mattjejackson
New Member
Too Long Didn't Read - If you break a return journey and then abandon it, can you get a refund for the remaining portion of the ticket from the break to the final destination?
I've tried to find the answer to this in the National Rail CoC, but no luck I don't think.
Essentials:
Ticket: Euro High Saver Return
Route: BRI -> LNE
Date out: 26/10/2023
Date return: 30/10/2023
The fare conditions state that you can't break the outward journey, but you can break the return.
I need to get to St Pancras from Bristol fair regularly. I live near to Parkway. For reasons I've never fully understood GWR's Euro High Savers from BPW are routed via either SAL or WMN to Waterloo. They're half the price of the route from BRI to PAD but often take three times as long.
Because the routeing via Wiltshire is much longer I start the journey at Temple Meads. Because the high savers from BRI are via any permitted route, depending on timetable I often get the return trip (once back at Paddington from St Pancras) on the trains to South Wales and get off at BPW. Because I can break the journey there I often just leave the station and if I have any cause to use the remainder of the trip to BRI later I will.
The CoC say at 29.2 "In such cases [where applying for a refund when you decide not to travel], a deduction from your refund in the case of part-used Tickets, will normally be calculated on the cost of the journey(s) actually made." There isn't a definition of "part-used" anywhere in the CoC.
I get that legally there are arguments one could make about where ambiguity arises it's to a consumer's benefit etc. But in practice would a TOC consider a return portion of a ticket "part-used" when you abandon the journey after breaking it, or would they say it's fully used because you started the return leg?
I get the portion from BPW to BRI won't be huge, but I'll be making the trip often enough on an ongoing basis to at least think about whether it's worth asking in the future. Obviously I strongly suspect the answer is "that's the price you pay for spending a third of the time travelling to the Eurostar".
I've tried to find the answer to this in the National Rail CoC, but no luck I don't think.
Essentials:
Ticket: Euro High Saver Return
Route: BRI -> LNE
Date out: 26/10/2023
Date return: 30/10/2023
The fare conditions state that you can't break the outward journey, but you can break the return.
I need to get to St Pancras from Bristol fair regularly. I live near to Parkway. For reasons I've never fully understood GWR's Euro High Savers from BPW are routed via either SAL or WMN to Waterloo. They're half the price of the route from BRI to PAD but often take three times as long.
Because the routeing via Wiltshire is much longer I start the journey at Temple Meads. Because the high savers from BRI are via any permitted route, depending on timetable I often get the return trip (once back at Paddington from St Pancras) on the trains to South Wales and get off at BPW. Because I can break the journey there I often just leave the station and if I have any cause to use the remainder of the trip to BRI later I will.
The CoC say at 29.2 "In such cases [where applying for a refund when you decide not to travel], a deduction from your refund in the case of part-used Tickets, will normally be calculated on the cost of the journey(s) actually made." There isn't a definition of "part-used" anywhere in the CoC.
I get that legally there are arguments one could make about where ambiguity arises it's to a consumer's benefit etc. But in practice would a TOC consider a return portion of a ticket "part-used" when you abandon the journey after breaking it, or would they say it's fully used because you started the return leg?
I get the portion from BPW to BRI won't be huge, but I'll be making the trip often enough on an ongoing basis to at least think about whether it's worth asking in the future. Obviously I strongly suspect the answer is "that's the price you pay for spending a third of the time travelling to the Eurostar".
Last edited: