• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The train that killed the Honeybourne line

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robspur

Member
Joined
8 May 2022
Messages
12
Location
GL20 8PJ
Does anyone know the number of the Peak diesel which was hauling the coal train from Toton to Severn Tunnel Junction which had some of its trucks derail at the rear of the train at Winchcombe on 25th August 1976.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Ash Bridge

Established Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
4,154
Location
Stockport
Just found this old thread if of any help?

 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,372
Location
Devon
Just found this old thread if of any help?


45076 is mentioned in that thread. I wonder if our @Richard Scott might know if that’s correct?
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
10,911
Location
Up the creek
Wikipedia says 45149, although it does not give a source. However, this may come from a generic photo mentioned in a post related to aliens by GeekExchange on this forum on 11 September 2017. (This is not a joke.)
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
17,372
Location
Devon
Wikipedia says 45149, although it does not give a source. However, this may come from a generic photo mentioned in a post related to aliens by GeekExchange on this forum on 11 September 2017. (This is not a joke.)
45076 is the number I've heard quoted but never been confirmed.

Following on from the loco @Gloster mentioned above, 45149 is the Peak you’ve got up there Richard so I’d assume that you’d know if it was your one? :lol:
 

Richard Scott

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Railtours & Preservation
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
4,147
Following on from the loco @Gloster mentioned above, 45149 is the Peak you’ve got up there Richard so I’d assume that you’d know if it was your one? :lol:
The 45149 quote surfaced a couple of years back whereas 45076 goes back many years. Guessing someone got wires crossed and the rumour that it was 45149 then circulated.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
5,186
45076 and 45149 were adjacently numbered D134 and D135 - is that a coincidence? (I appreciate the accident was post-TOPS, it just seemed an oddity)
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,495
Location
Cambridge, UK
Given that 45149 was a '45/1' ETS fitted loco, primarily converted for and used on MML passenger services in the 70's, I would have thought it was a lot less likely to turn up on a coal train in Gloucestershire than a 45/0.
 

Richard Scott

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Railtours & Preservation
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
4,147
Given that 45149 was a '45/1' ETS fitted loco, primarily converted for and used on MML passenger services in the 70's, I would have thought it was a lot less likely to turn up on a coal train in Gloucestershire than a 45/0.
That was along lines of my thinking too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top