To be honest, in all the years of working there I would probably describe it as the least left wing place in the country rather than the most anyway. "Social democratic" might be a better way of putting it, the people aren't hard faced to those in need, but I find there is a strong "pull your weight" type attitude that doesn't suffer shirkers
Yes, I'd agree with that. But there is also a very strong traditionalism and "small C" conservatism, and trade unions are also very strong in the more traditional jobs such as the railway. Which is why I think bringing in DOO on Merseyrail will be a *massive* industrial relations challenge.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
London, Manchester, Newcastle etc don't? I don't buy it.
I'm guessing you are at the younger end of things and didn't experience things like the dockers' strikes, miners' strikes etc. Yes the latter affected other places, but as someone who grew up in and around Liverpool (even though I now live darn Sarf) trade unionism and traditionalism in a work context was always very strong, much more so than other cities.
Anyway, if played correctly, redundancies could be cut much further. Expansions to the system (i.e. Skelmersdale link which is a no brainer to me), increase in frequencies on certain services (as you touch upon) and at least slightly later operating times, at least on weekends (although that latter one is controversial in itself if London is anything to go by).
There is also the question as to whether the railway wants the alcohol-influenced custom, particularly given the incidents they have experienced before. There's also that (and I discovered this quite recently) the trend is now to go out much later than before, so the *first* train on a Sunday may be of more interest!
If it has to be a choice between 6-car trainsets or higher frequencies, I'll choose the latter. Clockface 4tph on most branches is good but 6tph is much better and once it gets to that sort of frequency, people stop caring about the timetables and just turn up at the station whenever.
I've oft said Merseyrail is a textbook S-Bahn - bringing frequencies to German levels would further that.
My bugbear with mixed formations is that people often end up waiting at the wrong end of the platform and in busy periods then bunch up in the nearest car. It doesn't help that the new destination boards make no mention of the length of the train. Platform doors or gates with numbers on them could help. Even just pavement markings would.
Er, they say "3 car" and "6 car" on them, assuming the data has been entered. What would help, though, and I half recall may be in place at some stations though I might be thinking of elsewhere, is markings on the platforms (a) showing where a 3-car and 6-car will stop, and (b) showing the door positions so people can queue in the right place when it's busy and avoid blocking the doors.
We could, of course, go for some halfway fixed formation, as Neil suggests, but as a fixed formation, this reduces the maximum overall capacity of the network. I'm thinking of the scenes of chaos that you see in the underground stations when there's a big event on in the city, even with 6-car formations. That said, with more actual trainsets, it may be possible to compensate with a high frequency. I believe the current capacity in the underground sections is much higher than what's currently used.
ISTR that 2 minute headways used to be possible on the Loop but the new signalling may have reduced that slightly. It's still not used to its full capacity, though, and part of the reason is bus deregulation - were the "S-Bahn" it is located in Germany, buses wouldn't go to the city centre, they'd feed the nearest station alone (there are only about 10 bus routes that penetrate Hamburg city centre if that, and it's bigger than Manchester). Were that the case, you'd easily fill 6tph of 6-car per route. Though of course with PTE interavailable ticketing those bus routes do come in handy in disruption - in Germany you're often stuck until rail replacement is arranged.
As for taking high loads, a more S-stock style layout would mean you could accommodate those better as standing passengers, while there'd be enough seats in say an 80 or 100m train for off-peak for everyone.