Jamesrob637
Established Member
- Joined
- 12 Aug 2016
- Messages
- 5,642
ls Chiltern still the most "COVID" of all the operators with only 83% of pre-COVID services?
Last edited by a moderator:
There is variation between TOCs, and Chiltern are indeed at 83%, and are not the lowest. Plenty of others in the range 80-86%.
And yet many bemoan the fact that passenger numbers and revenue is still down compared to 2019 levels, despite the fact that in many cases, less trains are running. If we calculated passenger numbers in relation to service provision, no doubt ridership would be at 110-120% on many routes compared to 2019 figures.
Add to that list Hounslow loop services off peak completely withdrawn.SWR must be one of the lower ones. AFAIK, unless there have been recent improvements, off-peak to Reading is 50%, Guildford New Line routes off-peak are 50%, Portsmouth Direct off-peak is 67%. Most metro services are 8-coach vice 10 since the 456s went and 701s failed to arrive.
I think Manchester–Bristol's hourly but with a relatively early finish (last southbound leaves Manchester at 17:03) and I think the December 2019 timetable was those services carrying on to Exeter, which only one now and two from next month (both to Paignton) do. There's also seven Cambridge terminators, although Cambridge–Stansted's not a massive part of the XC network.XC must be considerably down, with them only running 4 Newcastle-Reading services and another 3 terminating at York from December 2023, as well as some Manchester-Bristol services.
I think Manchester–Bristol's hourly but with a relatively early finish (last southbound leaves Manchester at 17:03) and I think the December 2019 timetable was those services carrying on to Exeter, which only one now and two from next month (both to Paignton) do. There's also seven Cambridge terminators, although Cambridge–Stansted's not a massive part of the XC network.
I think Manchester–Bristol's hourly but with a relatively early finish (last southbound leaves Manchester at 17:03) and I think the December 2019 timetable was those services carrying on to Exeter, which only one now and two from next month (both to Paignton) do. There's also seven Cambridge terminators, although Cambridge–Stansted's not a massive part of the XC network.
In the case of the NSE area, that's possibly true. At Avanti and TPE on the other hand the timetable is being cut to reflect the ability (or lack of) to deliver the service. Demand is being artificially suppressed here.Or you could argue that train service provision is matching demand.
ScotRail was my first thought too - reduced E-G service was an obvious one but a few others - Cathcart Circle (which will finally be reinstated next month!) has been missing along with some semi fast Ayr services IIRC. I'm sure there's several other lines still below pre-covid frequency.Scotrail certainly. Glasgow to Edinburgh via Falkirk High is every 30 nins off peak. Hourly evening service to East Kilbride. The fast Shotts service has never returned.
Cross country has not returned to every 2 hours to Glasgow and TPE is still lacking in a few services to Liverpool.
Plus the Dorking and Guildford via Epsom still both only hourly as opposed to every 30 mins pre-pandemicAdd to that list Hounslow loop services off peak completely withdrawn.
I cant speak for percentages but this is what its like service wise. Going off Marylebone departures off peak.ls Chiltern still the most "COVID" of all the operators with only 83% of pre-COVID services?
Mainline services:SWR must be one of the lower ones. AFAIK, unless there have been recent improvements, off-peak to Reading is 50%, Guildford New Line routes off-peak are 50%, Portsmouth Direct off-peak is 67%. Most metro services are 8-coach vice 10 since the 456s went and 701s failed to arrive.
Waterloo - Reading pre-Covid was 4tph for several hours across both peaks, plus latterly Windsor had some additional peak services.Mainline services:
London - Weymouth 2 tph: full service
London - Poole slow service 1 tph: truncated to start at Winchester
London - Portsmouth via Eastleigh 1 tph: full service
London - Portsmouth direct 3 tph: become 2 tph
London - Haslemere 1 tph: full service
London - Exeter 1 tph: full service
London - Salisbury 1 tph: truncated to start at Basingstoke
London - Alton 2 tph: full service
London - Basingstoke 2 tph: full service
Total: 14 tph has now become 11 tph.
Suburban services (via Wimbledon):
London - Chessington 2 tph: full service
London - Dorking 2 tph: become 1 tph
London - Guildford (via Epsom) 2 tph: become 1 tph
London - Guildford (via Cobham) 2 tph: full service
London - Woking 2 tph: full service
London - Hampton Court 2 tph: full service
London - Shepperton 2 tph: full service
London - Wimbledon - Strawberry Hill - Richmond - London 2 tph: full service
Total: 14 tph has now become 12 tph.
Suburban services (via Richmond):
London - Reading 2 tph: full service
London - Windsor 2 tph: full service
London - Richmond - Strawberry Hill - Wimbledon - London 2 tph: full service
London - Richmond - Hounslow - London 2 tph: GONE off-peak
Total: 8 tph has now become 6 tph.
Suburban services (via Hounslow):
London - Hounslow - Staines - Weybridge 2 tph: full service
London - Hounslow - Richmond - London 2 tph: GONE off-peak
Total: 4 tph has now become 2 tph, which renders the line now useless.
Southern cuts which I am aware of:
Victoria - Epsom 2 tph has been merged with Victoria - Dorking 2 tph by running them all slow, which means 4 tph between Victoria - Epsom has become 2.
Victoria - Norbury - Sutton 2 tph off-peak has gone with only the Epsom Downs services still operating, which means 4 tph has become 2.
London Bridge - Sydenham - East Croydon - Coulsdon Town 2 tph: gone
London Bridge - Tulse Hill - East Croydon - Caterham 2 tph: gone
Brighton - Worthing 2 tph: gone
What were the 6 tph composed of? I have got the map showing the December 2019 service pattern, which only showed 4 tph, consisting of 2 Weybridge services and 2 loop services in each direction.In the Hounslow loop also gone is the anticlockwise service off peak. So actually down from 6tph to 2tph. As you say, useless for such a populated urban corridor.
It's good for anyone that doesn't travel through Shotts I guess. I'm guessing that the times either end are still the old 156 times and the EMUs run faster, hence the longer dwell in the middle?The fast Shotts service is coming back from December (although the 8 minute dwells at Shotts do negate most of the benefits of running fast!). How feasible would it be for ScotRail to re-instate any of their remaining lost frequencies? They should certainly have enough EMUs but do they have enough people trained? It certainly seems like services are getting busier so I would think there's the demmand to be running the remaining services.
I've noticed that Shrub Hill services have suffered particularly because of this... only 1 morning peak service into New Street which is regularly taking on a lot passengers from New street. Changes to the Evening peak trains mean that none of these who travelled from Shrub Hill in the morning can get back there in the evenings.. Most trains continue straight through to Foregate Street until nearly 6pmWest Mids are still down with only 4 ph on the cross city & Snow Hill Lines & Services still missing on both the Hereford & Shrewsbury lines.
Whilst passenger numbers are growing again I can’t see any changes until the Camp Hill line opens.
One of the reasons for not re introducing services as been down to traction training taking place with Worcester,Shrewsbury,Wolves,Leamington & 1 link at New St & Coventry learning 196’s add to that all the depots with electric work will start or have just started learning 730’s which will take 12 months to complete,maybe longer.
Given the ongoing driver shortages on top with many depots having new drivers waiting to resume training post Covid & some legacy training to do (company working flat out to get both done as well as the above traction training). As you can imagine only a certain amount of instructors can be out/detached at any one time whilst trying to run a service & stop them literally falling over each other to use the same resources etc.
The aim is to restore services in the coming years as requested by Transport for the West Mids whilst at the same time having the dft knocking on the door to reduce services/train lengths/costs etc across the whole rail network & threatened cuts to funding doesn’t help.