• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Should the NPR services have 1st Class?

Should Liverpool-York NPR services have 1st class seating?


  • Total voters
    67
Status
Not open for further replies.

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
A bit of a perennial debate about 1st v standard class, but with NPR services I wonder if it is suitable or not. This question is specifically about the Liverpool-York NPR services.

The Integrated Rail Plan (IRP) have a potential clue to how services that use the NPR line will run, with those being:
  • 2 tph HS2 Birmingham-Manchester-Newcastle
  • 2 tph HS2 London-Liverpool
  • 4 tph NPR Liverpool-York
The HS2 services will probably have 1st class and may require compulsory seat reservations. The NPR services between Liverpool & York should be more commuter focussed, with no requirement for seat reservations and potentially should run more like the Southeastern HS1 services. The services will run for approximately 100 miles, with 7 stations on the route. The IRP has indicated a possible journey time of roughly 90 minutes. In my opinion, the NPR trains should have doors at thirds to aid passenger flow.

With all of that considered, I would argue that 1st class should not be included on Liverpool-York NPR services.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
8,251
Location
Wilmslow
Liverpool-Newcastle should have first class, yes, it's far enough to warrant it.
Probably the first time ever that I went first class was Liverpool-Manchester (Victoria) in the 1970s. My dad went to Liverpool on business and gave me his return ticket, which wasn't used, so I bought a single to Liverpool and came back in an early Mark 2 compartment first class to Manchester.
But, memories aside, Liverpool-York warrants an option for first class in my opinion, in which the service provider can offer more than different seats, if they want to. Back in the 1970s it was novelty to me but all I got was a larger seat.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
Liverpool-Newcastle should have first class, yes, it's far enough to warrant it.
Probably the first time ever that I went first class was Liverpool-Manchester (Victoria) in the 1970s. My dad went to Liverpool on business and gave me his return ticket, which wasn't used, so I bought a single to Liverpool and came back in an early Mark 2 compartment first class to Manchester.
But, memories aside, Liverpool-York warrants an option for first class in my opinion, in which the service provider can offer more than different seats, if they want to. Back in the 1970s it was novelty to me but all I got was a larger seat.

It doesn’t look like there will be a Liverpool-Newcastle service. Of the 6 ECML fast services between York & Newcastle, two services appear to be heading on to Manchester which would be the Birmingham trains. That leaves Liverpool-York, which is effectively a commuter service no different to Southeastern HS1.
 
Last edited:

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,329
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Yes. Only urban commuter type services around cities should not. Offering it on long distance services is a key part of attracting people to leave premium cars at home.

Despite the journey time this won't be used as a daily commuter service; the price will be prohibitive. It is more like the Euston-Birmingham Avanti services than much else, and while I'm not getting into door position prejudice, InterCity interiors are right for these.

I would however prefer First Class to be sold at a 150% multiplier and not come with freebies other than possibly very cheap to deliver ones like free tea, coffee and water.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It doesn’t look like there will be a Liverpool-Newcastle service. Of the 6 ECML fast services between York & Newcastle, two services appear to be heading on to Manchester which would be the Birmingham trains. That leaves Liverpool-York, which is effectively a commuter service no different to Southeastern HS1.

It is very different to HS1 in terms of how it will be used.
 

matacaster

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2013
Messages
1,645
Location
Huddersfield
First class should be provided as long as there is sufficient second class provision. Eg now that there are lots more doubled-up 185's, first class is a sensible offering, but was wrong when people couldn't get on a single set.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
11,758
Location
Salford Quays, Manchester
Yes. Only urban commuter type services around cities should not. Offering it on long distance services is a key part of attracting people to leave premium cars at home.

Despite the journey time this won't be used as a daily commuter service; the price will be prohibitive. It is more like the Euston-Birmingham Avanti services than much else, and while I'm not getting into door position prejudice, InterCity interiors are right for these.

I would however prefer First Class to be sold at a 150% multiplier and not come with freebies other than possibly very cheap to deliver ones like free tea, coffee and water.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



It is very different to HS1 in terms of how it will be used.
Door position prejudice is something you invented to defend 350s and the like from criticism... It is a valid point that Intercity stock require carriages with saloons and vestibules with end doors, and first class, to run a decent long distance service.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
Yes. Only urban commuter type services around cities should not. Offering it on long distance services is a key part of attracting people to leave premium cars at home.

Despite the journey time this won't be used as a daily commuter service; the price will be prohibitive. It is more like the Euston-Birmingham Avanti services than much else, and while I'm not getting into door position prejudice, InterCity interiors are right for these.

I would however prefer First Class to be sold at a 150% multiplier and not come with freebies other than possibly very cheap to deliver ones like free tea, coffee and water.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==



It is very different to HS1 in terms of how it will be used.

I don’t see how a Liverpool-York NPR service that is not intended for end-to-end journeys fits the requirement of being an Intercity service, or at least a service similar to HS2. The whole purpose of NPR is to enable faster commuting to Manchester & Leeds and I see no reason why the price should be prohibitive.
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,358
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
The whole purpose of NPR is to enable faster commuting to Manchester & Leeds and I see no reason why the price should be prohibitive.
Really? NPR's aim is supposed to be speeding up inter-city journeys across the north of England, not long distance commuting, which should actively be discouraged. [I am not referring to shorter distance journeys such as Warrington to Manchester, which might be undertaken via NPR if it ever gets built.]
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
Really? NPR's aim is supposed to be speeding up inter-city journeys across the north of England, not long distance commuting, which should actively be discouraged. [I am not referring to shorter distance journeys such as Warrington to Manchester, which might be undertaken via NPR if it ever gets built.]
Of course it is. It’s never been about Liverpool to Leeds for instance. It’s about Leeds to Manchester first and foremost, Liverpool to Manchester secondary and Liverpool to Leeds being a nice to have.

If anyone thought it was about speeding up long distance services, then they have completely misunderstood the concept. That is a byproduct.
 
Last edited:

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
On a Liverpool, Warrington, MAN, Piccadilly, Huddersfield, Leeds, York service?
What's the problem? @Bletchleyite suggest something similar and I agree with him. Slapping an antimacassar that says 'First Class' on some standard class seats and doing nothing else doesn't make it first class. The current Liverpool to York service has exactly the same offering in first class.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
What's the problem? @Bletchleyite suggest something similar and I agree with him. Slapping an antimacassar that says 'First Class' on some standard class seats and doing nothing else doesn't make it first class. The current Liverpool to York service has exactly the same offering in first class.
It seems overkill for a service that will primarily be about journeys under 40 minutes on the whole.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
It's a basic first class service, again, what is the problem with it? It's no more than what TPE currently offer.

It’s not a long distance service to begin with, but more importantly for the type of journeys it will facilitate, I can’t see the market existing for 1st class. So why waste the space? By all means have 1st on the Birmingham-Manchester-Newcastle services, as there will be a decent market for that.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
Eh? I'm sorry, what?
It’s 100 miles end-to-end, but the Liverpool-York flow is a very small proportion of the whole, as is Liverpool-Leeds. It’s a service that stitches together several shorter distance journeys and if those journeys were to have their own dedicated service, nobody would be saying it’s an intercity service that requires 1st class.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
It’s 100 miles end-to-end, but the Liverpool-York flow is a very small proportion of the whole, as is Liverpool-Leeds. It’s a service that stitches together several shorter distance journeys and if those journeys were to have their own dedicated service, nobody would be saying it’s an intercity service that requires 1st class.
But it is supposed to go onto Hull and Newcastle.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,325
Location
St Albans
Eh? I'm sorry, what?
I don't know why distance is quoted so much as a deciding factor for either 1st class or end doors. It time that passengers will spend on the train that matters. That is one of the reasons why these facilities are becoming more scarce, and with HS rail, few journeys undertaken will be more than 2hrs and the bulk of them will be under one hour. Just look at HS1, London to Ashford takes about 40 mins with.two intermediate stops. That's similar to a commuter train to MK or Bedford or a stopper to Reading. Rolling stock design on high density corridors where a mixture of journeys are made is always going to be a compromise. Passengers travelling for 40-80 minutes are more in need of a seat than a specific type of accommodation, e.g. end door saloons or 2+1 1st class. The fact that the train moves twice as fast and covers to he distance in half the current time is irrelevant.
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,358
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
It’s about Leeds to Manchester first and foremost
I agree. That is an inter-city journey of 40 miles, not really commuting distance. However, while this is the core segment, other travellers will be making longer journeys, to York and beyond, and Hull. It is the one route within the north of England where some first class provision is probably warranted.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
I don't know why distance is quoted so much as a deciding factor for either 1st class or end doors. It time that passengers will spend on the train that matters.
First class is offered on TGV services from Paris to CDG Airport. I can get a first class ticket from Manchester Piccadilly to Manchester Victoria. If punters are willing to pay, why not?
That is one of the reasons why these facilities are becoming more scarce, and with HS rail, few journeys undertaken will be more than 2hrs and the bulk of them will be under one hour.
The bonnie land of Scotland, will be served by HS2 services.
Just look at HS1, London to Ashford takes about 40 mins with.two intermediate stops. That's similar to a commuter train to MK or Bedford or a stopper to Reading. Rolling stock design on high density corridors where a mixture of journeys are made is always going to be a compromise. Passengers travelling for 40-80 minutes are more in need of a seat than a specific type of accommodation, e.g. end door saloons or 2+1 1st class.
The domestic HS1 services are a bad comparison as they aren't Intercity services, more high speed commuter services. NPR service will be expect to go from Liverpool to Newcastle.
 

tomuk

Established Member
Joined
15 May 2010
Messages
2,009
No first class should only be available on 'InterCity' services on the WCML, ECML and GWML. It should be withdrawn on all other routes. To attract people from 'premium cars?' the longer 'express' services should have an improved accommodation throughout like the Chiltern Clubman 168s.
 

Purple Orange

On Moderation
Joined
26 Dec 2019
Messages
3,458
Location
The North
But it is supposed to go onto Hull and Newcastle.
It’s not. The Birmingham-Manchester HS2 services will, but the Liverpool NPR services are intended to go as far as York.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I agree. That is an inter-city journey of 40 miles, not really commuting distance. However, while this is the core segment, other travellers will be making longer journeys, to York and beyond, and Hull. It is the one route within the north of England where some first class provision is probably warranted.

40 miles is not a great distance at all, but the key is journey times. 33 minutes is commutable. Also, and I can’t stress this enough, but the services in question are purely Liverpool-York. The Birmingham-Newcastle via Manchester would warrant a 1st class section.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
15,325
Location
St Albans
First class is offered on TGV services from Paris to CDG Airport. I can get a first class ticket from Manchester Piccadilly to Manchester Victoria. If punters are willing to pay, why not?
The first class tickets from Paccadilly to the airport are for travelling on services that have taken 2 maybe 3 hours from their origins, (e.g. Barrow, Redcar etc.) If those trains started at Piccadilly for their 20 minutes to the airport there wouldn't be any 1st class offer.

The bonnie land of Scotland, will be served by HS2 services.
That is off-topic, this thread is about NPR services. HS2 services are different, especially when they are taking over three hours to get to NPR lines.

The domestic HS1 services are a bad comparison as they aren't Intercity services, more high speed commuter services. NPR service will be expect to go from Liverpool to Newcastle.
They are journeys that take only 40 minutes, - there is little justification for wasting limited capacity with 1st class for such a short journey, hence the reason why there is no provision.
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
The first class tickets from Paccadilly to the airport are for travelling on services that have taken 2 maybe 3 hours from their origins
They could also easily not sell first class tickets from Piccadilly to Victoria (or the Airport, of which MAN wasn't mentioned but whatever), but they do.
If those trains started at Piccadilly for their 20 minutes to the airport there wouldn't be any 1st class offer.
I wouldn't be so sure. See Heathrow Express.
That is off-topic, this thread is about NPR services. HS2 services are different, especially when they are taking over three hours to get to NPR lines.
Nothing about this statement makes any sense. You made a generalised statement about HSR and I made a response to it. Also what is this 3 hours to NPR stuff?
 

LOL The Irony

On Moderation
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
5,335
Location
Chinatown, New York
They are journeys that take only 40 minutes, - there is little justification for wasting limited capacity with 1st class for such a short journey, hence the reason why there is no provision.
You already said that and I said nothing against them doing that.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,329
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
No first class should only be available on 'InterCity' services on the WCML, ECML and GWML. It should be withdrawn on all other routes. To attract people from 'premium cars?' the longer 'express' services should have an improved accommodation throughout like the Chiltern Clubman 168s.

Apart from the awful window alignment in the mk5s and my personal dislike of Fainsa's finest, it is hard to say TPE doesn't have the best Standard Class accommodation in the country. I would hope any new NPR stock would continue that.

As for 1st, if people will pay for it, why not?

End doors have more to do with loading (I doubt anyone would see them as a problem on rural branch lines) so I think maybe not the best plan but not a massive problem either if standardising with HS2 is more useful.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
105,329
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
If it is to have a homogenous fleet with HS2, it'll have to have the same amenities as HS2, so therefore, offer first class accommodation.

For clarity I made that point about end doors, not about First Class which I definitely think should be provided.

If not going the same as HS2, with regard to door positions, I am sure Stadler could do something very suitable with the Giruno platform, perhaps some coaches with two doors and some with one with different layouts taking into account the different use cases. I have joked about the best formation for busy services from Euston being a couple of 350/2s then a /1 at the front because people won't walk along, but I think there is actually something in that sort of approach, a bit like the Sheffield trams which have accessible, standee end sections for quick and easy access and short trips, but an effectively end doored, all seater middle section for longer trips.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top