• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Stagecoach-Disowning the past

Status
Not open for further replies.

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
2,102
Interesting article in the Sunday Times today in which the new CEO of Stagecoach, Claire Miles, disowns the past of the company, regarding it as having been intolerant, castle-grabbing bus bandits of the worst kind.

Unfortunately behind a paywall but well worth £3.50 of anybody's money.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

W-on-Sea

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
1,395
The pertinent part of the article doesn't say anything about Stagecoach's past business practices (eg in the wild 80s or 90s) - indeed I get the impression that Miles might not even be aware of that, but rather reads as follows:

“Miles, in the clearest message of our conversation, wants to draw a line under Stagecoach’s participation in culture wars under Souter and Gloag. “They are nowhere near the business,” she says. “They had a massive impact on the business reputation and created a legacy for us.

I am absolutely determined, going forward, that we will show up as a different type of company. Non-political. Non-judgmental. Embracing openness and diversity. All of that is really important to me and that is how I will run the business.”
Has she spoken to Souter or Gloag since joining Stagecoach nearly three months ago? “No,” is the curt response""

Url of article is https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/stagecoach-boss-cklaire-miles-bus-industry-interview-k2jfkmcv2
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mwanesh

Member
Joined
14 May 2016
Messages
884
She is talking nonsense. She should just get on with the job. Hope she is not all talk and no action.
 

Blindtraveler

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
10,408
Location
Nowhere near enough to a Pacer :(
Sounds as if the very best that we can take from this is that they are going to have little or nothing to do with politics or political allegiances in future which suits me fine as not only did I violently disagree with Soutar's politics, but it probably doesn't pay from a big business point of view to demonstrate their feelings on such issues so noticeably as they, and indeed others, have done in the past.
 

Djgr

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2018
Messages
2,102
The pertinent part of the article doesn't say anything about Stagecoach's past business practices (eg in the wild 80s or 90s) - indeed I get the impression that Miles might not even be aware of that, but rather reads as follows:



Url of article is https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/stagecoach-boss-cklaire-miles-bus-industry-interview-k2jfkmcv2
The article does also talk about Stagecoach's far more recent business practice of attempting to thwart the electors of Greater Manchester over franchising, presumably by putting the interests of the shareholders over those of its customers. It suggests that this business practice would not be acceptable now.
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,767
The article does also talk about Stagecoach's far more recent business practice of attempting to thwart the electors of Greater Manchester over franchising, presumably by putting the interests of the shareholders over those of its customers. It suggests that this business practice would not be acceptable now.
A company's first duty is towards its shareholders though.
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,767
And there's the problem with privatisation...buses, trains, gas, water, Royal Mail...all broken
Well, I wouldn't say the municipal buses round here are any better or worse than the privately owned ones. Not-for-profit Welsh Water is more expensive than Thames. The passenger railway (bar the Open Access operators) is nationalised or effectively so and isn't noticeably better than the franchised system. I could go on but we're going off topic.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
7,876
Location
Wilmslow
Would be interested to see a full quote of this if anyone's able to provide one
From
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/stagecoach-boss-cklaire-miles-bus-industry-interview-k2jfkmcv2, the original poster should have provided this but here you are:
INTERVIEW
Stagecoach was mired in controversy — meet the woman shaking things up
Claire Miles’s background is in mathematical modelling for the military. Now she aims to solve the problems of the bus industry​

Oliver Gill
Sunday December 24 2023, 12.01am, The Sunday Times
Trying to prove her doubters wrong seems to be in Claire Miles’s DNA. “When I was at school, my career advice was absolutely shocking. I was told I should be a hairdresser or a nurse,” she says. “And I was, like: ‘Er, no’.”
The 51-year-old recently climbed into the metaphorical driving seat at Stagecoach, arguably the best-known name in Britain’s traditionally blokey transport sector. Despite putting on the obligatory hi-vis vest, her sharp blue suit and high heels sets her apart from the bus drivers enjoying their lunch as we walk through the mess hall at the Stagecoach bus depot in Sharston, south Manchester.
Her eclectic career has seen her working in war games for the military and crunching numbers. Her achievements span finance and energy. Even so, buses seem an unusual choice — and especially Stagecoach, a company that comes with cultural and political baggage.
The brainchild of Perth siblings Sir Brian Souter and Dame Ann Gloag, Stagecoach was a champion of Thatcherite reforms that deregulated the bus market in the early 1980s. But while Stagecoach went from strength to strength on the road, the company was dogged by controversy off it. Souter and Gloag sold their remaining shareslast year as part of a £595 million take-private deal by German infrastructure fund DWS.

Souter has enraged gay rights and pro-choice campaigners alike over the years. In 2000, the tycoon opposed the abolition of laws in Scotland that prohibited “intentionally promoting homosexuality”, giving £1 million to the cause.
He defends his views on religious grounds but shrugging off criticism has proved difficult. In 2019, for instance, pressure from gay rights campaigners forced the Turner Prize to end a sponsorship deal with Stagecoach a day after it was announced.
In February this year, Souter hit the headlines by condemning late-term abortions, likening terminations up until birth for foetuses with serious anomalies to the biblical slaughter of the innocents by King Herod.
Gloag is no stranger to controversy either. Alongside her husband, David McCleary, and two other family members, she faces charges of people trafficking. In July she issued a statement that “strongly disputes the malicious allegations” and vowed to “vigorously defend herself and the work of her foundation”.
Miles, in the clearest message of our conversation, wants to draw a line under Stagecoach’s participation in culture wars under Souter and Gloag. “They are nowhere near the business,” she says. “They had a massive impact on the business reputation and created a legacy for us.
“I am absolutely determined, going forward, that we will show up as a different type of company. Non-political. Non-judgmental. Embracing openness and diversity. All of that is really important to me and that is how I will run the business.”
Has she spoken to Souter or Gloag since joining Stagecoach nearly three months ago? “No,” is the curt response.
Indeed, she and the company have wasted no time in creating a more modern feeling culture lately
Stagecoach has increased the number of female drivers. In 2018 the company was broadly in line with of national average of 8.6 per cent. “Eleven per cent of our drivers are female,” says Miles. “And yes, I do wish that was higher. But it does have this history and perception that it is a very blokey thing to do.
“As an organisation, we provide shifts that can work for mothers that need to take the kids to school and pick them up — we’ve got 10am till 2pm shifts.”
Stagecoach has worked with trade unions to set up a joint women’s committee to look at innovative working practices. Miles explains: “We are in the process of developing a policy for supporting women going through the menopause. If they need to take time off for appointments, or if they’re not feeling well. We’re one of the first companies to offer paid leave for staff who’ve gone through a miscarriage.”
Miles, who says she has little knowledge or experience of running a bus company, joins Stagecoach with the bus sector at a crossroads. Decades of deregulation are being put into reverse as metro mayors and local authorities tighten their grip on public transport provision.
Up until recently, bus companies outside London were largely free to run whatever routes they wanted. Unsurprisingly, they ran the services that generated the most fare income, often withdrawing from those that were more sparsely-used.
Under the “franchising model”, used by Transport for London since privatisation, a local authority can decide routes, fares, frequencies and vehicle standards and pay operators to run services on their behalf. Operators are paid a flat fee no matter how many passengers there are. That provides a stable income, but effectively caps its profit.
Bus franchising in Greater Manchester has been a central policy for Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor for the region. The west of England, West Yorkshire and Cambridge want to follow suit.
Stagecoach was one of two operators to challenge Burnham’s franchising plans in a High Court case that ultimately failed. That was before Miles’s watch and it is another chapter of the company’s history on which she wants to turn the page.
“No matter what the local authority’s view is on how they want their bus services to be run — whether that’s through franchising, like is happening here in Manchester — we will work with it.
“There’ve been a lot of statements made in the past about where we want to operate and how. The reality is that we need to do what’s right for customers. And if franchising is the right answer for that, we’ll get on board with franchising.”
Her pragmatic approach would appear to chime with the attitude of DWS, Stagecoach’s new owner, which was spun out of Deutsche Bank in 2018. Like other infrastructure investors, DWS looks for the steady returns that the franchise model should deliver.
Another big change for the UK bus business also goes in Stagecoach’s favour: in areas outside London with no franchising system, the government has capped fares at £2, subsidising the operator for the rest of the cost. This has driven up the number of people using its services without hitting its profit margins.
The cap was intended to get people back on buses after the Covid pandemic and seems to have worked: bus patronage in the first 11 days of December averaged 94 per cent of pre-pandemic levels, according to the Department for Transport. On every Sunday since April 16, passenger numbers are above pre-pandemic levels.
Rail and Tube usage, by comparison, remains at about 80 per cent of pre-Covid levels. Despite buses’ low profile in the public consciousness, twice as many people use them than trains.
It is not all going in Miles’s favour, she insists: “There’s a lot to do. The future won’t be straightforward, I’m sure.”
Near the top of her priorities is overhauling the company’s fleet of 8,300 mainly diesel-powered buses. Stagecoach aims to be a zero-emission operator by 2030 and there is a lot of catching up to do to hit that goal.
Capital expenditure ground to halt during Covid as plunging passenger numbers left bus operators relying on state aid to stay afloat. Investing in electric or hydrogen-electric powered buses was not a priority.
Now in her 12th week in the job, Miles has been on a tour of the country, visiting depots, speaking to many of the 24,000-strong workforce and their customers.
“It has been difficult to invest over the past few years. You can see it, the business hasn’t had investment for a while, so there is a lot to do with catching up and replenishing the fleet and getting into electrification,” she says.
Another challenge is finding people to drive buses. One result of Covid was that a significant number of drivers left their jobs. That trend was reinforced in 2021 when many more were snaffled by lorry companies desperate for people after a Brexit exodus of European HGV drivers. It left the bus sector 4,000 drivers short.
Miles says the industry’s HR teams still see the fallout. “The profile of the applicant has changed for many reasons. Typically people applying for the job have less driver experience. It takes longer to train them and get them to feel confident driving a bus.”
Born in Bishop Auckland, Co Durham, Miles moved to Skipton, Yorkshire, aged ten. In spite of her school’s questionable careers advice, she went to read maths and business at Aston University in Birmingham, sandwiched with a placement year as an auditor with the Audit Commission, now the National Audit Office, in Manchester.
She then studied mathematical modelling at the Royal Military College of Science in Shrivenham, Oxfordshire, during which time she was an honorary lieutenant. “I studied the same maths I would have done elsewhere but in the format of war gaming, game theory and modelling trajectories of rockets,” she says.
During her postgraduate studies Miles went on to develop models to be used for automated loan decisions, one of which was subsequently used by Barclays in the mid-1990s.
Her first “proper” job was mortality modelling for Frizzell Insurance, the Bournemouth company that became part of LV. She then moved into managing credit card portfolios for GE Capital and then Santander before landing at British Gas. During her decade with the energy group, Miles oversaw its energy-efficiency arm and led the rollout of its Hive smart meters. After British Gas, Miles was chief executive of Yell, the online directory.
Since leaving college Miles has lived in Twickenham, southwest London. She juggles her Stagecoach job and a non-executive directorship at waste company Biffa with being a single mother. She has sons aged 11 and 14 and two spaniels (also male) to look after.
“It’s four of them covered in mud all the time,” she says. “I spend a lot of time cleaning.”
She adds: “I’ve spent all my life in male-dominated environments. From studying maths to actuarial work, and then running a business that has frontline teams of engineers. It’s never been a problem for me.”
If only those school careers advisers could hear her now.
The Life of Claire Miles
Born: September 3, 1972
Status: divorced, two sons aged 14 and 11 — two spaniels
School: Skipton Girls High School
University: Aston, BSc maths & business. Cranfield, MSC mathematical modelling
First job: retail assistant in a builders’ merchant on Saturdays, selling bricks and pipework with zero knowledge!
Home: Twickenham, southwest London
Car: black Range Rover Sport, bought second-hand
Favourite book: Man on Wire by Philippe Petit
Drink: Ruinart champagne or Peroni
Film: Goodfellas
Music: all kinds from Elvis Presley to Dolly Parton, the Beatles and Eminem. “I love introducing my boys to rock legends with many Saturday mornings spent dancing in the kitchen”
Gadget: Dualit hand blender to make smoothies for my kids as the best way to get vitamins into them
Last holiday: three weeks, coast-to-coast in Canada with my boys


Working day
The Stagecoach boss is up at 5am to walk the dogs and if she is working in London this is followed by a 5k run on the treadmill; otherwise she heads to Euston to catch a train to one of Stagecoach’s regions. Typically she meets her teams in the depots where the customer and employee experience comes to life.

Downtime
Weekends are normally spent with her boys and dogs, walking, homework, football matches and training sessions. Whenever possible they travel for weekends away
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
4,002
Well, I wouldn't say the municipal buses round here are any better or worse than the privately owned ones. Not-for-profit Welsh Water is more expensive than Thames. The passenger railway (bar the Open Access operators) is nationalised or effectively so and isn't noticeably better than the franchised system. I could go on but we're going off topic.
The municipal buses where I am, (Blackpool) ae far better than in any of the towns I have lived in where private bus companies have run the services, if stagecoach could perform as well as them it would be great.
 

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
371
Location
Stockport
A company's first duty is towards its shareholders though.
Of course it is. But franchising has never been guaranteed to be BAD for shareholders. There was always risk - risk that Stagecoach could lose everything so be bad. Stagecoach Manchester is, after all, their biggest non-London operation. But there was always opportunity in it as well. As seen by the fact they've won franchises.

It's more likely that their anti-franchising stance was more ideological.
 

Surreyman

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2012
Messages
995
Of course it is. But franchising has never been guaranteed to be BAD for shareholders. There was always risk - risk that Stagecoach could lose everything so be bad. Stagecoach Manchester is, after all, their biggest non-London operation. But there was always opportunity in it as well. As seen by the fact they've won franchises.

It's more likely that their anti-franchising stance was more ideological.
My take on this - reading between the lines of the 'Corporate Froth' is that Stagecoach is now open to franchising and any type of profitable business.
Stagecoach have been awarded the franchise for north/north east Greater Manchester, including their existing operations in this area so are they really going to retain Hyde rd/Sharston? (I would be very happy if they did).
 

TheGrandWazoo

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Feb 2013
Messages
21,021
Location
Somerset with international travel (e.g. across th
Is there not a bit of over analysis and projection going on here by some posters?

This looks like the CEO saying that things will be different in terms of their culture and ethics, very specifically saying

I am absolutely determined, going forward, that we will show up as a different type of company. Non-political. Non-judgmental. Embracing openness and diversity. All of that is really important to me and that is how I will run the business

That looks like a clear reference to the political manoeuvres of Brian Souter (support of the SNP), as well as the well documented support by Souter of Clause 28. The new CEO is simply saying that those things will not be part of the culture going forward.

The anti-franchising stance may have been ideological but also practical. Remember that the first two areas that pursued this were Tyne and Wear, and Greater Manchester. The two urban areas where Stagecoach has some of their strongest and most lucrative operations. In Manchester, they had the most to lose in the old GMS business plus Wigan and Middleton. So it was always likely that they would be worse off simply as they had the most at risk, and despite Tranche 1 school wins and Tranche 2 success, they still might.

If it were your business that was under threat, would you sit idly on your hands and let it happen? If you would, I'd suggest business isn't something you're cut out for. It was that threat that generated the legal challenges and the other political posturing by Souter. Of course, the fact is that the world has changed, and it has ceased to be a threat. Franchising IS a reality so you have a choice... you can go into utter denial and cover your ears. Or you can accept that new reality and then make the best of it. By making the best of it, they might have a reduced profit stream but if it's 50% of what it was in Manchester, that's better than not accepting the reality of where they were in GM.

In addition, we have a bus industry impacted by the asteroid that was Covid. Passenger figures at 80% of 2019 figures is simply massive so they have to be pragmatic. Hence why they are busy hoovering up all sorts of additional work across the UK if only to improve the overhead recovery.

Aside from the political and cultural changes, I don't see any condemnation of previous business practices in her words so it's not disowning the past in that respect. It was a different world - the world and the rules have changed, and you have adapt or die.
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
7,382
Location
Elginshire
She is talking nonsense. She should just get on with the job. Hope she is not all talk and no action.
It very much sounds to me that she is getting on with the job, while acknowledging faux-pas of the past.

I well remember Souter's obnoxious attempts to retain "the clause" - Section 28 and Section 2a (the Scottish equivalent) and the poster campaign that went along with it. I had a friend whose kitchen window looked upon one of the billboards that was used to promote Souter's campaign, and as soon as the bill stickers had finished putting the posters up, he would go out and peel them off again because he considered it offensive. I recall that I once made a rather drunken attempt to do the same with another billboard but, unfortunately, the glue had set and I wasn't able to remove the entire poster! It happened at a time when we were making progress with LGBT rights (the QI+ thing wasn't quite acknowledged at that point). I certainly didn't share his views.


Stagecoach millionaire, Brian Souter, is to pay for a referendum in Scotland on the government's plans to scrap Section 28.
The Scottish Executive's decision to repeal the law which bans the promotion of homosexuality in schools, has been fiercely opposed by Mr Souter, who now says he will pay for an independent ballot of all Scottish households.

Writing in a Scottish newspaper which has backed his campaign, Mr Souter said he intended to put up £1m to pay for a postal ballot, to be conducted by the Electoral Reform Society.

Regarding his sister's (Ann Gloag's) "castle-grabbing" - she bought Kinfauns Castle near Perth and then sought to shut the land off to others. Unfortunately, she won the case.

One of Scotland's richest women has been awarded judicial expenses after winning a landmark court battle.
Last month, Ann Gloag became the first private individual to successfully argue right-to-roam legislation should not apply to her land.

The decision to prevent access around Kinfauns Castle near Perth had been challenged by the Ramblers' Association Scotland and Perth and Kinross Council.

They have now been ordered to pay the Stagecoach founder's legal costs.

The amount is understood to be about £200,000 and was awarded to Mrs Gloag by Sheriff Michael Fletcher, who sits at Perth Sheriff Court, and heard the original case.

Mrs Gloag, who is worth an estimated £395m, plans to donate her expenses to charity.
This flies in the face of the right-to-roam that we enjoy in Scotland - it's by no means the only case, though.

Gloag has also allegedly been involved in human trafficking:

Police investigating Stagecoach founder Dame Ann Gloag and others in connection with a probe into human trafficking allegations have submitted a report to prosecutors.

Four people were charged in January by Police Scotland.


At the time, a spokesperson for Dame Ann said she "strongly disputes the malicious allegations" made against her, her foundation and members of her family.

The force said on Wednesday that a report has now been sent to prosecutors. The Crown Office confirmed it had received the report.

A Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service spokesperson said: "Careful consideration is given to any reports of alleged criminal conduct which are submitted by the police, or any other specialist reporting agency, to the Procurator Fiscal.

"Criminal proceedings will be raised if such reports contain sufficient evidence and if it is appropriate and in the public interest to do so."

A spokeswoman for Dame Ann declined to comment on the latest development.

Is it really that surprising that the current management of the Stagecoach Group are keen to distance themselves from past activities?
 

37114

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2019
Messages
423
I wonder if Stagecoach will still getting "mates rates" from Alexander Dennis after this.....
Judging by recent purchases (lots of Volvo BZLs and a batch of Solos) the answer to that is no..
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,490
For a Shareholder as long as they win a franchise and priced it right then it is guaranteed income for 5+ years. She appears to be part of the new trend of bringing in non-bus people to run the company, not sure how well that has gone at First, but it means that the bus entrepreneur spirit that naturally opposes franchising isn't there.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
14,809
Location
Isle of Man
The “bus entrepreneur spirit” was always about ripping off passengers and ripping off the taxpayer. Not just Souter and Gloag, Lockhead was the same, so was Moyes.

And that “spirit” of grabbing every penny in dividends, leaving a trail of destruction in your wake and without investing anything back is why the bus industry is in such a poor state now.

The history of the bus industry has always been about privatising profit and nationalising risk. Stagecoach had the begging bowl out during Covid despite the billion or so the owners took out in dividends. I’d have honestly let them go bust.

I hope the industry is changing. It needs to.
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,767
The history of the bus industry has always been about privatising profit and nationalising risk. Stagecoach had the begging bowl out during Covid despite the billion or so the owners took out in dividends. I’d have honestly let them go bust.
Surely the risk in the deregulation era has been with the operators? What risks is the taxpayer exposed to when a commercial service is run? The profits are taxable, of course.

Would you really rather they had gone bust during the lockdowns and left people stranded?
For a Shareholder as long as they win a franchise and priced it right then it is guaranteed income for 5+ years
Exactly. The taxpayer is assuming the risk.
 

Megafuss

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
724
Location
Spalding
The “bus entrepreneur spirit” was always about ripping off passengers and ripping off the taxpayer. Not just Souter and Gloag, Lockhead was the same, so was Moyes.

And that “spirit” of grabbing every penny in dividends, leaving a trail of destruction in your wake and without investing anything back is why the bus industry is in such a poor state now.

The history of the bus industry has always been about privatising profit and nationalising risk. Stagecoach had the begging bowl out during Covid despite the billion or so the owners took out in dividends. I’d have honestly let them go bust.

I hope the industry is changing. It needs to.
That just isn't a serious statement.

CPT presented to the DfT the facts about what would happen if the industry didn't get the support to at least keep the show on the road. I can tell you with a very high degree of certainty that a number of operating companies would have went under in under 6 weeks if they did not get any help, even with support from owning groups. That would have been thousands of people on the dole at a time where there were no jobs.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
14,809
Location
Isle of Man
I can tell you with a very high degree of certainty that a number of operating companies would have went under in under 6 weeks if they did not get any help, even with support from owning groups
Of course they would have done. The owners took out the money during the fat years and were nowhere to be seen when the muck hit the fan. “Oh we’ll sack everyone if you don’t bail us out”. I’ve no doubt the likes of Gloag would have done too.

Stagecoach paid out well north of a billion quid to Souter and Gloag, but there was no money left when the going got tough. And you’re telling me that is NOT privatising profit and nationalising risk?

Would you really rather they had gone bust during the lockdowns and left people stranded?
The shareholders can invest some equity into their business. If they don’t, that’s their commercial decision to let their business fold. That’s how it works isn’t it?

Surely the risk in the deregulation era has been with the operators? What risks is the taxpayer exposed to when a commercial service is run?
No, the risk has been with the taxpayer. The operators take all that lovely profit from the lucrative commercial stuff- Stagecoach Busways’ profit margin was 23% in the early 2000s- and hand over everything else to the taxpayer to run. And, of course, there’s a guaranteed margin on the tendered stuff.

Commercial route failures don’t cost money, the registration timescale means there’s no risk and the taxpayer will pick up the tab for anything essential. The bus industry is about as risk-free as you can get, providing you reach a critical mass in an area.

Stagecoach Busways went through a phase of declaring early/late/estate services as uneconomic, and getting Nexus to tender them out. Oddly enough, when they didn’t win the tender for things like the daytime 32/A, they decided they were economic after all, and kept them. Yes, they’re just playing the game, but it shows the mentality we’re dealing with.

So they get to keep the profit on the fatty bits, and get to keep the profit on the thin bits. Nice work if you can get it.

Now I completely agree things aren’t as lucrative as they were back in the early 2000s, and Busways won’t be making 20%+ now- they’re making about half that. But that’s part of ebb and flow of business. And it’s alsoo rather telling that the companies are now talking more about “collaborative working” now the margins are thinner.
 
Last edited:

Megafuss

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
724
Location
Spalding
Of course they would have done. The owners took out the money during the fat years and were nowhere to be seen when the muck hit the fan. “Oh we’ll sack everyone if you don’t bail us out”. I’ve no doubt the likes of Gloag would have done too.

Stagecoach paid out well north of a billion quid to Souter and Gloag, but there was no money left when the going got tough. And you’re telling me that is NOT privatising profit and nationalising risk?



The shareholders can invest some equity into their business. If they don’t, that’s their commercial decision to let their business fold. That’s how it works isn’t it?


No, the risk has been with the taxpayer. The operators take all that lovely profit from the lucrative commercial stuff- Stagecoach Busways’ profit margin was 23% in the early 2000s- and hand over everything else to the taxpayer to run. And, of course, there’s a guaranteed margin on the tendered stuff.

Commercial route failures don’t cost money, the registration timescale means there’s no risk and the taxpayer will pick up the tab for anything essential. The bus industry is about as risk-free as you can get, providing you reach a critical mass in an area.

Stagecoach Busways went through a phase of declaring early/late/estate services as uneconomic, and getting Nexus to tender them out. Oddly enough, when they didn’t win the tender for things like the daytime 32/A, they decided they were economic after all, and kept them. Yes, they’re just playing the game, but it shows the mentality we’re dealing with.

So they get to keep the profit on the fatty bits, and get to keep the profit on the thin bits. Nice work if you can get it.

Now I completely agree things aren’t as lucrative as they were back in the early 2000s, and Busways won’t be making 20%+ now- they’re making about half that. But that’s part of ebb and flow of business. And it’s alsoo rather telling that the companies are now talking more about “collaborative working” now the margins are thinner.
That is simply untrue. I'm no fan of Souter on a personal level, but Stagecoach (and others) did everything they could to safeguard as much as possible as they needed something to build back from. It is also not unreasonable for any business that was dispositioned through no fault of its own to make use of the help available to it. There is no shame in that.

Maybe households should have rejected Furlough money as they don't look after their own finances?

It's also worth pointing out that Busways make a healthy profit as they actually run a decent service, and with very very few contracted miles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top