• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Maersk is moving from Felixstowe to London Gateway

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,032
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Shipping giant Maersk has announced it is moving its Felixstowe port traffic to London Gateway in February 2025.
I imagine that will have a major impact on the rail freight business, with more traffic using the North London Line and less travelling via Ely.
Maybe someone who understands the freight flows at each site will be able to comment on the significance of the change.
At first sight it seems to reduce the business case for upgrades of the route from Felixstowe via Ipswich, Ely. Peterborough and Leicester to Nuneaton.
London Gateway itself is getting a major expansion, though that will take 5 years or more to deliver.
A major container shipping company has announced it will no longer use the Port of Felixstowe from next year.
Maersk said its operations at the Suffolk-based port would cease from February following a review of its network.
The firm said it had concluded that the London Gateway port on the Thames estuary in Essex was "the most optimal port to serve our customers" in the UK.
It said it expected to share further details "over the next couple of weeks".
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Wavertreelad

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
731
Touched on this subject on this post.


To explain the musical chairs that is happening. Presently Maersk operates joint services with MSC on the main east/west trades under an agreement called 2M. This agreement is ending in February and Maersk will team up with Hapag Lloyd to operate the Gemini cooperation in the main /east trades. At the same time, Hapag are quitting their current Alliance agreement with ONE, Yang Ming and HMM in the same trades with these three lines forming a new agreement called Premier Alliance. MSC as the worlds largest shipping line will then operate it's own standalone services, but because Premier Alliance does not have sufficient capacity of it's own, they will take slots on some of MSC's Asia Europe services with MSC also taking slots on some Premier Alliance services in return.

Gemimi will operate what is known as a hub and spoke service, with Rotterdam and Bremerhaven being the two hub ports in North Europe and feeders operating to and from other ports, except in the UK where the original plan was to use Felixstowe for Asia Europe services, by far the largest volume, Southampton for Transatlantic services and London Gateway for Middle East and Indian Subcontinent services. Under existing agreements 2M used Felixstowe and London Gateway whilst the Alliance used Southampton and London Gateway for their joint services. For Hapag the proposed move to Felixstowe was massive because none of it's own services operated from the port so it was faced with the problem of securing road and rail transport capacity to and from an already congested port, after operating from Southampton for over thirty years. To make matters worse, it's main road haulier Maritime Transport Limited, announced on the lst September 2024 that it had been acquired by the Swiss logistics firm, Medlog, which is basically a subsidiary of MSC. Whilst Maritime stated the company would continue to be operated by the existing UK Management obviously Hapag would have been concerned that eventually MSC could learn the destinations of all containers hauled by Maritime Transport on their behalf. In the meantime, earlier in the year Hapag had acquired the London Gateway Port based road haulier ATL to service some of it's existing London Gateway and Southampton traffic. https://motortransport.co.uk/operat...rman-shipping-giant-hapag-lloyd/17864.article It looks like during their Gemini planning meetings Maersk and Hapag decided that the combined transport and port congestion problems at Felixstowe could have detrimental effects on service levels which would be critical to the success of the new Gemini cooperation which relies on mother and feeder ships remaining on schedule. In the meantime, DP World London Gateway started commissioning of a third berth and no doubt will have been very interested in securing a major customer such as the proposed Gemini services and no doubt would have priced any enquiries competitively, resulting in the change of plan by the Gemini lines.

So that's the history and basically it means Felixstowe will loose three vessel ports calls at week which usually would be capable of carrying up to 24000 teu each. Not all these containers would be discharged/loaded in Felixstowe, but it's reasonable to assume about 5000 teu (or 2500 forty foot containers) at least would be discharged and a similar number loaded although the majority of these will be empties. Maersk already operates from London Gateway but this is primarily to load export containers many of which will have entered the UK through Fellixstowe but when emptied are delivered back to London Gateway Port from where the haulier will pick up a laden container. Hapag and it's Alliance partners already operated out of London Gateway, but the new agreement will see a huge number of extra containers moving through London Gateway. The news that DP World now plan to build a fourth berth would suggest that ultimately Gemini will also shift it's Southampton operations for London Gateway port, possibly well before it is completed.

As far as Felixstowe is concerned, the loss of the three Maersk services will give the port the opportunity to adjust berthing windows for remaining shipping lines which should ease congestion and allow the port to look to capture other traffic, perhaps even some lost to London Gateway. I suspect the key here will be MSC who operates a number of services from London Gateway, some of which over the years have transferred from Felixstowe due to ongoing congestion. Post February 2025 MSC and Premier Alliance will operate a total of eight Asia Europe Services, three of which are planned to omit the UK entirely. Two services will probably be operated by Premier Alliance and will call Southampton, MSC will likely operate one service calling at London Gateway primarily to load exports for the Middle East before returning to Asia, plus a second service with a double call at Felixstowe. A third MSC service from Asia currently operates to Liverpool but was shown on the initial press release as switching to Felixstowe but the indications are so far that the service will remain at Liverpool, especially given the considerable investment that MSC has put into the Liverpool 2 terminal with it's joint venture with Peel Ports. Under the agreement with with Premier Alliance the later will not participate on the MSC services to Felixstowe and Liverpool and it's still possible that MSC could alter the port calls on individual services to match volumes and trade flows as they are still to announce the full details of all their post 2m schedules which included two Transatlantic services calling at London Gateway Port. However, this may have been to cater for Premier Alliance, but it looks from filings with the US authorities that they will operate independent services so MSC could decide to shift these and other services back to Felixstowe where they can take advantage of any additional rail and road capacity without having to compete with Maersk/Hapag.

The question should therefore perhaps be, how many trains per day to/from Felixstowe were exclusively operated for Maersk and how many of these operated via the North London line? I'm assuming the later could be truncated and diverted to London Gateway without too many problems, assuming the rollingstock pairing with depots was suitable. One would assume the Ely services are routed that way because the paths exist, raising the question of whether the paths from Ely, Peterborough, Leicester or Nuneaton to and from London Gateway Port are available or has Gemini just scored a big home goal?
 

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
808
Maersk are not pulling out completely. They will still operate to and from Felixstowe for services outside the Gemini agreement.
"A spokesperson for Maersk said: "We are not totally leaving the port, this is only for the future Gemini network which we will operate in cooperation with Hapag-Lloyd as from February 2025, and which will replace our existing 2M alliance with MSC"

I don't know what volumes that equates to though and clearly any loss is not good for the port.
 

Wavertreelad

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
731
Maersk are not pulling out completely. They will still operate to and from Felixstowe for services outside the Gemini agreement.


I don't know what volumes that equates to though and clearly any loss is not good for the port.
According to the eeSea liner database, the Danish carrier has four outside its existing 2M arrangement with MSC, due to end on 1 February, calling at Felixstowe.

These are: a North Europe-Mediterranean intra-regional service run in cooperation with Borchard Lines, Hapag-Lloyd, OOCL and Turkon; one feeder string to Scandinavia; and two Europe-Middle East services.

This means Felixstowe losses 3 x 24000 teu port calls per week, and retains
Borchard Lines, Hapag-Lloyd, OOCL and Turkon = 1 x 4500/5000 teu plus 1 x 6500 teu port call per week
One feeder string to Scandinavia = 1 x 3500 teu port call per week
Two Europe-Middle East services and India = 2 x 15000 teu port calls per week which were already due to transferred to London Gateway..

However I suspect the Scandinavia feeder will also quietly move to London Gateway because there is nothing at Felixstowe for it to connect too. All the Gemini Scandinavian feeders will operate from either Bremerhaven or Rotterdam and whilst the Felixstowe feeder only served Kotka, the clear purpose was to provide a feeder link with Bremerhaven, particularly for some Transatlantic Services that were advertised as calling at Felixstowe but actually have not called for about five years under the 2M banner and/or in standalone form.

Felixstowe will also loose some transhipment volumes as the three Asia Europe services and Indian Subcontinent services used the port as the transhipment port to serve UK East Coast ports of Immingham, Teesport, and Grangemouth. Some of these losses may retained if BG Feederline (owned by Peel Ports) and Unifeeder (owned by DP World) continue to call at Felixstowe for other customers and Maersk continues to offer Felixstowe bills of lading via Rotterdam and/or London Gateway.
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
4,779
Location
The Fens
There is more on the impact for Felixstowe here:


As a major container shipping company announces its larger vessels will stop using the Port of Felixstowe, what impact will that have?

Maersk said the changes would take effect in February following a review of its Asia-Europe shipping routes.

The firm said it had concluded the London Gateway on the Thames estuary in Essex was "the most optimal port to serve our customers" in the UK.

The BBC understands Maersk has two of its giant container ships docking each week, that will soon go to London Gateway.
 

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
808
According to the eeSea liner database, the Danish carrier has four outside its existing 2M arrangement with MSC, due to end on 1 February, calling at Felixstowe.

These are: a North Europe-Mediterranean intra-regional service run in cooperation with Borchard Lines, Hapag-Lloyd, OOCL and Turkon; one feeder string to Scandinavia; and two Europe-Middle East services.

This means Felixstowe losses 3 x 24000 teu port calls per week, and retains
Borchard Lines, Hapag-Lloyd, OOCL and Turkon = 1 x 4500/5000 teu plus 1 x 6500 teu port call per week
One feeder string to Scandinavia = 1 x 3500 teu port call per week
Two Europe-Middle East services and India = 2 x 15000 teu port calls per week which were already due to transferred to London Gateway..

However I suspect the Scandinavia feeder will also quietly move to London Gateway because there is nothing at Felixstowe for it to connect too. All the Gemini Scandinavian feeders will operate from either Bremerhaven or Rotterdam and whilst the Felixstowe feeder only served Kotka, the clear purpose was to provide a feeder link with Bremerhaven, particularly for some Transatlantic Services that were advertised as calling at Felixstowe but actually have not called for about five years under the 2M banner and/or in standalone form.

Felixstowe will also loose some transhipment volumes as the three Asia Europe services and Indian Subcontinent services used the port as the transhipment port to serve UK East Coast ports of Immingham, Teesport, and Grangemouth. Some of these losses may retained if BG Feederline (owned by Peel Ports) and Unifeeder (owned by DP World) continue to call at Felixstowe for other customers and Maersk continues to offer Felixstowe bills of lading via Rotterdam and/or London Gateway.
Thanks for the info
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,005
Location
North London or Mildmay line
One would assume the Ely services are routed that way because the paths exist,
Not necessarily, it’s more that the services via London are either ones that are electrically hauled (which obviously cannot go via Ely) or ones that have no paths via Ely, and the fact that Felixstowe - ECML is quicker via Ely. Via London would mean going via the Canonbury Curve.
raising the question of whether the paths from Ely, Peterborough, Leicester or Nuneaton to and from London Gateway Port are available or has Gemini just scored a big home goal?
You don’t need paths to Ely or Leicester - no freight leaves the cross-country route at those places. Indeed, the Cross-country route is the only intermodal-suitable route at both of those places, as both the WAML and MML are not cleared. Paths to Peterborough from Gateway are awkward as it means crossing the entire Great Eastern line at Forest Gate or Maryland - to Nuneaton is easier but Kensal Green Jn (and, indeed, the entire North London line) probably needs less trains rather than more!
 

Wavertreelad

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
731
Not necessarily, it’s more that the services via London are either ones that are electrically hauled (which obviously cannot go via Ely) or ones that have no paths via Ely, and the fact that Felixstowe - ECML is quicker via Ely. Via London would mean going via the Canonbury Curve.

You don’t need paths to Ely or Leicester - no freight leaves the cross-country route at those places. Indeed, the Cross-country route is the only intermodal-suitable route at both of those places, as both the WAML and MML are not cleared. Paths to Peterborough from Gateway are awkward as it means crossing the entire Great Eastern line at Forest Gate or Maryland - to Nuneaton is easier but Kensal Green Jn (and, indeed, the entire North London line) probably needs less trains rather than more!
Thanks for that explanation. The home goal issue I was alluding to was by moving from Felixstowe, Maersk, respectively Gemini may potentially loose rail capacity to the Midlands and North West of England because of the difficulties of using the cross country route and Kensal Green Jn, and North London Line, a situation which can only get worse as volumes through the port increase when the new berths announced a couple of months ago are commissioned.

As a matter of interest, are there still restrictions on the ECML to Scotland on high cube containers and/or intermodal trains. I vaguely recall high cube containers were at one time not allowed north of Doncaster(?) but that was many years ago and I have lost touch since.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,005
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Thanks for that explanation. The home goal issue I was alluding to was by moving from Felixstowe, Maersk, respectively Gemini may potentially loose rail capacity to the Midlands and North West of England because of the difficulties of using the cross country route and Kensal Green Jn, and North London Line, a situation which can only get worse as volumes through the port increase when the new berths announced a couple of months ago are commissioned.
Indeed - anything from Gateway has to use the North London line in some shape or form.
As a matter of interest, are there still restrictions on the ECML to Scotland on high cube containers and/or intermodal trains. I vaguely recall high cube containers were at one time not allowed north of Doncaster(?) but that was many years ago and I have lost touch since.
During the Carstairs blockade, intermodals from London Gateway and Felixstowe to Coatbridge were diverted via the ECML, so I assume it’s okay now.
 

Wavertreelad

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
731
Indeed - anything from Gateway has to use the North London line in some shape or form.

During the Carstairs blockade, intermodals from London Gateway and Felixstowe to Coatbridge were diverted via the ECML, so I assume it’s okay now.
Thanks for that, much appreciated.
 

Malaxa

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2022
Messages
167
Location
London
Indeed - anything from Gateway has to use the North London line in some shape or form.
except when trains are turned round in the Temple Mills loop, usually when there's a closure in the Canonbury- Finsbury Park area.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,005
Location
North London or Mildmay line
except when trains are turned round in the Temple Mills loop, usually when there's a closure in the Canonbury- Finsbury Park area.
That would be such a massive detour (assuming they then go up to Ipswich and cross-country) I don’t think that would be used in any situation except for emergencies.

Oh, and it still interacts with the NLL at Channelsea (twice).
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,005
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Now that we are just a few days away from the switch, does anyone have any information on what freight traffic is likely to switch ports on the railways?

Update 03/02 - no services seem to have switched port. Very strange. Guess there will be a lot of fresh air today.
 
Last edited:

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,005
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Today (18/02), Upper Holloway

4M88 Felixstowe - Ditton, as before, dominated by Maersk containers.

4L91 Trafford Park - London Gateway, very well-loaded but only one Maersk container.

Was kind of expecting the opposite in all honesty. Did the switch actually go ahead?
 

Wavertreelad

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2013
Messages
731
It's not a total switch away from Felixstowe; some of the Maersk ships will still be calling there - and it will probably take some time to fully implement as well.
The last Maersk ship with MSC at Felixstowe is scheduled to be MSC Isabella sailing on 09 Apr 2025 so I'd expect there will be a significant drop in Maersk volumes within a couple of weeks of this date at Felixstowe and a corresponding increase at London Gateway Port.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
3,005
Location
North London or Mildmay line
The last Maersk ship with MSC at Felixstowe is scheduled to be MSC Isabella sailing on 09 Apr 2025 so I'd expect there will be a significant drop in Maersk volumes within a couple of weeks of this date at Felixstowe and a corresponding increase at London Gateway Port.
Aha thank you. That makes sense.
 

Top