• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The last diesel locomotive....

Status
Not open for further replies.

Western 52

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2020
Messages
1,611
Location
Burry Port
What is likely to be the final class of straight diesel locomotive to run on the UK national network?

Excluding preserved locos and those that use hybrid technology, bimodes, trimodes, etc.

Class 68 maybe, or perhaps even an 08?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,250
Location
Bristol
08 or 66, I reckon. Probably 66 as dedicated shunting requirements steadily reduce.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,451
Location
Cambridge, UK
66 - some of them are less than 10 years old, there are hundreds of them in use and they are reliable.
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,825
Will never happen. There will always be a need for a few diesel locos, even after electrification spreads further. And batteries will never have sufficient capacity to work some of the heaviest / longest workings. The Class 66 successors, built 2045 onwards may last until about 2100.
 

tomc

New Member
Joined
7 Jan 2024
Messages
1
Location
UK
It might be a DMU. There's likely a passenger route that is never going to be electrified and will be run with cascaded diesels as electric and bi-mode stock displaces them from other routes. There's likely a stronger financial case for freight operators moving to bi-mode than there is for DfT eliminating diesels from passenger franchises.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,250
Location
Bristol
It might be a DMU. There's likely a passenger route that is never going to be electrified and will be run with cascaded diesels as electric and bi-mode stock displaces them from other routes. There's likely a stronger financial case for freight operators moving to bi-mode than there is for DfT eliminating diesels from passenger franchises.
I notice it's your first post, welcome!

Surely by definition the last Locomotive cannot be a Multiple Unit?
 

Western 52

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2020
Messages
1,611
Location
Burry Port
I notice it's your first post, welcome!

Surely by definition the last Locomotive cannot be a Multiple Unit?
Yes, I was interested mainly in locos for this thread. From replies so far, opinion is maybe the last diesel loco will be one of the final build 66s, although post #8 is interesting as I'd not considered the class 43s on the measurement train.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,250
Location
Bristol
Yes, I was interested mainly in locos for this thread. From replies so far, opinion is maybe the last diesel loco will be one of the final build 66s, although post #8 is interesting as I'd not considered the class 43s on the measurement train.
I suspect the Class 43 will be replaced before the 66 - the Measurement equipment could be refitted into a spare 80X. The key question will be maintaining a sufficiently large pool of locomotives for the final examples to draw spares from. Class 43s are already in that stage, and it will become increasingly uneconomic to maintain the final ones as the supply dwindles. Meanwhile there are loads of Class 66's, and they are still in full service so parts are unlikely to be an issue for a while.
The 37s have hung on because there were lots of them so spares could be banked up and they perform a specialised role that is harder for the 66s to replace them on (low RA).
 

Thornaby 37

Member
Joined
20 Nov 2023
Messages
98
Location
Bedford
Of the locomotive classes currently in existence, I would predict the 68s [unless they get converted into 88s sometime in the future]
 

randyrippley

Established Member
Joined
21 Feb 2016
Messages
5,383
To answer this properly you have to think in terms of what has the greatest repairability, both in terms of spares availability and simple basic robustness of design. In which case it has to be the 66, with its simple sole-bar modular design where bits can be easily swapped and replaced, and with large scale global availability of diesels and electricals. No messing around with monocoque or space-frame bodies making parts swapping difficult, or body repairs expensive. Broken bits can be just lifted off and replaced.
You should be able to get 40-50+ years out of the 66 fleet - as long as pollution regs don't stop them
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
15,250
Location
Bristol
Of the locomotive classes currently in existence, I would predict the 68s [unless they get converted into 88s sometime in the future]
68s are loud, a small class and don't meet current regulations. 66s will outlast all challengers.
 

172007

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
877
Location
West Mids
Probably class 69.

Same prime mover as class 66 everything is new other than refurbished frame, body and bogies (Alternators new?).

Still being built too.

Will never happen. There will always be a need for a few diesel locos, even after electrification spreads further. And batteries will never have sufficient capacity to work some of the heaviest / longest workings. The Class 66 successors, built 2045 onwards may last until about 2100.
That's a strong claim to say batteries will never have sufficient capacity. There must 100's of millions being spent annually on battery research and no one know what's around the corner.

The OP's question was Straight Diesal. I think it's battery cost and 20ft of space lost that inhibits a battery unit from being put into a 20ft container to power a Hybrid Diesal loco a fair old distance I immagne on an intermodal. The 20ft can also be swapped out for a fully charged one at the other end too easily.
 
Last edited:

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,825
Probably class 69.

Same prime mover as class 66 everything is new other than refurbished frame, body and bogies (Alternators new?).

Still being built too.


That's a strong claim to say batteries will never have sufficient capacity. There must 100's of millions being spent annually on battery research and no one know what's around the corner.

The OP's question was Straight Diesal. I think it's battery cost and 20ft of space lost that inhibits a battery unit from being put into a 20ft container to power a Hybrid Diesal loco a fair old distance I immagne on an intermodal. The 20ft can also be swapped out for a fully charged one at the other end too easily.
Battery capacity is limited by chemistry. We have not yet reached that limit, but once the limit due to chemistry has been reached, the only way to increase capacity will be to include more battery cells.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,857
Battery capacity is limited by chemistry. We have not yet reached that limit, but once the limit due to chemistry has been reached, the only way to increase capacity will be to include more battery cells.
Or find new technology.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,451
Location
Cambridge, UK
Probably class 69.

Same prime mover as class 66 everything is new other than refurbished frame, body and bogies (Alternators new?).

Still being built too.
The alternators are new (and AFAIK different to the cl. 66 alternator).

But as a small fleet, I doubt they will outlast the 66s.

Any bets on the class 59 lifetime (the original Foster Yeoman quartet are approaching 40 hard-working years old now)?
 

Technologist

Member
Joined
29 May 2018
Messages
239
Will never happen. There will always be a need for a few diesel locos, even after electrification spreads further. And batteries will never have sufficient capacity to work some of the heaviest / longest workings. The Class 66 successors, built 2045 onwards may last until about 2100.
This point always amuses me, railways are fabulously efficient, but batteries don't have enough capacity for rail vehicles despite it being possible to drive anywhere in the UK with an electric car!

Even with todays technology we could pack a 60 tonne freight wagon with 9MWhr of storage and plug it into the loco, just keep adding cars until you have enough range to get between electrification with whatever load you need to move. That 9 MWhr of battery pack would cost about $1 million at the prices that car makers currently pay.

The last steam locos were good to last to the 80/90's, it's perfectly feasible that everything diesel is gone in about 20 years, the government action is just to set a phase out date once options have been proven to be feasible.

Battery capacity is limited by chemistry. We have not yet reached that limit, but once the limit due to chemistry has been reached, the only way to increase capacity will be to include more battery cells.
1: As stated above you can get 9MWh onto a 60 tonne payload wagon with current 5,000 cycle LFP batteries used in value BEVs. Just add enough wagons until you have enough range, then look at a few places where you could install intermittent electrification cheaply and look at putting wires into certain destinations.
2: The chemistry limits for Lithium Sulphur are about 10X the energy density we currently have, however as I alluded to in point 1, trains care more about battery cost and cycle life than they do about energy density. There are no fundamental limitations on cycle life.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top