• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

The Olympics

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,066
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Just think how much the French will be pleased now NOT to have these games over there , as Al Quaeda in the Islamic Maghreb will not have any prestigious sporting events to target in France on behalf of the French immigrant North African population. No extra costs for France for hosting these games at a time when the Eurozone is at its most fragile and all their budgetary frailties are beginning to surface.
 

steamybrian

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2010
Messages
1,867
Location
Kent
My photograph (hopefully attached) shows the Olympic Torch on the A26 at Tunbridge Wells today passing under the Spa Valley Railway with Jinty 47493 parked on the bridge.
I wonder how many other preserved railways the torch passed under or over. I am aware that the Severn Valley Railway was involved several weeks ago.
 

Attachments

  • Olympic Torch  on A26- 170712 002.JPG
    Olympic Torch on A26- 170712 002.JPG
    311.9 KB · Views: 18

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
So if you had not had sponsors the public purse would have had to cough up a few more Billion - would you rather have these restrictions or heavier Government contributions.

Sponsorship has raised £700m a not insignificant sum but not "a few more billion".
http://www.london2012.com/about-us/the-people-delivering-the-games/locog/

I would prefer it to come from the public purse than to save such draconian restrictions on something as basic as food. Does anyone else remember the farce regarding coca cola's attempt to introduce "mineral" water?
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
6,878
Location
UK
Maybe we could give everyone blue, red and white shirts. Then when they sit down they form a massive pepsi logo :) Nothing against that :)
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,584
Location
Stirlingshire

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
I wonder if people would be this fussed about sponsorship if it was a footballing event. They generally have the same close guarded rules regarding sponsorship in and around the grounds.
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,146
Location
Yorkshire
I wonder if people would be this fussed about sponsorship if it was a footballing event. They generally have the same close guarded rules regarding sponsorship in and around the grounds.

I'm not impressed with that either - Brazil have had to change their laws on alcohol at football stadia to be allowed to host the Football World Cup because there's an official beer.

Though nowhere's enacted such draconian legislation as have been for the Olympics.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Is "Brazil 2014" a protected game mark? "London 2012" is.

I dont know as its not marketed as Brazil 2014 but 'The FIFA World Cup Brazil 2014' more then likely is a protected game mark given it has FIFA in the title and that is how the world cup is marketed.
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
It's mainly the feeling that we're being told that we are somehow inferior for not liking it, that no mainstream media accepts the opinion that people are not looking forward to it. Add on sponsorship rules largely inconsistent with a free society and the whole thing smacks of a tournament for the sponsors instead of for the athletes.
 

Johnuk123

Established Member
Joined
19 Mar 2012
Messages
2,801
What gets me is you get people like Kelly Holmes constantly on the t.v. telling everybody that childrens lives are going to be changed.

A running and jumping competititon that lasts a fortnight will not make kids give up Facebook and computers and get down the park.

The ones that might be slightly interested will be the ones that already are.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,066
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
A running and jumping competition that lasts a fortnight will not make kids give up Facebook and computers and get down the park.

Since the mid-1970's, we have had various Governments of all shades and persuasions, who all talked incessantly about children eating the "right" type of foods and keeping fit, but in that same time period, how many school playing fields were sold off ?


--- old post above --- --- new post below ---


A report on the late night news tonight refers to a threatened disruption by members of the PCS union, who are in the Border Control area amongst others, as a result of a ballot for industrial action that very strangely will take affect in the period of the Olympic Games, even though there was only a 20% turn-out in the ballot. Will this lead to other unions "jumping on the same bandwagon of disruption" ?

Keep it all piling on, I say, as the more disruption there is, the less chance that Britain will ever be "saddled" with this type of event ever again. It is obvious that Britain should never have been considered to host this particular event in the first place.
 
Last edited:

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Several Chinese athletes after experiencing a couple of days of London weather have relocated their training camp from Tottenham to Germany. They claim to have experienced breathing problems from the cold and the wet.
 
Joined
1 Apr 2012
Messages
426
Location
Leeds
Several Chinese athletes after experiencing a couple of days of London weather have relocated their training camp from Tottenham to Germany. They claim to have experienced breathing problems from the cold and the wet.

That's bizarre!!:shock: What will happen (when they're actually performing) if it rains and is cold in London?:o
 
Joined
1 Apr 2012
Messages
426
Location
Leeds
What do you mean if.......:lol:

Probably heard what happened in Tottenham last August :oops:

Relocating (for training purposes) from Tottenham to Germany is bizarre. How about acclimatizing to the harsh and unforgiving British climate:lol:? Get used to it I say:roll:
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Keep it all piling on, I say, as the more disruption there is, the less chance that Britain will ever be "saddled" with this type of event ever again. It is obvious that Britain should never have been considered to host this particular event in the first place.

And why?

Because the British people themselves as a whole are pretty inept at doing anything but moaning and trying to bring misery to something that should be a joy and is a joy to millions of people?

We are as well placed as anyone to host sporting events. And I need to remind you all once again, this is not the 'Britsih' nor 'English' Olympic games.

This is the LONDON Olympic games 2012. Amazing how some of you seem to forget this.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,066
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
We are as well placed as anyone to host sporting events. And I need to remind you all once again, this is not the 'Britsih' nor 'English' Olympic games.

This is the LONDON Olympic games 2012. Amazing how some of you seem to forget this.


Silly of me to imagine that London is part of Britain or England, as you are at pains to point out above.....my apologies..:roll:

Perhaps I should have been more attentive in Geography classes 50 years ago. Incidentally, how long has LONDON been on the South Coast as there seems to be a scurrillous rumour doing the rounds that the LONDON Olympic Games 2012 sailing events are being held in Weymouth Bay and Portland Harbour. Perhaps someone should have a quiet word in the ear of Lord Coe about this geographical oversight and have these sailing events transferred to the river Fleet.....:roll:
 
Last edited:

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
Silly of me to imagine that London is part of Britain or England, as you point out above.....my apologies..:roll:

Perhaps I should have been more attentive in Geography classes 50 years ago.

Its got nothing to do with the country or island the games are on. Its all and ONLY about the city they are in. Once you get past that concept its pretty straightforward

Did you call them the 'Chinese' 'Australian' and so on and so forth Olympics previously? I very much doubt you or anyone else ever did.

In essence the Olympics have nowt to do with the rest of the country because it was the bid for London that won them just like Machesters bid for the 2000 Olympics had nowt to do with any other part of the country or island either.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
34,066
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Its got nothing to do with the country or island the games are on. Its all and ONLY about the city they are in. Once you get past that concept its pretty straightforward

If this "highlighted" part above is true, why did you not agree with me that both Weymouth Bay or Portland Harbour are most definately NOT part of LONDON as defined by you. As you say, I do find it hard to get past that particular version of the geography of LONDON.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Also, harking back to the LONDON emphasis, why were G4S asked to supply security personnel to MANCHESTER area establishments for the LONDON games.
 
Last edited:

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,822
If this "highlighted" part above is true, why did you not agree with me that both Weymouth Bay or Portland Harbour are most definately NOT part of LONDON as defined by you. As you say, I do find it hard to get past that particular version of the geography of LONDON.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Also, harking back to the LONDON emphasis, why were G4S asked to supply security personnel to MANCHESTER area establishments for the LONDON games.

Hard to do sailing events in the Thames. But part of the legacy was that they would put some events to other parts of the country like sailing and the football.

So are you now saying with your hand on your heart that what is actually happenning is the BRITISH OLYMPICC GAMES 2012? Or even the english or welsh or scottish or northern irish?

No, they are the london games, won by a bid put in by London along with the help of others from government and sports stars to try and get one if not the biggest sporting event to London. The same as people done for Manchester. But they would not have been called anything other then Manchester 2000 if they had of won then.And they wouldve had sailing somewhere else too as the canals are not big enough.

If you are going to get picky about the sailing and such like could you point to where it is the Portland & Weymouth 2012 sailing Olympic games? Or is it London 2012 sailing @ Portland & Weymouth? http://www.london2012.com/sailing/

Or what about the London 2012 Olympic football event? Is that branded as anything other than London 2012? http://www.london2012.com/football/

Try not to twist what I am saying nor what is billed as anything else because even a man of your intelligence knows that it is nothing other than London 2012.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I guess really it is just peoples nature to nit pick at every negative about things that try to go on in this country from HS2 to new airports and the Olympics,though obviously trains will get defended on a rail forum but its still the same thing.

Have we as a nation really lowered ourselves from revelling in things that are good for the country to a bunch of negative moany old soaks?

This really is my last input on the Olympics as it makes me sad to see peoples negativity surrounding this event.
 

heart-of-wessex

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Messages
3,040
Location
Trowbridge
I don't mind it if it's going to help us financially, but I am going to be pretty peeved off if the Government says we are now worst off after the Olympics....excuse me? Worst off? Why pay for a stadium then when we are already trillions in debt!

Also last night on the news, I see the opening ceremony will be cut by 30 minutes to allow people to get home after the event at 0230am (why is the ceremony at night?) but either case, this has apparently ****ed some people off who had a display for the ceremony, who are now told they can't do it.

He said 'to get people back to the city' so then I guess night 'N' buses are stopped then and I must have dreamt the 24 hour Javelin service running to/from Stratford...?
 

Deerfold

Veteran Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
13,146
Location
Yorkshire
He said 'to get people back to the city' so then I guess night 'N' buses are stopped then and I must have dreamt the 24 hour Javelin service running to/from Stratford...?

I doubt either of these could cope with everyone from the Olympic Stadium if there were no tubes - which will finish around 0230 that night - even with the improved frequencies on late evening and night services around the Olympic Park.
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
I don't mind it if it's going to help us financially, but I am going to be pretty peeved off if the Government says we are now worst off after the Olympics....excuse me? Worst off? Why pay for a stadium then when we are already trillions in debt!...
Remember that the commitments to the whole thing were made when the official line was that the economy was thriving (delusional, of course). It would surely have done irreparable damage to Britain's reputation to have cancelled the event in 2010 (when the realists took over). I am sure that there will be a plethora of different assessments of the overall benefits to the country afterwards, with politicians of all sides claiming the bits they did have benefited everyone, while the bits the others were responsible for have plunged us into a new dark age.
Me? I shudder to think what everyone is going to have to find to talk (moan?) about once the Games are done and dusted.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
29,107
Location
Redcar
Why pay for a stadium then when we are already trillions in debt!

Because when we agreed to do the games we weren't in the middle of the biggest recession since the 1930s? People go on about how the games are a waste of money when we're in a time of belt tightening but that's clouded totally by the advantage of hindsight. Back in 2005 it would have been very hard to predict that the economic situation of 2012 would have been as bad as it is.

(why is the ceremony at night?)

Probably to try and get it to fit in at time where it's at a reasonable hour for the international TV/radio/internet market. It isn't just people in the UK that will be watching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top