• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 91 loco on its own at Leeds Station

Status
Not open for further replies.

rich r

Member
Joined
2 Mar 2017
Messages
149
Last night whilst I was waiting for my 16:48 train home from Leeds, loco 91132 came zipping through the station on its own - ie no coaches, no DVT. Is this something they often do?

What might be the reason for it (other than 91132's had a hard enough history as it is)? The only thing I could think of was that something was wrong with the loco at the front of the Kings Cross train, and so this one was being relocated to the front to power it.

Just curious as I haven't seen that happen before.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
17,000
Last night whilst I was waiting for my 16:48 train home from Leeds, loco 91132 came zipping through the station on its own - ie no coaches, no DVT. Is this something they often do?

What might be the reason for it (other than 91132's had a hard enough history as it is)? The only thing I could think of was that something was wrong with the loco at the front of the Kings Cross train, and so this one was being relocated to the front to power it.

Just curious as I haven't seen that happen before.
It was working 0Z14 1602 Doncaster West Yard - Neville Hill depot. It had been at Wabtec Doncaster for repair/overhaul and was going light engine to Neville Hill for return to service.

With Doncaster doing overhaul work on the 91 fleet, locos are moved to/from either Bounds Green or Neville Hill, depending on operational needs.
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,508
Often what they try and do is allocate the next loco due for overhaul onto a diagram that finishes the day at Leeds and retires to Neville Hill depot for the night.

Then the loco fresh out of works runs light to Neville Hill (as you witnessed), swaps places with the other loco which then runs light to Doncaster Wabtec, usually the next morning.

Saves a light engine running all the way to/from Bounds Green, though this does happen as well when locos go for unscheduled repairs and are needed back ASAP.
 

Lockwood

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2013
Messages
1,153
How long does it take to blow the cobwebs off of the blunt end controls before doing that?
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,508
Probably not long, they'll get used regularly enough shunting on and off of sets at Bounds Green.
 

richardsun

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2011
Messages
31
Out of curiosity, are the blunt end controls and cab fairly similar to the 'business' end, or are they more basic and stripped down, bearing in mind they aren't likely to see as much use?
 

ash39

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2012
Messages
1,508
More or less the same - they are essentially a dual cab loco in the conventional sense, the only unconventional aspect is the shape is different at each end to improve aero efficiency.

Some of the early HST power cars did have a basic 'shunt-only' set of controls at the coridoor end. I'm not sure if they were removed/isolated in later life.

I also think I remember reading that 90's and 91's had similar shunt controls by the cab doors, but not 100% on that one.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,763
It was working 0Z14 1602 Doncaster West Yard - Neville Hill depot. It had been at Wabtec Doncaster for repair/overhaul and was going light engine to Neville Hill for return to service.

With Doncaster doing overhaul work on the 91 fleet, locos are moved to/from either Bounds Green or Neville Hill, depending on operational needs.
Out of curiosity, are the blunt end controls and cab fairly similar to the 'business' end, or are they more basic and stripped down, bearing in mind they aren't likely to see as much use?
Since you are discussing class 91 cabs and overhauls, I note that Roger Ford has some pictures of an ETCS Level 2 driver-machine interface screen in this month's Modern Railways which he writes were "taken while 'driving' the Virgin Trains East Coast Class 91 simulator." I didn't think the 91s had ETCS, so does the overhaul work at Doncaster include fitting them with it? And is that the programme for which Virgin are leasing class 90s as cover for 91s or is that work taking place elsewhere?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
17,000
Some of the early HST power cars did have a basic 'shunt-only' set of controls at the coridoor end. I'm not sure if they were removed/isolated in later life.
Only the prototype power cars had controls at the corridor end, and it is believed they were never used.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,407
Location
Devon
Only the prototype power cars had controls at the corridor end, and it is believed they were never used.
(Wildly off topic but not worth starting a new thread over.)
Does 41001 still have the second set of controls? And if so, do they still work?
 
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,010
More or less the same - they are essentially a dual cab loco in the conventional sense, the only unconventional aspect is the shape is different at each end to improve aero efficiency.

Some of the early HST power cars did have a basic 'shunt-only' set of controls at the coridoor end. I'm not sure if they were removed/isolated in later life.

I also think I remember reading that 90's and 91's had similar shunt controls by the cab doors, but not 100% on that one.

IIRC the reason the 91 has a cab at the blunt end is that they were originally planned to be used on the sleepers and 'fast and light' goods such as parcels / mails / newspapers ... however the break up of BR and the utilisation of the Cl91 on ECML 'day ' workings put paid to that
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
17,000
(Wildly off topic but not worth starting a new thread over.)
Does 41001 still have the second set of controls? And if so, do they still work?
Yes and no. AIUI it seems likely that they were never commissioned for use.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,407
Location
Devon
Yes and no. AIUI it seems likely that they were never commissioned for use.
Ah thanks for that. I’ve only looked through the window once and that was at the NRM years ago.
 

GrahamD83

Member
Joined
5 Mar 2018
Messages
100
On the subject of 91's is there any news on the future of 91119? There was a topic on it a few months ago.
 

SteveyBee131

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
702
Location
Grimsby Town
...I also think I remember reading that 90's and 91's had similar shunt controls by the cab doors, but not 100% on that one.

They were indeed built with shunting controls. Think they had an early example of single power/brake control lever and other basic things like horn, AWS reset, master switch, but may stand corrected. Would be interesting to see pics. Also to know if they were ever used and if they still have them.
 

whhistle

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
To put the photo above into proper surroundings context, here's a photo of it in situ:
3765125_orig.jpg


While slightly off-topic, apparently this is an HST blunty cab:
16460182909_76e707054c.jpg


And Dawlish Trains has a good photo of the "slab end" 91:
8285610_orig.jpg


And the non-driving position:
3287320_orig.jpg
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
18,648
Location
Yorkshire
i don't think in all my years living and travelling on the East Coast I have ever seen a 91 run on it's own.
Nor have I. I have had haulage behind a blunt-end first 91 after it ran round at Peterborough due to a fault on the DVT. Also (IIRC) seen 89001 leaving Wakefield Westgate southbound, coupled nose-to-nose with the DVT.
 

rich r

Member
Joined
2 Mar 2017
Messages
149
Nor have I. I have had haulage behind a blunt-end first 91 after it ran round at Peterborough due to a fault on the DVT. Also (IIRC) seen 89001 leaving Wakefield Westgate southbound, coupled nose-to-nose with the DVT.

I feel lucky to have been waiting for a delayed TPE train the other day, looking across towards Platform 8 contemplating whether to get the Northern 158 instead when the 91 came through...
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,932
Just to add to the mix, yesterday evening an EMT HST powercar was heading through Leeds on its own, headed towards Neville Hill.
 

alexl92

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2014
Messages
2,314
IIRC the reason the 91 has a cab at the blunt end is that they were originally planned to be used on the sleepers and 'fast and light' goods such as parcels / mails / newspapers ... however the break up of BR and the utilisation of the Cl91 on ECML 'day ' workings put paid to that

My understanding is that the idea was they’d be used on the normal East Coast services during the day and Parcels/express freight overnight. When working on the MKIV sets they would only ever need the sharp end cab because they had a DVT at the other, and when working freight/parcels the 110mph restriction for blunt-end running wouldn’t be an issue either.

Never heard the sleeper thing before but then again, I’m not an authority on the subject so you’re probably right!
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,763
Since you are discussing class 91 cabs and overhauls, I note that Roger Ford has some pictures of an ETCS Level 2 driver-machine interface screen in this month's Modern Railways which he writes were "taken while 'driving' the Virgin Trains East Coast Class 91 simulator." I didn't think the 91s had ETCS, so does the overhaul work at Doncaster include fitting them with it? And is that the programme for which Virgin are leasing class 90s as cover for 91s or is that work taking place elsewhere?
Does nobody here know?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top