I am always happy to answer questions if the answer lies within my somewhat esoteric areas of interest. What does annoy me is when the OP posts follow-up questions that show that they have not read the answers they have been given. (I do mean ‘not read’, not merely ’hasn’t understood’.) If you are going to ask a question which results in others spending time answering, often after spending time digging out the full answer, you could at least do us the courtesy of reading what we have written.
Yes, this reminds me of a Reddit post actually.
Some person donated money to Hezbollah. They did so on the basis of their humanitarian work, arguing that their military division was completely separate. Their bank account was frozen, because Hezbollah is a proscribed organisation.
Multiple people pointed out that their motive for donating was irrelevant, and believing their military wing to be separate was irrelevant. What was relevant was that they had sent money to a proscribed organisation, which, whether you agree with it or not, is a criminal offence and the banks will freeze your assets.
The author came back time after time to argue how they didn't donate to the military wing, or that they donated on some form of humanitarian basis; despite repeatedly being told that it doesn't matter, because Hezbollah is a proscribed organisation and giving money to prescribed organisations is an offence.
This was a r/LegalAdviceUK sub, and resulted in a moderator of the sub stepping in to tell the author to stop ignoring what people are saying. For those who don't frequent Reddit, r/LegalAdviceUK moderators actually commenting as moderatorsnto give legal advice themselves is rare.
It also resulted in one of the few things on Reddit which has made me genuinely laugh out loud:
Just because you’re all “Ooh Ahh, Hezbollah!” doesn’t mean they’re not terrorists!
Some people do go to forums, ask questions, and ignore the answers. It's very odd.
But to come back to the original question here, for some people, a definitive reference just won't help. There is a definitive list of proscribed organisations and a simple to read gov.uk web page which makes clear what the implications of that are. That person still chose to question it all.
But for 95%+ of the rational question-asking forum goers, a definitive reference would be useful. I enjoyed browsing the signs website just now.