• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Historically accurate TOCs

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
2,672
Location
Way on down South London town
I know TOCs are dead, but you know what I mean. If we were rearranging the current TOCs by historical patterns, what would change? Off the top of my head:

GWR loses some branches in the West Country to SWR

CAT/TAT goes to South Eastern

Leeds to Carlisle goes to EMR

North Downs goes from GWR to SouthEastern
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Zomboid

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
1,014
Location
Oxford
Going back to pre 1923?

I dread to think what would happen to Northern, it looks like a right old mishmash of former LNWR, L&Y, Midland, GNR, NER, MSLR and probably a bunch of others that I've forgotten and then confused by the various chords which have been added over the years so duplicate routes can be closed...

Might be less of a horror show if it went to the big 4, at least there's only two major players in the area then...
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
15,017
I know TOCs are dead, but you know what I mean. If we were rearranging the current TOCs by historical patterns, what would change? Off the top of my head:

Leeds to Carlisle goes to EMR
Erm, why? Would be a stand alone EMR service outside the rest of the EMR network.
 

The Mercian

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2024
Messages
27
Location
Henbury
With apologies to SadSprinter but why? It’s this type of thinking big 4, pre nationalisation, nationalised, privatised TOCs, route specific operators that holds UK Railways back along with the frankly perverse notion that it only matters if it’s going to London. The economic geography of the UK has changed massively in the last 50 years it’s about time the railways were organised to reflect that. I’d hope much more focus from GBR on city region and wider intra/inter region operations and a national Inter City and HS operation. I long for the day “TOCs” are removed and replaced with things that actually resemble the passengers and voters they serve.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
2,672
Location
Way on down South London town
With apologies to SadSprinter but why? It’s this type of thinking big 4, pre nationalisation, nationalised, privatised TOCs, route specific operators that holds UK Railways back along with the frankly perverse notion that it only matters if it’s going to London. The economic geography of the UK has changed massively in the last 50 years it’s about time the railways were organised to reflect that. I’d hope much more focus from GBR on city region and wider intra/inter region operations and a national Inter City and HS operation. I long for the day “TOCs” are removed and replaced with things that actually resemble the passengers and voters they serve.

Was just a thought experiment to see what the changes would be.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Erm, why? Would be a stand alone EMR service outside the rest of the EMR network.

well you could merge the Leeds to Nottingham service into EMR too
 

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
2,266
Parts of the East London line and the Crossrail core and Abbey Wood branch would stay with TfL, but most of London Overground wouldn't.
 

Top