There have been plenty of discussions about this in the past. The train companies believe that a national railcard would cannibalise revenues (and they are probably right). It is a wonder that the Network Railcard survives still (and that the minimum fare hasn't increased to £15 or even £20 yet).
Worth pointing out that 70% of tickets sold today are ones that are in fact discounted in one form or another.
How that's worked out? Is an Anytime Return classed as discounted because it's cheaper than two singles?
This seems a good enough point.Bolton News said:The Government lumped together all the least profitable parts of the network under one franchise and then expressed surprise that it doesn’t make money. What were they expecting?
It's always about "value for money" and "the taxpayer" with them isn't it? Yet "the taxpayer" isn't going to notice any difference in the tax they pay and the passengers affected certainly aren't getting improved value for money.DaFT said:A Department of Transport spokesman said: “These changes will help us achieve our long-term economic plan of building a rail network that provides the best possible value for money for the taxpayer.
If it's not been stated already the ECD or cheap evening return is also being withdrawn.
What they mean is non-passenger taxpayers, ie what they really care about is it's better for car drivers. That's in line with Government pro-car/anti-rail policy. However I suggest we keep this thread to the specifics of the restrictions (including the impact of them) and create a new thread to discuss the policies that have led to the decisions.It's always about "value for money" and "the taxpayer" with them isn't it? Yet "the taxpayer" isn't going to notice any difference in the tax they pay and the passengers affected certainly aren't getting improved value for money.
What they mean is non-passenger taxpayers, ie what they really care about is it's better for car drivers. That's in line with Government pro-car/anti-rail policy. However I suggest we keep this thread to the specifics of the restrictions (including the impact of them) and create a new thread to discuss the policies that have led to the decisions.
Perhaps someone could include that question as part of an FOI request?Of course, didn't realise I was going OT.
In the meantime, are the discussions that led to the changes going to be ongoing, and if so, is there room for review (and possible alteration/partial withdrawal) of the new restrictions after a given period of time?
So presumably this would mean off-peak tickets cannot be used on the 1829 MAN - MIA.Restriction ND said:Restriction : ND
OUTWARD TRAVEL
Valid on trains timed to depart between 0930 - 1600 inc and from 1830 onwards.
RETURN TRAVEL
Any train the same day except those timed to depart between 1601 - 1829 inc
I see problems occurring where the WTT and public timetables differ on the actual departure time of the train.
So presumably this would mean off-peak tickets cannot be used on the 1829 MAN - MIA.
However the working timetable at Network Rail shows 1M90 as actually departing at 1830. So which is it to be?
From the article:
This seems a good enough point.
It's always about "value for money" and "the taxpayer" with them isn't it? Yet "the taxpayer" isn't going to notice any difference in the tax they pay and the passengers affected certainly aren't getting improved value for money.
It's always about "value for money" and "the taxpayer" with them isn't it? Yet "the taxpayer" isn't going to notice any difference in the tax they pay and the passengers affected certainly aren't getting improved value for money.
I note that it will now be cheaper to travel into Manchester, in the evening peak, on a return ticket from Poynton (£5.90) than from either Bramhall (£7.70) or Cheadle Hulme (£6.30). Given how much further outside the GM border Buxton is than Poynton, can anybody suggest why the Macclesfield line has escaped the net whilst the Buxton, and I understand Alderley Edge lines have not?
I've had a look on National Rail Enquiries and there's only one fare I can find that isn't £8.00 from Prestbury - Piccadilly:View attachment 19266
(Looked on Monday the 15th September, 1 adult)
Do you want a system everyone can understand in a simple way, or do you want an intricate system where even the staff have to look up the restrictions (or guess)?
I note that it will now be cheaper to travel into Manchester, in the evening peak, on a return ticket from Poynton (£5.90) than from either Bramhall (£7.70) or Cheadle Hulme (£6.30). Given how much further outside the GM border Buxton is than Poynton, can anybody suggest why the Macclesfield line has escaped the net whilst the Buxton, and I understand Alderley Edge lines have not?
I was also surprised to see that the Poynton fare is valid via Macclesfield, at least at those times that it is the quickest route!
even if they did , how many are going to refer to it , and how many that do refer to it are likely to understand it , the difficulties we are having here given that we are interested in the railway and ticketingHave Northern Rail said when they will be putting a complete information package regarding this matter upon their website, so that rail travellers can refer to it ?
Have Northern Rail said when they will be putting a complete information package regarding this matter upon their website, so that rail travellers can refer to it ?
@muz379: Trains aren't peak or off-peak per se, only tickets are. If you come into Manchester on a train which starts outside Greater Manchester, an off-peak ticket may still be valid in the evening peak depending on the restriction code.