• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

RAIB report issued for Old Street/Essex Road incident

Status
Not open for further replies.

ModernRailways

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Messages
2,116
The RAIB has issued it's report for the 'Penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London'.

Clicky clicky for full PDF file - will download and cost bandwidth for mobile users

Report name:
140213_R032014_Old_Street
Incident date:
08 March 2013
Category:
Heavy Rail,Metro
Summary:
Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) has released its report into the penetration and obstruction of a tunnel between Old Street and Essex Road stations, London, 8 March 2013. RAIB has made five recommendations and identified two learning points.

Previous thread can be found by clicking here
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,096
Location
Bolton
RAIB said:
The planned position of 19 of the 39 piles for the proposed building intersected the existing Down Moorgate line tunnel. The first of these piles to be drilled therefore breached the tunnel.

One very big cock up that!
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,096
Location
Bolton
I clearly need to read this RIAB report. They're not usually quite so sexually charged.

hehehe.

I particularly like the bit in that report that basically says Network Rail do not do anything to identify development that might interfere with their infrastructure, but relies on either developers or local authorities informing them. RAIB then look at what London Underground do:

89 London Underground owns a significant number of tunnels which are not
shown on Ordnance Survey mapping, and manages risk presented by nearby
development using a dedicated infrastructure protection team. LUL stated that it
manages risk by:
a. providing local planning authorities, neighbours, developers and others with
information on the location of surface and subsurface assets;
b. checking planning applications submitted to Local Planning Authorities, and
where necessary, either objecting or seeking modification;
c. responding to enquiries from Local Planning Authorities;
d. reviewing third party design and working methods; and
e. examining notices from utility companies.
90 The infrastructure protection team has issued Local Planning Authorities (London
Boroughs) with maps showing London Underground’s area of interest, 25 m
either side of the tunnel centrelines. It has asked the Local Planning Authorities
to advise it of any planning applications within these areas.
91 London Underground staff also walk the routes of tunnels at street level to look
for evidence of development work (eg demolition and site activity) which may not
have been identified by other processes. The streets above subsurface tunnels
(eg the Metropolitan, District and Circle Lines) are walked every four weeks, and
above deep tube routes every eight weeks.

Seems like an incredibly expensive time consuming process for LU there! Imagine Network Rail doing all that. It doesn't seem like their job to me either.
 
Last edited:

talltim

Established Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
2,454
I want this job
London Underground staff also walk the routes of tunnels at street level to look for evidence of development work (eg demolition and site activity) which may not have been identified by other processes. The streets above subsurface tunnels (eg the Metropolitan, District and Circle Lines) are walked every four weeks, and above deep tube routes every eight weeks.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,267
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
When you read all the investigations that the RAIB has had to do - in this case involving many parties that won't have much of a clue about RAIB - then its no surprise that its taken a year (give or take) for their report; although most of their reports seem to take about a year don't they?

Interestingly, unlike most reports from RAIB, once the Organisations Involved section lists all who were involved it doesn't have the usual line that they all freely co-operated with the investigation... <(
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,471
Location
UK
Is this another problem along with others highlighted post-privatisation where Network Rail (and Railtrack before it) had very poor records of its assets, having survived for years with local knowledge and detail 'in the heads' of certain people?

It certainly makes sense to have Network Rail have some sort of system to get in touch with developers anywhere near railway property - although isn't that tunnel (I am yet to read the report) formerly that of London Underground? Could it be that sufficient records were never handed over?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
32,941
Is this another problem along with others highlighted post-privatisation where Network Rail (and Railtrack before it) had very poor records of its assets, having survived for years with local knowledge and detail 'in the heads' of certain people?

Not at all - it's more to do with the fact that the national mapping agency (Ordnance Survey) as a matter of policy does not map 'deep tunnels' on the maps that everyone else uses, in building control, planning etc etc.

It is definitely nothing to do with post-privatisation matters. The main culpability seems to me to be with the ground investigation sub-contractor - but you should read the report...
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
29,471
Location
UK
I will. That's why I wanted to emphasise the fact I've not read it yet.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,267
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
It is definitely nothing to do with post-privatisation matters. The main culpability seems to me to be with the ground investigation sub-contractor - but you should read the report...

Yep, seems to have been a few opportunities in this sorry tale of more then one party ignoring recommendations/advice to check further into below ground infrastructure. Transport for London advised the developer to check for infrastructure belonging to other rail service providers... which the developers (and their agents) failed to do.

Indeed mention is made of a specialist registry search firm who didn't check with Network Rail because
"it did not believe that Network Rail supplied a bespoke conveyancing search service to define rail infrastructure." :rolleyes:

You can almost sense the frustration of the RAIB as they even put in a paragraph commenting on the developer's laissez-faire attitude after noting mention of the Great Northern and City Railway in the Land Registry entry for the site they were developing.
RAIB said:
The RAIB has undertaken a Google search for ‘Great Northern and City Railway’.... The first three pages listed all explain the linkage between GN&CR and modern train services to Hertford.

Pure class - thats basically saying that a 2 minute google search should have started the alarm bells ringing. :o
 

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,498
Location
Norwich
Pure class - thats basically saying that a 2 minute google search should have started the alarm bells ringing. :o

What really should have set alarm bells of is point 59;

RAIB said:
The site investigation contractor completed its ground investigation report in December 2011 and issued it to the structural engineer. The report recorded a ‘possible man-made obstruction 14 m below ground level’ at the base of borehole 1, and advised ‘this is not thought to be associated with the tube network but may relate to the London sewer network.’ It concluded, ‘Further investigation into the structure will be required prior to any piling design.’

This just seems to be pure incompetence on the part of the surveyors of the building mixed with confusing around the existence of the tunnel due to a chequered ownership history.
 

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
3,267
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
This just seems to be pure incompetence on the part of the surveyors of the building mixed with confusing around the existence of the tunnel due to a chequered ownership history.

Will be interesting to hear if any of these folk get hauled over the coals now that the report is out... even though that isn't the purpose of RAIB investigations.

Also wonder what happened re the development of the site?

Looking at figure 20 which shows almost all of the 39 piles required to support the building enter within the 5 metre vertical and horizontal exclusion zone that Network Rail use around tunnels then that'd have scuppered any chance of continuing with the development?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2014-02-13 19:36:36.png
    Screenshot from 2014-02-13 19:36:36.png
    57.4 KB · Views: 101

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
3,219
Location
Lancashire
interesting that in the appendices they have missed out the Liverpool Underground system from the list of areas to be aware that underground tunnels are not shown on OS maps
 

fsmr

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
659
Will be interesting to hear if any of these folk get hauled over the coals now that the report is out... even though that isn't the purpose of RAIB investigations.

Also wonder what happened re the development of the site?

Looking at figure 20 which shows almost all of the 39 piles required to support the building enter within the 5 metre vertical and horizontal exclusion zone that Network Rail use around tunnels then that'd have scuppered any chance of continuing with the development?

It will be down to the HSE to prosecute much the same as digging through a high pressure gas or oil pipeline would be treated as a dangerous occurrence, however there are a number of other parties involved not just the piling contactor and has already been said, NWR dont come out clean either.

You can bet though that every procedure and item of paperwork method statement and risk assessment has been checked to the last detail and any transgression added to a case against the developers and construction site managers
 

SPADTrap

Established Member
Joined
15 Oct 2012
Messages
2,354
ITV news just reported this on tonight's program, not the report but the incident itself, as if it happened tonight! Catch up lol.
 

fsmr

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
659
ITV news just reported this on tonight's program, not the report but the incident itself, as if it happened tonight! Catch up lol.

The daily mail had the picture of the train and augers embedded in their UK storm story for some time this afternoon!!:roll:
 

Murph

Member
Joined
16 Feb 2010
Messages
728
Will be interesting to hear if any of these folk get hauled over the coals now that the report is out... even though that isn't the purpose of RAIB investigations.

Also wonder what happened re the development of the site?

Looking at figure 20 which shows almost all of the 39 piles required to support the building enter within the 5 metre vertical and horizontal exclusion zone that Network Rail use around tunnels then that'd have scuppered any chance of continuing with the development?

Their structural plan for the foundation is certainly dead in the water now, I'd think, with very little of the site being suitable for piling. They might well be able to build the block itself by using a different type of foundation.

There's a 80s or 90s residential development built across Edinburgh's Scotland Street Tunnel near the north end of it (and a shopping centre which integrated a tunnel rebuild into its foundation at the south end). It had to construct effectively a quite substantial subterranean bridge across the tunnel, transferring the load into safe ground either side of the tunnel. Those blocks are smaller than the one proposed here, but I'd imaging that the same technique could work (with considerable cost) for this case.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,111
Location
Leeds
interesting that in the appendices they have missed out the Liverpool Underground system from the list of areas to be aware that underground tunnels are not shown on OS maps

Isn't that because the underground lines in Liverpool ARE shown on OS maps? The Northen line tunnels are even shown on small scale one and the Wirral loop on larger scale ones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top