (Open at 2008 ), Shijiazhuang - Qinhuangdao (open at 2009).
There's no "CRH6". It's just "NDJ3", or "Harmony Great Wall"
although it is not a CRH Series Train, It's still named under CRH
Chinese HSR
IHR- Intercity High-Speed Rail
PDL- Passenger Designated Line
PFL- Mixed passenger & freight HSR line
Line Section Length Designed Fastest Average
Speed Operating Speed
Wuguang PDL Wuhan-Guagnzhou 968 km 350km/h 296.33km/h
Huning HSR Shanghai-Nanjing 296 km 350km/h 243.29km/h
Jingjin IHR Beijing-Tianjin 120 km 350km/h 240km/h
Zhengxi PDL Zhengzhou-Xi'an 455 km 350km/h 231.36km/h
Wenfu PFL Wenzhou-Fuzhou 298.4 km 250km/h 208.19km/h
Yongtaiwen PFL Ningbo-Wenzhou 268 km 250km/h 206.15km/h
****ai PDL Shijiazhuang-Taiyuan 225 km 250km/h 204.55km/h
Fuxia PFL Fuzhou-Xiamen 274.9 km 250km/h 198.72km/h
Qinshen PDL Qinhuangdao-Shenyang 405 km 250km/h 197.56km/h
Hening PFL Hefei-Nanjing 156 km 250km/h 173.33km/h
Hewu PFL Hankou-Hefei 351 km 250km/h 172.62km/h
Jiaoji PDL Qingdao-Jinan 362.5 km 250km/h 161.11km/h
Dacheng PFL Suining-Chengdu 148 km 200km/h 153.1km/h
(Suining-Chengdu Route)
Chengguan IHR Chengdu-Qingchengshan 67 km 200km/h 134km/h
Chinese upgrade conventional railways
Line Route Length Designed Fastest Average
Speed Operating Speed
Jingguang line Beijing-Hankou 1205 km 200km/h 134.39km/h
(Beijing-Hankou Route)
Jingguang line Wuchang-Changsha 362 km 200km/h 114.92km/h
(Wuchang-Changsha Route)
Jingha line Beijing-Harbin 1249 km 200km/h 157.77km/h
Jingha line Tianjin-Qinhuangdao 285 km 200km/h 123.91km/h
(Tianjin-Qinhuangdao Route)
Jinghu line Beijing-Shanghai 1463 km 200km/h 142.27km/h
Hukun line Shanghai-Changsha 1177 km 200km/h 147.43km/h
(Shanghai-Liling Route,Liling-Changsha Runs at Jinghu Line)
Longhai line Shanghai-Zhengzhou 998 km 200km/h 148.22km/h
(Pixian-Zhengzhou Route, Shanghai-Pixian Runs at Jinghu line)
Longhai line Baoji-Xi'an 173 km 200km/h 133.08km/h
(Baoji-Xi'an Route)
Guangshan line Guangzhou-Shenzhen 139 km 200km/h 160.38km/h
line Section length time Average speed
Changjiu ICH Nanchang-Jiujiang 131.27km 40m 197.55 km/h
Wujiu line Wuchang-Jiujiang 215.93km 1h20m 161.95 km/h
Wujiu line & Changjiu ICH Wuchang-Nanchang 347.2km 2h 173.6 km/h
line Section length time Average speed
Changjiu ICH Nanchang-Jiujiang 131.27km 40m 197.55 km/h
Wujiu PDL Wuchang-Jiujiang 198km 50m 237.60 km/h
Wujiu PDL & Changjiu ICH Wuchang-Nanchang 329.27km 1h30m 219.51 km/h
Bullet for minister who bungled China's high-speed railway surge
19 February 2011
By MICHAEL WINES
In HIS seven years as chief of the Chinese railways ministry, Liu Zhijun built a commercial and political colossus that spanned continents and elevated the lowly train to a national symbol of pride and technological prowess. His abrupt sacking by the Communist Party last weekend has cast that empire in a decidedly different light, raising doubts not only about Mr Liu's stewardship and the corruption that dogs China's vast public-works projects, but also, perhaps, the safety, financial soundness and long-term viability of a rail system that has captured the world's attention.
Mr Liu, 58, was fired last Saturday and is being investigated by the party's disciplinary committee for "severe violations of discipline," a euphemism for corruption. His high government rank - minister-level officials are rarely fired under such a cloud - hints at deeper dissatisfaction.
Until last week, Mr Liu had led China's project to lace the nation with nearly 8,100 miles of high-speed rail lines and to build more than 11,000 miles of traditional track. The sheer size and cost of the endeavour is staggering - the investment has been estimated at $750 billion.
There are some clues to his sacking in top officials' public statements since the scandal broke. Speaking on Monday in Beijing, the official who is believed to be the country's new railways chief, Sheng Guangzu, said the ministry would "place quality and safety at the centre of construction projects."
The statement underscored concerns in some quarters that Mr Liu cut corners in his push to extend the rail system and to keep the project on schedule and within budget.
A person with ties to the ministry said the concrete bases for the tracks were so cheaply made, with inadequate use of chemical hardening agents, that trains would be unable to maintain their current speeds of about 217mph for more than a few years. In as little as five years, lower speeds, possibly below about 186mph, could be required as the rails become less straight, the expert said.
Strong concrete pillars require a large dose of high-quality fly ash, the by-product of burning coal. But the speed of construction has far exceeded supply, according to a 2008 study.
Such problems, the expert said, are caused by a combination of tight controls that have kept China's costs far below western levels and a strong aversion to buying higher-quality but costlier equipment from abroad.
China's high-speed network has been built far more cheaply than similar projects in the West and in Japan. A mile of rail in China costs roughly $15 million; in the West, estimates peg the price at anywhere between $40 million to $80 million.
The timing of Mr Liu's firing may be significant. It came at the end of China's Lunar New Year holiday, when trains are jammed and passengers are angriest.
The Communist Party has long worried that corruption may undermine its credibility with the public. But high-level officials are seldom sacked for corruption alone.
Russell Leigh Moses, an expert on the Chinese leadership, said Mr Liu's dismissal could signal disquiet over whether expansion had gone too far, too fast.
"You don't take someone down at that level of status unless they've done something really egregious," said Mr Moses. "I don't know whether it's politics or policy. But I wouldn't rule out the second."
http://news.scotsman.com/topstories/Bullet-for-minister-who-bungled.6720808.jp?articlepage=1
China responds to high-speed rail safety fears
By Jamil Anderlini in Sanya, China
Published: April 14 2011 13:23 | Last updated: April 14 2011 13:23
China is lowering the operating speeds on its new bullet train lines because of safety and affordability concerns over the biggest high-speed rail network in the world.
The top speed for trains running on the country’s main high-speed lines will be reduced from 350km/h to 300km/h, said Sheng Guangzu, China’s new railway minister.
“This will offer more safety,” Mr Sheng was quoted as saying in the official Communist party mouthpiece, People’s Daily. “At the same time, this will allow more variation in ticket prices based on market principles.”
Lowering the speed limit for China’s showcase high-speed rail network signals a serious rethink of the country’s hugely ambitious plans. The move follows the removal of Liu Zhijun, the former railway minister, in February.
The Communist party is investigating Mr Liu for “serious disciplinary violations”, a claim that usually results in criminal corruption charges. Chinese media have aired allegations against him ranging from taking bribes to improper sexual liaisons.
Mr Liu and Zhang Shuguang, the former deputy chief engineer at the railway ministry who was also removed from his post on the same charges, were the main cheerleaders for China’s efforts to build ever-faster trains based on technology acquired from German, French and Japanese companies.
In addition to the new speed limit, which is expected to lower energy usage and operating costs, the total railway construction budget for the next five years appears to have been scaled back.
Mr Sheng said the government would spend Rmb2,800bn ($428.8bn) on railway construction from now until 2015, significantly less than previous reported estimates.
Although China’s railway network will still be expanded from the current 91,000km to 120,000km by the end of 2015 as previously planned, analysts said it was likely some planned high-speed routes would be cut and replaced with ordinary lines.
“The plans to run the trains at such high speeds posed a big safety risk,” said Zhao Jian, a professor at Beijing Transportation University.
Mr Zhao said lowering the operating speeds would also help pay for the extremely expensive new network by reducing ticket prices and increasing passenger numbers.
Critics of China’s high-speed rail project say the trains produced by Chinese companies are heavily based on foreign designs that were only meant to travel up to 250km/h.
China’s railway ministry and state-owned rail companies have consistently claimed to have “digested” and “re-innovated” these foreign designs to create completely homegrown Chinese trains. But most analysts and industry participants say more than 90 per cent of the technology is directly copied or bought from foreign companies.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, international rail executives have told the Financial Times that modifying the original designs to make trains go 350km/h and faster posed a serious safety risk.
China’s centrepiece Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail line, which is scheduled to open in the second half of this year, will have its top speed reduced from the planned 380km/h to the same national limit of 300km/h as the other main lines, Mr Sheng said in comments published in Chinese state media.
Meanwhile, regional non-trunk high-speed lines will operate trains at between 200 and 250km/h, while most railways in central and western China will operate at less than 200 km/h.
The main 300km/h lines will also operate bullet trains at slower speeds that cost less to ride, in an attempt to increase the number of passengers on those routes.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4cd5723e-6685-11e0-ac4d-00144feab49a.html#ixzz1JVFN6cst
Of course the trains will be copies (rip offs) of other designs, and wasn't this line supposedly built with dodgy concrete and other materials?
No doubt we'll see people using this as another reason to attack HS2, saying it proves high speed rail is dangerous.
Nonetheless, the pace at which the Chinese high speed rail network is expanding is pretty extraordinary compared to the speed at which HS2 is going through the consultation process.