Absolutely brilliant, thanks very much.An unfitted 12 Ton Wood-bodied High Open with steel underframe and 10’ wheelbase. It was built at Derby in 1936 to Diagram 1892, lot 918.
That's great, thank you.this appears to be a drawing of the design
![]()
Wagons: LMS D1892 Open Wagon Drawing
Doug Hewson Drawing showing LMS D1892 Open Wagon. This drawing features in Doug Hewson's Constructing Wagons Book:- Drawing number 2 Size of drawing is approx 129cm x 84cmsteamworkshopstores.com
Thanks for the information, I will check that book out.Can recommend a book 'The LMS wagon', by R.J. Essery and K.R. Morgan, David & Charles/1977 if you can find a copy. No actual photos of a Dia 1892/lot 918 wagon, but there is a photo of a one off very similar wagon, albeit a fitted version, to Dia 1892/lot 810, on page 35. Just for info there were 750 wagons built in the range of your w/plate (lot 918), 404000 - 404749.
That sounds like a lot of wagon plates to make that weight!A very long time ago as a junior railway civil engineer, I once loaded out a couple of tons of wagon number plates for scrap! I wish I had kept a few!
Correct. Two reasonable size piles at a location where they had been scrapping hundreds of wooden bodied wagons, but for some reason they left the number plates behind.That sounds like a lot of wagon plates to make that weight!
Thanks - interesting to wonder why - when presumably all the other metal components (wagon chassis etc) must have gone into the scrap furnaces. You wouldn't think they would even take the time to remove the number plates from whatever they were attached to.Correct. Two reasonable size piles at a location where they had been scrapping hundreds of wooden bodied wagons, but for some reason they left the number plates behind.
Maybe the wrought iron and/or steel attracted a better price at the time than the cast iron number plates? Or the company could re-use cast iron internally but not the other stuff?Thanks - interesting to wonder why - when presumably all the other metal components (wagon chassis etc) must have gone into the scrap furnaces. You wouldn't think they would even take the time to remove the number plates from whatever they were attached to.
Perhaps a decision only known to those on site at the time who made the decision!
Thanks, good point esp ref the price / value of the different sort of scrap.Maybe the wrought iron and/or steel attracted a better price at the time than the cast iron number plates? Or the company could re-use cast iron internally but not the other stuff?
Or maybe the numbers / plates might have been for use again on supposedly not-new wagons? Apparently quite a few steam locos were not technically scrapped, but a few components were built into otherwise-new locos because of some accounting rule (aka fiddle!)
Equally likely... Did the wagons have plates both sides? if so, count them and divide by 2? or keep 1 off each wagon? (or keep rather more and hope the auditors never made a detailed check of the numbers?)Could they have been kept back as some sort of proof of how many or which wagons were scrapped?