It seems to me that TfGM, Cheshire East and Warrington are all more concerned about services within their own boundaries than connectivity with the other authorities' areas. This parochial attitude is typified by the above TfGM and Cheshire East responses regarding the 37/37A - no consideration of the possibility that people might need to travel between Altrincham and Little Bollington or High Legh in the peak.
You might not be aware but there was a historic fall out between what was at the time Warrington Borough Transport and Cheshire County Council over the 47 route. It ran as 5 services per day each way between Lower Peover and Warrington but 2 additional services each way on Tuesdays and Fridays were subsided, Tuesday and Friday coincided with market days. Warrington BT said that revenue on the service had dropped and the subsidy needed reviewing. What then happened was Cheshire County Council put out a new tender for the 2 services on Tuesday and Friday only (with no Warrington Borugh Council contribution), awarded the contract to Tomlinson Travel and the rest of the 47 route went.
Last year Tomlinson Travel told Cheshire East council passenger numbers on the 47 route had dropped and they wanted out of the contract. Cheshire East council agreed to cancel it but didn't re-tender it. Warrington council then issued a tender for 2 Warrington-Lymm only return services on Tuesday and Fridays only and awarded it to Network Warrington. Now it looks like Cheshire East have agreed to subside an extension of that service back to High Legh.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Been reported on another forum that one day Warrington Coachways cancelled two consecutive services from Altrincham due to no bus available. Then the next service (for which a bus was available) was cancelled as the bus ran out of diesel.