185
Established Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 5,504
Just heard a rather interesting one regarding the eligibility for FIP cards which is normally a one-year wait. Scratching my own head at this one...
-Employee 1 has been on the railway for years.
-Employee 1 has been married to Person 2 for years.
-Employee 1 and their spouse, Person 2 had to wait for one year for a FIP.
-After a year they are both eligible for FIP, No 1 as Staff, No 2 as Spouse.
-Then, Person 2 decides to open the gates of hell and join the railway.
-Person 2 has held a FIP, as a spouse for some years.
-Person.. sorry, now Employee 2 is told by RSTL to rip up the FIP card and... wait another year for FIP.
The union reckons RSTL are 'probably' wrong as the one-year wait has already passed, stating no 2 should at the very least retain spouse eligibility for the first year. RSTL claim the pass must be destroyed as it has been issued under a 'now deleted spouse profile'. It's an odd situation with both RSTL and the Union interpreting the wording of the entitlement rules seemingly correctly.
Anyone shed any light on this from previous decisions? Regardless, our wayward travellers are in no rush to get a FIP, in light of currently serving indefinite lockdown sentences in HMP Great Britannia at Boris' pleasure
-Employee 1 has been on the railway for years.
-Employee 1 has been married to Person 2 for years.
-Employee 1 and their spouse, Person 2 had to wait for one year for a FIP.
-After a year they are both eligible for FIP, No 1 as Staff, No 2 as Spouse.
-Then, Person 2 decides to open the gates of hell and join the railway.
-Person 2 has held a FIP, as a spouse for some years.
-Person.. sorry, now Employee 2 is told by RSTL to rip up the FIP card and... wait another year for FIP.
The union reckons RSTL are 'probably' wrong as the one-year wait has already passed, stating no 2 should at the very least retain spouse eligibility for the first year. RSTL claim the pass must be destroyed as it has been issued under a 'now deleted spouse profile'. It's an odd situation with both RSTL and the Union interpreting the wording of the entitlement rules seemingly correctly.
Anyone shed any light on this from previous decisions? Regardless, our wayward travellers are in no rush to get a FIP, in light of currently serving indefinite lockdown sentences in HMP Great Britannia at Boris' pleasure
