• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

DVT 82113 (19001) Future

Status
Not open for further replies.

dmkc

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2017
Messages
78
The always enjoyable YouTube videos from BONESS27001 shows comment that ex -DVT 82113 (19001) which had something of a power unit put into it has been 'abandoned' by its current owner LenzLabs @ Bo'ness


Seems a bit of a waste - Was surreal viewing seeing it travelling along under 'its own steam' as it were!

(Mods: there is an existing thread on this locked :))
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
4,051
Location
SW London
Such is the fate of most test beds. Once it has proved the concept (if indeed it did) it will have served its purpose, and a production version can be built with the equipment better integrated into a practical train, without all the experimenal apparatus.

The "class 614" unit is also seen early on in that video.
 

Strathclyder

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
3,459
Location
Clydebank
Probably binned unless B&KR wants it.
While not strictly accurate - as I'm not aware of them ever working with Mk3 DVTs in service - you could put it next to the 91 they have in the museum as a push-pull train exhibit? Of course as you say, if there was sufficent interest in it being kept at all. Chances are it'll end up getting binned off.
 

dmkc

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2017
Messages
78
Off to the big scrapyard in the sky going by recent pics etc etc
 

Royston Vasey

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,519
Location
Cambridge
Bit silly wasting a class number on it really. Although not a departmental loco as such (but in a privatised world, who is the "department" anyway) it would have been better given a subclass of Class 97, or better, left officially as a coaching stock vehicle until it needed to move under its own power on the mainline, if ever.

At least it can now be reused!
 
Last edited:

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,932
Bit silly wasting a class number on it really. Although not a departmental loco as such (but in a privatised world, who is the "department" anyway) it would have been better given a subclass of Class 97, or better, left officially as a coaching stock vehicle until it needed to move under its own power on the mainline, if ever.
There was no class number wasted on it. It has never been mainline registered as 19001.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
12,254
There was no class number wasted on it. It has never been mainline registered as 19001.
Indeed. I only learned recently that Class 19 was an ’honouary’ designation.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
16,334
Location
Epsom
Indeed. I only learned recently that Class 19 was an ’honouary’ designation.
Does that mean it was never formally registered on the Rolling Stock Library ( or whatever that's called these days ) and so they don't need to wait the normal seven years before re-using the number?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
16,932
Does that mean it was never formally registered on the Rolling Stock Library ( or whatever that's called these days ) and so they don't need to wait the normal seven years before re-using the number?
Correct. It is still 82113 on the system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top