• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Are Voyagers really that bad?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
29 May 2013
Messages
186
Location
Derby
I was thinking, and though I'm not a fan of them, are Voyagers really that bad? Sure the toilets smell and take up too much space, and the seats aren't exactly well padded, but they're still 125mph express trains that do their job and often do it okay.

Thoughts?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,676
Location
Milton Keynes
in recent experience, the vestibules do not appear to have air conditioning and if the door into the seated area is not closing this heats up the carriage. Not nice in the current weather. This has happened to me twice this week. First time I moved coach but second time the train was busy.

Usually the Virgin ones are not bad, especially coach D if it's not in use for first class. Shop is too small otherwise not too bad
 

Squaddie

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2009
Messages
1,072
Location
London
I was thinking, and though I'm not a fan of them, are Voyagers really that bad? Sure the toilets smell and take up too much space, and the seats aren't exactly well padded, but they're still 125mph express trains that do their job and often do it okay.

Thoughts?
Voyagers are grim. Even in first class, the seats don't line up with the windows; in standard, they're too small, uncomfortable and sometimes have nothing but a blank wall next to them. I will not make a journey by train if the diagrammed rolling stock is a Voyager.

But if your only criteria is that they go at 125mph then I guess they're fine.
 
Joined
29 May 2013
Messages
186
Location
Derby
I agree with the fact seat/window alignment isn't great with there being huge gaps between each window but if you're going on a short hop between Derby and Tamworth or something, is it really that bad? When travelling first class, I've never had a huge problem. That said, I've always reserved a seat with Virgin. While we're on complaints though, they're a bit cramped compared to Meridians. Though personally I'd prefer a 222, 180 or HST to a Voyager, they're not all that bad!
 

Manchester77

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2012
Messages
2,628
Location
Manchester
222 is a voyager!!

They're not actually that bad. On a modern journey have a look round, most people are on their phone, reading, doing work, on a tablet etc there aren't many people just staring out the window. People go on about the engine noise, have they ever been on a 150 when the engine is used you can't hear the person next to you. People go on about how the seats don't line up, they don't on mark IIIs!! They're really not that bad. As has been said on other threads really if they were 7/8 coaches long most people would stop winging because there'd be less overcrowding. I'm not saying that they're the best train but they aren't that bad
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,573
Location
Yorks
They do suffer somewhat from being in competition with the 125's, which (apart from the removal of a few too many toilets) have been refurbed to produce a rather nicer and more spatious travelling environment.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,898
Location
Redcar
People go on about the engine noise, have they ever been on a 150 when the engine is used you can't hear the person next to you.

Very poor comparison really.

Although there are some lengthy 150 diagrams out there, it's chalk and cheese when comparing the two.
 

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,368
222 is a voyager!!

They're not actually that bad. On a modern journey have a look round, most people are on their phone, reading, doing work, on a tablet etc there aren't many people just staring out the window. People go on about the engine noise, have they ever been on a 150 when the engine is used you can't hear the person next to you. People go on about how the seats don't line up, they don't on mark IIIs!! They're really not that bad. As has been said on other threads really if they were 7/8 coaches long most people would stop winging because there'd be less overcrowding. I'm not saying that they're the best train but they aren't that bad


This is the main complaint I have with the Voyager, they are simply not long enough to cope with demand. In addition I'm not too keen on having engines mounted underneath the carriage which can make for an unpleasant ride, but I can live with that. But in short, an extra carriage or two and an internal refurbishment you would find most people wouldn't grumble about them as much as they do now.
 
Last edited:

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
Looking at the XC seating plan it looks like replacing the 'universal toilets' with 'standard toilets' in coaches B & C (and adding an extra luggage rack) would enable you to fit another dozen seats onto a 5-car unit.

Making the layout consistent between coaches (and perhaps restoring the shop/buffet) would make a very nice train.

The problem is the number of 4-car units - when perhaps they should all be 6-car...
 

cj_1985

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
741
I don't think that they are as bad as some people make them out to be...

I genuinely believe that part of the dislike/hatred of them by older enthusiasts is because they displaced mk2 and mk3 stock and the class 47 and 86s.

I find them to be quite comfortable... that being said I find the seating on Mk3 and mk4 stock to be too padded meaning a lack of support for my lower back which leads to me suffering pain when getting up out of my seat on a mk3 or 4. This issue actually led me to intentionally miss a service formed of mk2 stock on XC in order to travel on the more comfortable voyager service that departed 30 minutes-ish later.

visibility isn't a big issue for me.. as I have found that even sitting next to the window pillars you can still see enough of the scenery through the ends of the windows either side of the pillars. Aside from that I listen to music and read when travelling anyway so even if I had no view whatsoever, it wouldn't really affect my trip or enjoyment of it.

And finally as for the under carriage engine... again, they have never bothered me... I found the noise rather soothing in a way... but then I've been used to engine noise and vibration from underneath whatever iv travelled on ever since I was old enough to walk... it no different to traveling ion older buses or any coach... or from my experience travelling in truck cabs
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
If they'd been delivered as 6 car (with SDO) (and then lengthened to 7 or 8 throughout) with only two "accesible" loos (1st and standard) (the rest "normal" loos) they'd be outstanding. Especially if they were all tilting with enough of the XC network upgraded to make use of it.
 

All Line Rover

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2011
Messages
5,263
Virgin Voyagers are really quite good. Coach D has plenty of spacious tables, each perfectly lined up with a large window giving a wonderful view, with comfortable padded seats that all have a generous amount of legroom. I think Coach D is actually better than Coach E (First Class) because fewer of the seats in First Class line up with windows, making it feel plasticky and claustrophobic.

If only every coach, on every Voyager, was reconfigured to be like Coach D. A few seats would be lost because of the more spacious layout, but I genuinely believe Voyagers would become one of the best trains on the network, trumping 175s (currently the most spacious interior layout of any train, IMO) and the supposedly 'amazing' Pendolinos.
 
Last edited:

Drsatan

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
1,887
Location
Land of the Sprinters
If they'd been delivered as 6 car (with SDO) (and then lengthened to 7 or 8 throughout) with only two "accesible" loos (1st and standard) (the rest "normal" loos) they'd be outstanding. Especially if they were all tilting with enough of the XC network upgraded to make use of it.

I think you'd need to carry out a lot more work to Voyagers to make them 'outstanding' like replacing the seat cushions with softer ones, tweaking the seat alignments, getting rid of the smell from the toilets, and giving them a good clean.

Unfortunately, there are some journeys for which it is difficult to avoid using a Voyager such as Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads or stations beyond.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I've not travelled on them often, but I don't remember any toilet smell when I used them, perhaps I got lucky. Underfloor engines are never going to make for as good a travel experience as locos at either end or electric traction - it doesn't bother me too much, but on a very long cross country journey of 5+ hours I'd imagine it gets tedious, no moreso than a coach journey though. Whatever you say about the comparison to a 150, they are at least far more refined to travel in so some sort of effort has been made.
Agreed on the short length, but if capacity is an issue, surely more should have just been ordered, and two units coupled together? 8 car length trains aren't too much of a problem nationally are they?
 

gordonthemoron

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2006
Messages
6,676
Location
Milton Keynes
the toilet smell is usually in the toilet itself, with some residue in the vestibule. However, if the door to the seated section is stuck open, the smell travels.
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
No. And the main gripes with them could easily be sorted out by a decent refurbishment

So in other words you are admitting they are that bad. You say they arent, but then mention a decent refurb. If they werent that bad, they wouldnt need a decent refurb. Just a deep clean now and again.
Its like saying a Pacer isnt that bad. Most of the gripes with them could be sorted with a decent refurb.

Yes, a decent refurb is definitely needed with the voyagers. Take the interior right back to bare metal, and start again. Also divert the exhaust pipes, and move them away from where the toilets are going to be.
They could then be decent enough for perhaps long distance services within Scotland. Perhaps local Cornish stoppers on the mainline as well. If you want to keep them where they are, im afraid the refurb will need to be even more drastic. It involves removing the engines.
So yes, most of the problems could be sorted with a very decent refurb.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
the toilet smell is usually in the toilet itself, with some residue in the vestibule. However, if the door to the seated section is stuck open, the smell travels.

It depends if you recognise the toilet smell, and also how frequently you travel on them sometimes. If you are a frequent traveller, the smell just becomes the smell of the train. However if you arent used to them, then the pong in the saloon definitely hits you as you step onboard. Its totally different to any other train.
Obviously yes, its worse the closer to the toilets you are, but there is always that faint smell all round the unit.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
, but on a very long cross country journey of 5+ hours I'd imagine it gets tedious, no moreso than a coach journey though.

A coach is quieter than a voyager. In fact most coaches nowadays arent too bad. Although legroom can be poor, they are usually fairly quiet.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Unfortunately, there are some journeys for which it is difficult to avoid using a Voyager such as Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads or stations beyond.

Thankfully I can avoid the things. Yes, if im on a Rover, a short hop on a voyager is sometimes very handy, but its never desired.
If I was ever needing to do a journey where a voyager couldnt be avoided, then I would be using the car. If i never had the car on me, id never be putting myself in the position where i needed to do a long journey on one.

Once upon a time i didnt need to think about how id get from A to B. Now I do need to think about it. A crying shame when a couple of types of train can actually do that.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,052
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Which would you prefer on a Preston-Edinburgh journey? Voyager 221 or Desiro 185?
Or (coming soon) Desiro 350?
Pendolino 390s also work a minority of trains on the route.
HSTs don't come into it.

My order of preference would be 390/221/350/185.
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
808
Which would you prefer on a Preston-Edinburgh journey? Voyager 221 or Desiro 185?
Or (coming soon) Desiro 350?
Pendolino 390s also work a minority of trains on the route.
HSTs don't come into it.

My order of preference would be 390/221/350/185.

Exactly the opposite of mine then!
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
So in other words you are admitting they are that bad..
I think you're read far too much into what I actually wrote.

There are a few things that have been learned from experience. (For example; I've never travelled on a Meridian, but I've noted some people on here who are critical of Voyagers have nice things to say about Meridians.)

I went on (in a later post) to explain what some of those improvements would be; such as removing two of the 'universal toilets' and replacing them with standard toilets - I put that in the learning from experience category.

The only thing I'd count as a major design flaw is the smell problem. And that's what the refurb would/should be fixing.
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Which would you prefer on a Preston-Edinburgh journey? Voyager 221 or Desiro 185?
Or (coming soon) Desiro 350?
Pendolino 390s also work a minority of trains on the route.
HSTs don't come into it.

My order of preference would be 390/221/350/185.

My preference- Northern 158 to York, then EC to Edinburgh. I would never ever go Preston to Edinburgh up the West Coast anymore.

Out of your options though. If at a weekend, then a bendy pendy, and upgrade to 1st class, or if not at a weekend, then probably a 350 (assuming they are more comfortable than LMs versions). I wouldnt do it during the week though. As i said, id go via York.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
The only thing I'd count as a major design flaw is the smell problem. And that's what the refurb would/should be fixing.

Crikey, you are being nice to them!

My list is so big it requires going back to bare metal.
New seats and carpet. Different type and colour
New overhead racks that dont have such a narrow entrance at the lip, and are of a different colour and shape
Different colour walls and lighting/ AC duct.
Getting rid of that annoying bleeping alarm
Scrapping the tacky plastic baggage racks at ends of coaches. Want something that actually looks decent.
Then when everything is put back together, it needs to be put together a lot better. No annoying vibrations everywhere (although you may struggle considering you have 750 annoying horses underneath you).
A totally different coach layout

Also finally diverting the exhausts away from the toilets if at all possible (if that isnt possible, then may as well send the units to Booths.) Id happily start that process rolling!!
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
....
If I was ever needing to do a journey where a voyager couldnt be avoided, then I would be using the car. If i never had the car on me, id never be putting myself in the position where i needed to do a long journey on one. ....

....
My list is so big it requires going back to bare metal.
New seats and carpet. Different type and colour
New overhead racks that dont have such a narrow entrance at the lip, and are of a different colour and shape
Different colour walls and lighting/ AC duct.
Getting rid of that annoying bleeping alarm
Scrapping the tacky plastic baggage racks at ends of coaches. Want something that actually looks decent.
Then when everything is put back together, it needs to be put together a lot better. No annoying vibrations everywhere (although you may struggle considering you have 750 annoying horses underneath you).
A totally different coach layout...
Considering your list of improvements applies mutatis mutandis to just about every car I have been in, you must have a pretty expensive car.:lol:
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Considering your list of improvements applies mutatis mutandis to just about every car I have been in, you must have a pretty expensive car.:lol:

No annoying beeps in my car. More comfortable seat. The boot provides more space for baggage. No vibrations in my car. Much more pleasant interior full stop. Yes its a much darker interior, but it isnt tacky, and is a pleasant environment, unlike the voyager. Engine noise from my car is less than a voyager. Road noise is annoying, but no more so than the lightweight bogies of a voyager (220 only) knocking into every nook and cranny going. Wind noise is worse in the car, but thats about it. Plus thankfully my car doesnt have that revolting smell.

Dont think any of my complaints apply to my car, and it isnt expensive.
Admittedly having cruise control makes motorway driving so much better. Couldnt do the long distances i do without cruise control.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
41,573
Location
Yorks
To be fair, softer cushions would improve a lot of trains, including Voyagers.
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Most of those are merely personal preferences about colour, etc - not major design flaws...

Even if you didnt change colours, most of my list still applies. New seats, new overhead racks, less vibrations, no revolting smells, brand new layout.
The other thing i never mentioned before, is changing the lightweight bogies on the 220s to normal bogies.

Also, it doesnt need to be a design flaw to make a train awful. But the voyagers have more design flaws and annoyances, and bad interior design than virtually anything else.
All of the above now, are pretty much all design flaws. Thats a hell of a lot, and I havent even mentioned the annoying engines, which we should have on such trains.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
To be fair, softer cushions would improve a lot of trains, including Voyagers.

That is very true. The annoying thing is, half of the design flaws on the voagers, are simple things. Different seats and luggage racks would go quite a way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top