• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ORR showing a lack of imagination regarding enabling WCML open access operations

Meole

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2018
Messages
596
Moderator note: Split from

The ORR shows a distinct lack of imagination in not considering the option of reducing the paths utilised by existing WCML operators to create the pathway for these new innovative services which would significantly enhance passenger experience through greater choice and pricing, too much political pressure perhaps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
25,412
Location
Bolton
The ORR shows a distinct lack of imagination in not considering the option of reducing the paths utilised by existing WCML operators to create the pathway for these new innovative services which would significantly enhance passenger experience through greater choice and pricing, too much political pressure perhaps.
How are you proposing getting them to give up their firm rights? The ORR can't just take them away because they feel like it...
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,449
The ORR shows a distinct lack of imagination in not considering the option of reducing the paths utilised by existing WCML operators to create the pathway for these new innovative services which would significantly enhance passenger experience through greater choice and pricing, too much political pressure perhaps.
Not ORR's bag I would suggest. Thats for the DfT to instruct 'Franchised' operators like Avanti to do to allow OA to gain access to the track.

It would be interesting to see if the OA operators could do better than the current mob. However if would have to be the OA's paying their correct share of the maintenance costs of the infrastructure they use rather than any other charge.

Maybe it would see (the limited) DfT funding diverted to other lines instead. (Not holding my breath though.
 

Top