One thing I've observed, perhaps more so in the days of BR and early privatisation, is how "express" stock tends to build up more mileage than higher density "commuter" stock, by virtue of the former being out all day, while many "commuter" stock diagrams might be needed peak only.
For example on the Waterloo lines, most of the REPs, TCs and 442s were out all day whereas a significant proportion of the VEPs might have been used peak only.The BIGs and BEPs were often out all day too, as they provided catering facilities.
Did this cause any logistical difficulty, the fact that the express stock might rack up significantly more miles than the commuter stock? Or was it just accepted that the express stock might "wear out" more quickly, because they were out all day?
For example on the Waterloo lines, most of the REPs, TCs and 442s were out all day whereas a significant proportion of the VEPs might have been used peak only.The BIGs and BEPs were often out all day too, as they provided catering facilities.
Did this cause any logistical difficulty, the fact that the express stock might rack up significantly more miles than the commuter stock? Or was it just accepted that the express stock might "wear out" more quickly, because they were out all day?