• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Future Merseyrail stock: Stadler selected as manufacturer

Status
Not open for further replies.

Camden

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2014
Messages
1,949
Well maybe Liverpool's not as left wing as you think if in your opinion it includes Wirral. Wirral West, Wirral South and City of Chester* are all parliamentary seats which either the Conservatives or Labour are able to win. They are all currently Labour but two were Conservative at the 2010 election.

* Part of the Wirral Peninsula is included in the City of Chester seat.

To be honest, in all the years of working there I would probably describe it as the least left wing place in the country rather than the most anyway. "Social democratic" might be a better way of putting it, the people aren't hard faced to those in need, but I find there is a strong "pull your weight" type attitude that doesn't suffer shirkers. That's not to say there aren't shirkers because there certainly are, but I find there is a pretty hard line divide. On political party front I guess it's much like London, rich areas tend to be Tory while poorer areas tend to be Labour (along with certain areas populated by "metropolitan" types, not mentioning any names!)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,389
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
To be honest, in all the years of working there I would probably describe it as the least left wing place in the country rather than the most anyway. "Social democratic" might be a better way of putting it, the people aren't hard faced to those in need, but I find there is a strong "pull your weight" type attitude that doesn't suffer shirkers

Yes, I'd agree with that. But there is also a very strong traditionalism and "small C" conservatism, and trade unions are also very strong in the more traditional jobs such as the railway. Which is why I think bringing in DOO on Merseyrail will be a *massive* industrial relations challenge.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
London, Manchester, Newcastle etc don't? I don't buy it.

I'm guessing you are at the younger end of things and didn't experience things like the dockers' strikes, miners' strikes etc. Yes the latter affected other places, but as someone who grew up in and around Liverpool (even though I now live darn Sarf) trade unionism and traditionalism in a work context was always very strong, much more so than other cities.

Anyway, if played correctly, redundancies could be cut much further. Expansions to the system (i.e. Skelmersdale link which is a no brainer to me), increase in frequencies on certain services (as you touch upon) and at least slightly later operating times, at least on weekends (although that latter one is controversial in itself if London is anything to go by).

There is also the question as to whether the railway wants the alcohol-influenced custom, particularly given the incidents they have experienced before. There's also that (and I discovered this quite recently) the trend is now to go out much later than before, so the *first* train on a Sunday may be of more interest!

If it has to be a choice between 6-car trainsets or higher frequencies, I'll choose the latter. Clockface 4tph on most branches is good but 6tph is much better and once it gets to that sort of frequency, people stop caring about the timetables and just turn up at the station whenever.

I've oft said Merseyrail is a textbook S-Bahn - bringing frequencies to German levels would further that.

My bugbear with mixed formations is that people often end up waiting at the wrong end of the platform and in busy periods then bunch up in the nearest car. It doesn't help that the new destination boards make no mention of the length of the train. Platform doors or gates with numbers on them could help. Even just pavement markings would.

Er, they say "3 car" and "6 car" on them, assuming the data has been entered. What would help, though, and I half recall may be in place at some stations though I might be thinking of elsewhere, is markings on the platforms (a) showing where a 3-car and 6-car will stop, and (b) showing the door positions so people can queue in the right place when it's busy and avoid blocking the doors.

We could, of course, go for some halfway fixed formation, as Neil suggests, but as a fixed formation, this reduces the maximum overall capacity of the network. I'm thinking of the scenes of chaos that you see in the underground stations when there's a big event on in the city, even with 6-car formations. That said, with more actual trainsets, it may be possible to compensate with a high frequency. I believe the current capacity in the underground sections is much higher than what's currently used.

ISTR that 2 minute headways used to be possible on the Loop but the new signalling may have reduced that slightly. It's still not used to its full capacity, though, and part of the reason is bus deregulation - were the "S-Bahn" it is located in Germany, buses wouldn't go to the city centre, they'd feed the nearest station alone (there are only about 10 bus routes that penetrate Hamburg city centre if that, and it's bigger than Manchester). Were that the case, you'd easily fill 6tph of 6-car per route. Though of course with PTE interavailable ticketing those bus routes do come in handy in disruption - in Germany you're often stuck until rail replacement is arranged.

As for taking high loads, a more S-stock style layout would mean you could accommodate those better as standing passengers, while there'd be enough seats in say an 80 or 100m train for off-peak for everyone.
 

Camden

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2014
Messages
1,949
But as I say, that's not a local issue but an industry one. Another way to look at it will be if the unions want to try and kick up a stink about it, they will have to be at loggerheads with a Labour authority(ies), not to mention one that turned down vertical integration.

I don't think the loss of guards jobs will be an issue, I think there will be plenty of other jobs created and it will easily be sold as an "opportunity for all". I also think if the unions were to try anything they would also be on the receiving end of zero public support/sympathy, given what they'd be perceived as protesting against (the eventual modernisation of a heavily used rail system that everyone uses and many people complain about, heat, reliability and so on). That hard line attitude I referred to I could easily see being focussed on the guards. They are simply on the wrong side of progress and budgets.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,389
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
London, Manchester, Newcastle etc don't? I don't buy it.

I'm guessing you are at the younger end of things and didn't experience things like the dockers' strikes, miners' strikes etc. Yes the latter affected other places, but as someone who grew up in and around Liverpool (even though I now live darn Sarf) trade unionism and traditionalism in a work context was always very strong, much more so than other cities.

Anyway, if played correctly, redundancies could be cut much further. Expansions to the system (i.e. Skelmersdale link which is a no brainer to me), increase in frequencies on certain services (as you touch upon) and at least slightly later operating times, at least on weekends (although that latter one is controversial in itself if London is anything to go by).

There is also the question as to whether the railway wants the alcohol-influenced custom, particularly given the incidents they have experienced before. There's also that (and I discovered this quite recently) the trend is now to go out much later than before, so the *first* train on a Sunday may be of more interest!

If it has to be a choice between 6-car trainsets or higher frequencies, I'll choose the latter. Clockface 4tph on most branches is good but 6tph is much better and once it gets to that sort of frequency, people stop caring about the timetables and just turn up at the station whenever.

I've oft said Merseyrail is a textbook S-Bahn - bringing frequencies to German levels would further that.

My bugbear with mixed formations is that people often end up waiting at the wrong end of the platform and in busy periods then bunch up in the nearest car. It doesn't help that the new destination boards make no mention of the length of the train. Platform doors or gates with numbers on them could help. Even just pavement markings would.

Er, they say "3 car" and "6 car" on them, assuming the data has been entered. What would help, though, and I half recall may be in place at some stations though I might be thinking of elsewhere, is markings on the platforms (a) showing where a 3-car and 6-car will stop, and (b) showing the door positions so people can queue in the right place when it's busy and avoid blocking the doors.

We could, of course, go for some halfway fixed formation, as Neil suggests, but as a fixed formation, this reduces the maximum overall capacity of the network. I'm thinking of the scenes of chaos that you see in the underground stations when there's a big event on in the city, even with 6-car formations. That said, with more actual trainsets, it may be possible to compensate with a high frequency. I believe the current capacity in the underground sections is much higher than what's currently used.

ISTR that 2 minute headways used to be possible on the Loop but the new signalling may have reduced that slightly. It's still not used to its full capacity, though, and part of the reason is bus deregulation - were the "S-Bahn" it is located in Germany, buses wouldn't go to the city centre, they'd feed the nearest station alone (there are only about 10 bus routes that penetrate Hamburg city centre if that, and it's bigger than Manchester). Were that the case, you'd easily fill 6tph of 6-car per route. Though of course with PTE interavailable ticketing those bus routes do come in handy in disruption - in Germany you're often stuck until rail replacement is arranged.

As for taking high loads, a more S-stock style layout would mean you could accommodate those better as standing passengers, while there'd be enough seats in say an 80 or 100m train for off-peak for everyone.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Don't forget Merseyrail serve a lot more than just Liverpool itself. I doubt anyone would label The Wirral or Sefton as left wing.

From past instances on Merseyrail it would seem having platform staff at underground stations would do more to improve safety than having guards closing the doors.

Wouldn't they? Have you ever visited Birkenhead or Bootle? Not exactly Tory hot beds.

And that little dig about instances on merseyrail is downright nasty which has had a huge impact on the industry. If you're trying to score points there are far more dignified ways.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,389
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
And that little dig about instances on merseyrail is downright nasty which has had a huge impact on the industry. If you're trying to score points there are far more dignified ways.

Quite. The cause of the incident (other than excess alcohol) was a train being dispatched with someone leaning on it. The same incident could have occurred with a dispatcher or with camera-based DOO. In whatever case, it occurred because the member of staff responsible for dispatch broke the Rule Book, and as a result were prosecuted.
 

Camden

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2014
Messages
1,949
Er, they say "3 car" and "6 car" on them, assuming the data has been entered.

They don't anymore. It used to be very clear (assuming you are referring to what it used to be like)
-----------------------------------
1. Chester 1min 6 Car
2. E Port 3min 3 Car
3 Chester 5min 6 Car
-----------------------------------

Very straightforward.

Now it's:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10:46 Chester Ontime
(scrolling list of stations)......... (Merseyrail) (waits for a while) (3 car)
2nd Ellesmere Port Delayed Due 10:48 (alternates between 2nd and 3rd)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So you only get to see how many carriages for the first train, and only fleetingly right at the very end of watching all the station names go past. It's next to useless.

The displays also come up and show delayed when a service is just running a minute later - I mean what is the point!

It really is rubbish.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
Wouldn't they? Have you ever visited Birkenhead or Bootle? Not exactly Tory hot beds.

Like I pointed out the Conservatives had three seats which covered the Wirral peninsula at the 2010 general election and only narrowly lost them in the 2015 election. Merseyrail is used by Conservative voters and possibly some work for Merseyrail.

And that little dig about instances on merseyrail is downright nasty which has had a huge impact on the industry. If you're trying to score points there are far more dignified ways.

So is safety of passengers only important if they are on the train? If not then you're talking rubbish.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,389
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Have they replaced the displays, or just replaced the software? I guess they have done the latter because Merseyrail is no longer an all-stations operation - Wirral Line trains don't all call at all stations any more.

That said, down South we cope. The PIS shows it as part of the scrolly message, and we also get "this train is formed of 8 coaches" or whatever in the announcements. And the variation is potentially much larger with 12 being the maximum.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
So is safety of passengers only important if they are on the train? If not then you're talking rubbish.

One (1) member of staff was incompetent and failed to follow the Rule Book, someone was killed (who contributed to their own death by being inebriated and leaning on a train that was about to depart) and the member of staff was thrown in jail as a result. Criminal negligence can occur anywhere. The dig at the other staff who do do their jobs properly is unnecessary and inaccurate.
 

Camden

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2014
Messages
1,949
I think software, although the writing does also seem smaller. Perhaps it's because it's not all in caps. It is only Capenhurst which is the exception to the all stations rule, only temporary while there is pressure on rolling stock, and previously this was accommodated on the displays anyway.

I would suggest the announcements will be more effective than the daft scrolling display, but there are none.
 
Last edited:

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
One (1) member of staff was incompetent and failed to follow the Rule Book, someone was killed (who contributed to their own death by being inebriated and leaning on a train that was about to depart) and the member of staff was thrown in jail as a result. Criminal negligence can occur anywhere. The dig at the other staff who do do their jobs properly is unnecessary and inaccurate.

I'm not talking about that incident but as usual on this forum is anyone even hints at guards not being 100% prefect they are shot down.

For the safety of passengers visible staff presence is needed both on trains and at stations, especially late at night. The Lime Street underground platform isn't that big so if there's disruption enough staff are needed at the station to ensure the platform doesn't get overcrowded. The same is true at other stations. A guard who has to do the doors on frequent stop services can't do much else.
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
I have never seen Lime St Low Level overcrowded to the extent of LU or even near it.

If there was an outage affecting the third rail soon after a football match or another special event meaning there were no trains for 45 minutes then I'm sure it would be.
 

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,449
Location
Liverpool
All of the new platform destination boards have train length at the end of the calling points.
I'm afraid you're fooling yourself if you believe service extensions are suddenly going to happen when new stock arrives,it's often been mooted that the final stock number will be less than what they have now

Well they've not been working the last few times I've seen them. Who said anything about 'suddenly'? This new rolling stock is hardly going to 'suddenly' happen. Lastly, less rolling stock than now would be a madness and it's first I've heard of it.
 
Last edited:

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,449
Location
Liverpool
Don't forget Merseyrail serve a lot more than just Liverpool itself. I doubt anyone would label The Wirral or Sefton as left wing

Bootle, Birkenhead etc aren't left wing? Southport-aside, both boroughs are represented entirely by Labour MPs (although it's surely not as simple as that). What we're talking about here are lazy stereotypes (which come up on this forum, without fail, every time there's a Liverpool topic). Neil suggests I'm not old enough to remember the dockers strikes and miners strikes (miners strikes in Liverpool!!!????) and yes it's a bit before my time but I'm not ignorant of the city's history (the irony). He fails to qualify why strikes in Liverpool were supposedly any worse than anywhere else, as it seems they were just as bad in other urban areas of Britain, especially ones which actually had mines and how this can be seen as a reflection on the city's culture and attitude as a whole rather than a reflection of the issues faced by employees of a particular industry (docks and shipping) at a particular point of time. If that's difficult enough, how can it possibly be used to qualify the hypothesis that Merseyrail guards in 2015 are somehow more chippy and Trot than those of any other TOC?
 
Last edited:

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
Bootle, Birkenhead etc aren't left wing?

I didn't say those specific places I said The Wirral and Sefton collectively.

I've already made points about 3 Labour MPs representing The Wirral peninsula (not specifically the borough) winning seats from the Conservatives at the last election. The Wirral peninsula is more appropriate than the borough when talking about Merseyrail given Merseyrail extends as far as Chester and Ellesmere Port.

entirely by Labour MPs

If that's your benchmark for most left-wing city then perhaps an incorrect conclusion has been drawn. The Green Party is seen as more left-wing than Labour. Which cities have Green MPs? Not Liverpool, but Brighton does.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,389
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
It was you who was dismissing any possible safety concerns from crowding on the Lime Street lower level platform.

No, I was disagreeing with your point that dispatchers are needed. There are many platforms throughout the country that get a bit crowded when there is disruption and don't have dispatchers, who in any case are going to make precious little difference to anything in terms of managing crowded platforms. A member of staff at the station watching the CCTV and closing the entrance when it gets silly will suffice, and they can double as the ticket office staff.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If that's difficult enough, how can it possibly be used to qualify the hypothesis that Merseyrail guards in 2015 are somehow more chippy and Trot than those of any other TOC?

We shall see, as things that aren't mathematical are rather difficult to "quantify". I suspect I will be right unless *all* the guards are offered driver jobs (or a very good redundancy package is offered to those who aren't), which might well make them happy as the pay is higher.
 

Camden

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2014
Messages
1,949
how this can be seen as a reflection on the city's culture and attitude as a whole rather than a reflection of the issues faced by employees of a particular industry (docks and shipping) at a particular point of time.

I think the depiction of Liverpool as a "city of striking dockers" can get carried away. Perhaps, if going back to historical cliches is the way it has to be, then describing as a "city of dockers, and shipping line owners and their various accountants" might carry the more complicated picture.

Allerton, Mossley Hill, Woolton and so on are a bit like the Enchanted Wood in that no one who hasn't been there will believe they exist. It seems that a lot of people want to think Liverpool is all or mostly like Bootle (which funnily enough is in Sefton!) Perhaps it's a case of limited imagination, but it's a bit like saying all of London is like Peckham. (Bad example maybe).
 

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,449
Location
Liverpool
I was just using the largest constituent town in each borough, both of which share the general Liverpool stereotype of uncouth Scouseness and squalor. Wirral Borough is the vast majority of the Wirral Peninsula, especially so where Merseyrail is concerned. Ellesmere Port & Neston too returned a Labour MP at the last election. The whole of the Wirral is currently represented by Labour MPs.

Your last point is pretty much what I'm getting at. How do you measure how left wing a city is? Like you say, Brighton has a theoretically more left wing parliamentary representation than Liverpool does. Liverpool City Council also still has an opposition (just about) unlike 100% Labour Manchester. Liverpool also had a Lib Dem administration until fairly recently. Rotherham MBC never has had anything but Labour. Liverpool's political history has always been more complex and multifaceted than the English caricature of it suggests.

--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I think the depiction of Liverpool as a "city of striking dockers" can get carried away. Perhaps, if going back to historical cliches is the way it has to be, then describing as a "city of dockers, and shipping line owners and their various accountants" might carry the more complicated picture.

Allerton, Mossley Hill, Woolton and so on are a bit like the Enchanted Wood in that no one who hasn't been there will believe they exist. It seems that a lot of people want to think Liverpool is all or mostly like Bootle (which funnily enough is in Sefton!) Perhaps it's a case of limited imagination, but it's a bit like saying all of London is like Peckham. (Bad example maybe).

Not much to add, but pretty much agree. It's like someone I came across who couldn't accept that Brookside Close could be a real Liverpool street as Liverpool only has terraced housing. That in turn reminds me of an American girl who was having none of it when I tried to convince here that you do get brunettes in Finland & Sweden. I'm not kidding on either anecdote, though I've always kind of hoped the former was trolling.
 
Last edited:

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,693
Location
Northwich
No, I was disagreeing with your point that dispatchers are needed.

I said a staff presence on platforms not a dispatcher. It might be at some stations a dispatcher could be beneficial but putting someone on a platform in a safety/security role doesn't have to mean dispatching trains is part of their role.
 

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,449
Location
Liverpool
We shall see, as things that aren't mathematical are rather difficult to "quantify". I suspect I will be right unless *all* the guards are offered driver jobs (or a very good redundancy package is offered to those who aren't), which might well make them happy as the pay is higher.

I said 'qualify'. Qualify you assertions. I've had enough of this anyway. Basically when the time comes and redundancies are handed out and the poor souls affected aren't happy and understandably try and avoid it happening, you're going to say "See, I told you so. Most left wing city". Nice one, Neil.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,389
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I said 'qualify'. Qualify you assertions. I've had enough of this anyway. Basically when the time comes and redundancies are handed out and the poor souls affected aren't happy and understandably try and avoid it happening, you're going to say "See, I told you so. Most left wing city". Nice one, Neil.

If you'd read my posts properly, you wouldn't have put those precise words ("left wing") in my mouth, because I didn't say them originally.

What would make the point would be how long it goes on for, and whether the guards actually win. I know the city, I grew up there, and I know the traditional union attitudes. Yes, I can understand an attempt, but I would think Liverpool's culture might make them fight that little bit harder and longer (with a little more hardship endured) like the dockers - but maybe actually win.

If you read it properly, you would realise it was not an insult against my city of birth - far from it.
 
Last edited:

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Like I pointed out the Conservatives had three seats which covered the Wirral peninsula at the 2010 general election and only narrowly lost them in the 2015 election. Merseyrail is used by Conservative voters and possibly some work for Merseyrail.



So is safety of passengers only important if they are on the train? If not then you're talking rubbish.

If I thought like that then I'd hand my drivers key in. You really don't have a clue about staff mentality on safety do you? I'll hold back on what I really think as I actually like posting on here for some reason. Don't want that warning turning into a ban.
 

jamesst

Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
1,116
Location
Merseyside
They don't anymore. It used to be very clear (assuming you are referring to what it used to be like)
-----------------------------------
1. Chester 1min 6 Car
2. E Port 3min 3 Car
3 Chester 5min 6 Car
-----------------------------------

Very straightforward.

Now it's:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10:46 Chester Ontime
(scrolling list of stations)......... (Merseyrail) (waits for a while) (3 car)
2nd Ellesmere Port Delayed Due 10:48 (alternates between 2nd and 3rd)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So you only get to see how many carriages for the first train, and only fleetingly right at the very end of watching all the station names go past. It's next to useless.

The displays also come up and show delayed when a service is just running a minute later - I mean what is the point!

It really is rubbish.

9 times out of 10 when a service is delayed it has the expected due time,not just delayed. It displays delayed if the train is at a stand and they're not sure when it will move. I can't see anything wrong with the screens at all
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
98,389
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
9 times out of 10 when a service is delayed it has the expected due time,not just delayed. It displays delayed if the train is at a stand and they're not sure when it will move. I can't see anything wrong with the screens at all

Arguably the fact that the standard display as used by pretty much every other TOC is used is a good thing.
 

razor89

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
187
But as I say, that's not a local issue but an industry one. Another way to look at it will be if the unions want to try and kick up a stink about it, they will have to be at loggerheads with a Labour authority(ies), not to mention one that turned down vertical integration.

I don't think the loss of guards jobs will be an issue, I think there will be plenty of other jobs created and it will easily be sold as an "opportunity for all". I also think if the unions were to try anything they would also be on the receiving end of zero public support/sympathy, given what they'd be perceived as protesting against (the eventual modernisation of a heavily used rail system that everyone uses and many people complain about, heat, reliability and so on). That hard line attitude I referred to I could easily see being focussed on the guards. They are simply on the wrong side of progress and budgets.

If you really believe this you are being incredibly naïve. It is proving to be a huge issue elsewhere and I have no idea why you think Merseyrail guards will just roll over. The fact that it's a Labour authority makes no difference. Trying to sell some patronising idea of "opportunity for all" won't work. RMT and ASLEF I suspect couldn't care less about public support.

I'm not talking about that incident but as usual on this forum is anyone even hints at guards not being 100% prefect they are shot down.

For the safety of passengers visible staff presence is needed both on trains and at stations, especially late at night. The Lime Street underground platform isn't that big so if there's disruption enough staff are needed at the station to ensure the platform doesn't get overcrowded. The same is true at other stations. A guard who has to do the doors on frequent stop services can't do much else.

All the underground stations on Merseyrail already have adequate staff to provide a platform presence when necessary. They also have contingency plans to provide more staff for crowd control during busy periods.
 

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,449
Location
Liverpool
If you'd read my posts properly, you wouldn't have put those precise words ("left wing") in my mouth, because I didn't say them originally.

What would make the point would be how long it goes on for, and whether the guards actually win. I know the city, I grew up there, and I know the traditional union attitudes. Yes, I can understand an attempt, but I would think Liverpool's culture might make them fight that little bit harder and longer (with a little more hardship endured) like the dockers - but maybe actually win.

If you read it properly, you would realise it was not an insult against my city of birth - far from it.

We've been talking for about two or so pages about how accurate the assertion, originally made by driver_m is: that Liverpool is the arguably UK's most left wing city. You've been making arguments strongly insinuating you agree with the statement. Arguing semantics about what particular words you have or haven't said is not here or there. I claim the statement is more than just arguable but highly contentious and not based on anything other than a national media inspired caricature. You grew up in Liverpool. You didn't grow up in any of the other places going through a similar process of deindustrialisation (practically every large urban area). Maybe if you did, you'd think that particular town or city was the most left wing.

The dockers lost. I don't think it's a good example of dead 'ard scousers telling the powers that be what's what or any motivation for a Merseyrail guard to hope that their job will be safe.
 

jamesst

Member
Joined
4 May 2011
Messages
1,116
Location
Merseyside
The RMT and ASLEFs primary concern quite right is there members not the public. The members are the people that pay every payday. Anyone that thinks there won't be a fight over this is completely deluded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top